Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

tDem bill would require 10 years of tax disclosures by presidential candidates
The Hill ^ | 7/18/12 | Bernie Becker

Posted on 07/18/2012 12:37:09 PM PDT by Nachum

A senior House Democrat on Wednesday promised to introduce legislation requiring all presidential candidates to release a decade of their tax returns. The effort by Rep. Sandy Levin (Mich.), the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, is aimed at presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who has come under increasing pressure to release more of his returns. “The stunning lack of transparency from someone in pursuit of the highest office in the country highlights the need to change the law to require fuller disclosure,” Levin said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bill; disclosures; presidential; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Attaaaaack Waaaaatch
1 posted on 07/18/2012 12:37:20 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“The stunning lack of transparency from someone in pursuit of the highest office in the country highlights the need to change the law to require fuller disclosure,” Levin said in a statement.”

Lets start with the lack of transparency with the buffoon who now occupies the White House and goes by the name of Obama. Once he opens up his past records then we can talk.


2 posted on 07/18/2012 12:40:07 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Maybe the Pubbies should offer an amendment that all candidates must prove they meet the eligibility requirements for office (such as being a natural born citizen, for example).


3 posted on 07/18/2012 12:40:24 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Can we toss in college transcripts and a birth certificate?
4 posted on 07/18/2012 12:40:27 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Does the bill exempt Obama?


5 posted on 07/18/2012 12:40:56 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1274 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They don’t really want it to pass. If republicans force the issue, the democrats will back down.

Not to mention that its just more time wasting legislation.


6 posted on 07/18/2012 12:41:22 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Of course. Otherwise it would be Ex Post Facto and you know how much the Libs respect the Constitution.


7 posted on 07/18/2012 12:42:17 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Tack on the requirement that presidential candidates must also prove with a non-fraudulent, official birth certicate, that they are a natural born U.S. citizen and this thing would be thrown in the “circular file” faster than Barry headed off to a celebrity fundraiser.


8 posted on 07/18/2012 12:42:28 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Who is Barack Hussein Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Of course. Otherwise it would be Ex Post Facto and you know how much the Libs respect the Constitution.


9 posted on 07/18/2012 12:42:28 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just amend it to require them to release their birth certificate and their college records too.

I say full disclosure is good for everyone involved.


10 posted on 07/18/2012 12:43:10 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Not to mention that its just more time wasting legislation.

Call me silly, but I feel safer when congress is wasting time.

/johnny

11 posted on 07/18/2012 12:43:43 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


12 posted on 07/18/2012 12:43:43 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Fine with me—let’s also include social security cards and selective service registration. Might also want to check on reason for loss of lawyer’s license and shady real estate deals. Also any felonies—such as use and distribution to friends of cocaine.

Bring it on!!!


13 posted on 07/18/2012 12:43:54 PM PDT by ponz7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
Minor Levin makes a noise.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
14 posted on 07/18/2012 12:44:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just amend it to require them to release their birth certificate and their college records too. And allow public examination of the original records.

I say full disclosure is good for everyone involved.

We’ll find out that Obama made a lot of money through Bain and probably has ties to other Mormon interests. And we’ll find out that the Kenyan was never eligible in the first place.


15 posted on 07/18/2012 12:44:37 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just amend it to require them to release their origional unmodified birth certificate and their college records too. And allow public examination of the original records.

I say full disclosure is good for everyone involved.

We’ll find out that Obama made a lot of money through Bain and probably has ties to other Mormon interests. And we’ll find out that the Kenyan was never eligible in the first place.


16 posted on 07/18/2012 12:45:14 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

““The stunning lack of transparency from someone in pursuit of the highest office in the country highlights the need to change the law to require fuller disclosure,” Levin said in a statement.”

OMG these people are shameless. NOW they apparently are trying to say the laws were unclear for vetting Obama, and that’s the fault of the old dead white guys that wrote the Constitution of course.

All of a sudden DAJ (Day after Joe) we see something that looks like a setup for a defense of the Democrat Congress for not vetting their candidate properly.

“Change the law” being code for existing law being unclear.


17 posted on 07/18/2012 12:46:23 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
Maybe the Pubbies should offer an amendment that all candidates must prove they meet the eligibility requirements for office (such as being a natural born citizen, for example).

Yes, the form Pelousi signed did NOT certify 0dumbo as elgigible. That should be included.

This is yet another oppportunity for ABO to win some points.

18 posted on 07/18/2012 12:47:48 PM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They’re just so clever, aren’t they? So thoughtful.


19 posted on 07/18/2012 12:48:27 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
OMG these people are shameless. NOW they apparently are trying to say the laws were unclear for vetting Obama, and that’s the fault of the old dead white guys that wrote the Constitution of course.

You can get away with this kind of outrage when you own the MSM 100%. That's why it's called the "state-owned media."

20 posted on 07/18/2012 12:49:34 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson