Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney haters, did you cry to your parents when u lost growing up
Threads | 7/14/2012 | Self

Posted on 07/14/2012 9:24:58 PM PDT by shoedog

I have to wonder if all the Romney haters on this site were the same people who ran home to mom when they lost at games as kids. I did not vote for Romney in the primaries. If you asked anyone that knows me, they would say I am right of Reagan. What I don't understand is all of you that love this country,which I truly believe you do, that are willing to not vote for Romney and potentially allow this country to fail by re-electing Obama!, how does that make sense?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fail; notmyproblemrino; republicans; rinoamore; rinotard; tblcrap; typingwhiledrunk; vanity; whenmittbotsattack; winning; younominatedhim; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300 ... 401-424 next last
To: Jim from C-Town; raccoonnookkeeper; shoedog; Hugin; Artcore; EternalVigilance

Funny, but Romney did the exact same things that Obama did, but Romney did them first. Obama simply followed the path laid out and made possible by by Romney, now our “last hope.”

How soon we forget how a real conservative conducts himself:

http://www.youtube.com/embed/OvN1jTkzXbY?rel=0

H/T: EternalVigilance


201 posted on 07/15/2012 12:34:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Ask Levin who he is gonna vote for? (Romney) will he stay home and not vote?(no) Is he still on FR ? (I doubt it)


202 posted on 07/15/2012 12:34:36 AM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: woofie

As much as I love him, I wouldn’t doubt that Levin is locked into the GOP just like all the others. I am not.


203 posted on 07/15/2012 12:36:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: raccoonnookkeeper
‘I wish he WOULD tell Obama off about these whoppers that Obama is telling about him’

Here in Ohio Romney is hitting Obama hard on his attacks against Bain. He outright calls him a liar that can't be trusted.

204 posted on 07/15/2012 12:38:03 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I do admire your consistency


205 posted on 07/15/2012 12:38:03 AM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Give us a viable option to Romney, or have a nice warm cup of STFU.
***FR is a conservative website, not a republican one. What makes you come onto a conservative website trying to separate conservatives from their conservative beliefs? You’re the one who should STFU.


206 posted on 07/15/2012 12:38:26 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
***That’s because Romnuts has more respect for his fellow libruls than for conservatives.

Well, yeah, that of course, and he's too damn afraid to fully take on Obama out of fear of being called a racist or a right-wing ideologue..LOL.

Romney is the weakest possible candidate! He thinks he has to appeal to the squishy middle with a lot of psycho babble nonsense. Screw the conservatives who don't believe him anyway.

Any Tea Party conservative would rip the Marxist to shreds, but Romney can't and won't because his record is too much like Obama's.

Sheeeesh. This election should have been a walk in the park.

207 posted on 07/15/2012 12:38:26 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: woofie

By the way, I will be voting but it won’t be for an abortionist/homosexualist statist who has no idea what conservatism even means.


208 posted on 07/15/2012 12:38:40 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Don't put words in my mouth ya concrete blockhead, if you're going to climb on board the Romney bandwagon, don't be surprised when you and those who supported Mitt-Witt STILL go sailing off the edge of the cliff, albeit at around 60 mph instead of 110 like the Kenyan usurper's velocity.

I could write in my cat's name, but it would pretty much be a wasted vote. So, I'll instead vote for whomever is the candidate against Obama... because Obama hates this country and will destroy it (more).

209 posted on 07/15/2012 12:39:54 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I doubt if there is gonna be any resolution to this split....It just is what it is


210 posted on 07/15/2012 12:40:44 AM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: shoedog

You aren’t worried that Romney will run the Republican party further to the Left?


211 posted on 07/15/2012 12:41:18 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny

>> Romney’s loss, on the other hand, would put the fear of God into RINOs

This IS the essence of anti-Romney argument which I believe is a valid argument.

All the other assertions, principles, methodologies, sophistic dismissals, and for-is-not-against rhetoric is itself bunk. The math is very, very simple regardless of the symbolism that lands in the middle under the veil of 3rd party, or no vote at all. If the goal is to crush the GOP Establishment, then direct action should be taken to support Obama. Any vote that does not go to Obama helps Romney. Leaving the outcome up to other votes isn’t a persuasive argument when the goal is to prevent Romney from winning.

I don’t understand the problem with saying: “To Hell with Romney and the GOP Establishment. I’m voting for Obama to ensure the final destruction of the machine that’s continually betrayed Life and the constituency.”

That is clear is day — it makes sense. No convoluted indirection, concerns about sophistry, nor the double-negative, back-flipping, anti-anti-votes.

It would indeed be a radical statement to say one is voting for Obama for the aforementioned reasons, but considering the numerous accusations of cowardice, it is plausible that the courageous move would involve declaring one’s vote for Obama — a vote that would be an unambiguous, direct attack against the GOP Establishment.

Hell, I’m beginning to talk myself into doing so... (grinning)


212 posted on 07/15/2012 12:42:14 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Not exactly Jim.

If only we could dig up Ronald Reagan and make him serve again. We can't. He is dead. We can only hope that Romney can save some vestige of the America Reagan left us. We know Obama wants to kill it

213 posted on 07/15/2012 12:42:45 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

No, technically we don’t have a 2 party system. We have something that started maybe as a 2 or 3 party system and evolved into a single party system with 2 faces.
***Well said.


214 posted on 07/15/2012 12:43:04 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain
who taut u how 2 typ like tis?

LOL!.

That's how they interpret the Constitution, too. Just skip a few bits here and there...

215 posted on 07/15/2012 12:44:08 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
"Members of a Christian cult that supports the Zionist state simply demonstrate to the world their ignorance of Christianity and Judaism, as well as their pathetic naïveté." - Charlie Reese

Can you find someone other than a raging anti-Semite to quote, please?

216 posted on 07/15/2012 12:44:40 AM PDT by 92nina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; shoedog; Jim Robinson
You aren’t worried that Romney will run the Republican party further to the Left?

^5

If Romney manages to win, he will be the first successful RINO. (Since the inception of the acronym).

217 posted on 07/15/2012 12:47:21 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Neither have I ruled out an act of God. Onward with Congress.


218 posted on 07/15/2012 12:47:30 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

By the way, I will be voting but it won’t be for an abortionist/homosexualist statist who has no idea what conservatism even means.
***Same here, straight ticket Republican Conservative all the way down. I’ll be writing in Palin, although lately she’s been sounding more republican than conservative.

Why is it that there are so many FReepers who think it is their duty to separate conservatives from their conservative principles on this conservative website? This is not a republican website.


219 posted on 07/15/2012 12:48:08 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; everyone

Excellent!

Keeping praying for a miracle in Tampa!

Good night, everyone!

God bless and keep you all.


220 posted on 07/15/2012 12:49:46 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; everyone

Excellent!

Keeping praying for a miracle in Tampa!

Good night, everyone!

God bless and keep you all.


221 posted on 07/15/2012 12:49:46 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

I posted that to remind you of the difference between a conservative and a mealy-mouthed, squishy statist like Romney seeing as how we have so many people claiming Romney is our last conservative hope. Go news for you. The Reagan-loathing Romney represents the death of the GOP has a conservative party.


222 posted on 07/15/2012 12:50:38 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots


Free Republic

223 posted on 07/15/2012 12:51:29 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

The problem with that statement is that it would make no sense for a conservative who hates socialism to say that I am voting against the Fabian socialist Romney by voting for a Marxist socialist Obama.

I hate RINOs, the GOP-e and the entire liberal GOP establishment but just as I will not vote for a socialist like Romney, I will also not vote for a socialist like Obama.

So though some ABOs seem to have no problem voting for their favorite socialist, my conservative principles won’t allow me to vote for people like Romney or Obama.


224 posted on 07/15/2012 12:56:29 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

That question borders on a non sequitur! If the premise is that you vote the down ticket conservatives into power while allowing little barry bastard to remain in power makes any sense (the conservatives will rein in the sonofabitch???), then voting the same conservatives into offices to rein in the liberal Romney is the modus operendus, but somehow the twisted reasoning turns that on its head and says these conservatives aren’t going to be conservatives if Romney is elected??? It’s so convoluted a pretzel maker would be needed to make sense of it! It is demonically brillant spin.


225 posted on 07/15/2012 12:58:25 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Amen, Sister FReeper. We pray together.


226 posted on 07/15/2012 1:04:04 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
You just love that word "spittle" and any of its derivatives, don't you? {^)
227 posted on 07/15/2012 1:05:57 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I never said that he was our last Conservative hope. I said he was our ONLY hope. Conservative, unfortunately, he is not! He also isn't as bad as Obama. You know it, I know it, hell, even Obama knows it. That is why I will vote against Obama’s second term by Voting for Romney and denying Obama four extra years to create mayhem.

Some FReepers in Texas, California, or New York may have the luxury of voting their strict conscience. I live in the swing state of all swing states. As Ohio goes, so goes the nation. It is THE most important state for ANY Republican and therefore I have to be a bit more pragmatic than someone in a state that is 10 points out of reach in either direction.

When the primaries came to my Ohio, I voted for Santorum on the ballot that he was on and Gingrich on the ballot that he was on. Neither where on all the ballots, as neither could get all the delegates. I did what I could for Conservatism in the primaries. I voted against Romney and For the MOST CONSERVATIVE candidate I could vote for.

In November, I will do what I can for my country, my future and for the future of my children. I will vote to throw the Marxist/Stalinist Jack Wagon out on his ASS! and I will do so with glee! I am chomping at the bit to do so, and pray to God that Conservatives in all contested states do the same!

228 posted on 07/15/2012 1:06:51 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

It’s also a good reminder to those godless squishy RINOs who are trying to divorce God, Life, family, liberty from economic freedom. Cannot be done. Our unalienable rights are a gift from God. God’s gifts of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is what makes America possible. It’s a package deal. Defend it, all of it, or lose it.


229 posted on 07/15/2012 1:08:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

There’s no question about the contempt.

I don’t get the reasons for not maximizing the chances for the desired outcome. It seems to me many prefer to leave the outcome to chance instead pushing it in the correct direction.

I seriously don’t get the passive choice given the fact there is a desired outcome.


230 posted on 07/15/2012 1:09:03 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I coined the term spittlegeist ... and youse got it, beelzebubba.


231 posted on 07/15/2012 1:10:52 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I always liked the word Lickspittle myself!


232 posted on 07/15/2012 1:13:33 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Romney is Wile E. Coyote Obama is more like Yosemite Sam.


233 posted on 07/15/2012 1:14:43 AM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

234 posted on 07/15/2012 1:16:27 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama, you've already lost. - TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

If you are a pro-life, pro-family, pro-liberty, small government conservative you would see that he is most definitely as bad as Obama. What part of Romney’s godless liberal progessivism, abortionism, homosexualism, statism, gun grabbing, big government socialism is less evil than Obama’s?


235 posted on 07/15/2012 1:16:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
If the goal is to crush the GOP Establishment, then direct action should be taken to support Obama. Any vote that does not go to Obama helps Romney.

My goal in voting third party is to deny a popular mandate to whichever statist wins; a lack of popular mandate would help conservatives in Congress regardless of which guy won. Despite your protestations to the contrary, a third-party vote favors neither Obama nor Romney. It's MATH.

If it was Obama who happened to win instead of Romney -- and Obama has lost so much support that it's a good bet he couldn't pull even 50% of the popular vote and could only eke a plurality -- it would help to crush the GOP Establishment because their guy LOST and squish moderate Republicans wouldn't want to be next, so they'd be more inclined to become more conservative.

But just as the price of voting "against" Obama is to vote FOR statist Romney, the price of voting FOR a plurality is to forfeit any say in whether Obama or Romney wins.

Keep grinning if it makes you feel better.

236 posted on 07/15/2012 1:20:48 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Romney’s in a pickle now by hiding his records.

Sometimes honesty just does not pay. That was Newt’s problem. Newt plays political adviser on TV on Fox and other networks. Even while he was still in the primaries he would talk honestly about what each candidate needed to do to win the primary. And from what I’ve been hearing out of Wolfeboro the Romney campaign used Newt’s political advice which he generously offered on the networks.


237 posted on 07/15/2012 1:44:08 AM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

As a conservative, I hate socialists even more than I hate the GOP-e. If I were willing to give up my conservative principles, things might be different. But my desired outcome is all socialists gone. If that happened, I would not have to worry about the GOP-e. If all the socialists were gone, the GOP-e being liberals, would already be gone.


238 posted on 07/15/2012 1:48:52 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I understand the plurality argument, but I doubt it will matter if Obama wins. It might impact a Romney win given the MSM bias.

I’m not sure a non-plural win for Obama would convince the GOP-E of anything. A non-plural for Romney would be taken as a “great achievement” regardless of how idiotic the interpretation. Ultimately, non-plurality will be spun to insignificance. The focus will be on signing authority which cares naught for plurality.


239 posted on 07/15/2012 1:50:55 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: shoedog
Romney haters, did you cry to your parents when u you lost growing up?
240 posted on 07/15/2012 1:51:03 AM PDT by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

When the major concern is the state of the GOP and thereby America, then voting for Romney is wholly counter productive.

On the one hand, Romney as President of The United States and top Republican, will run the GOP farther to the Left. On the other hand, Obama will keep the GOP opposed to his Liberal policies.

Either one of them is a bad choice but voting for Romney and owning what you know he stands for is worse from a true Conservative point of view.

Not voting for Romney and being LOUD about it, sends a Conservative message. Voting for Romney sends no message because he is Liberal.


241 posted on 07/15/2012 1:57:14 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Never voting for Liberal Romney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

Even though it’s a tough election, I’m confident things will work out.


242 posted on 07/15/2012 1:58:02 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I am confident things will work out as well. That is why Obama does not scare me as he scares ABOs. In the end, I know who is in control and though we may go through some very dark times, the Lord will see us through them all.


243 posted on 07/15/2012 2:03:32 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

0bama surely is a progressive dream-come-true. He has moved the overton window such an incredible distance to the left, that many think that a liberal is actually a Republican. Romney is another step towards a thousand years of darkness.


244 posted on 07/15/2012 2:13:21 AM PDT by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: shoedog

for the record, I truly don’t care who wins the presidential election in 2012 but to be brutally honest, the only true victory that I can see for conservatives involves Obama winning. Now, I could never bring myself to vote for Obama of course but I feel the same way about Mitt Romney. Regardless, I will certainly be voting for Josh Mandel and doing my part to hand the Senate over to the Republican party so we can set about making some real changes you can believe in.


245 posted on 07/15/2012 2:13:35 AM PDT by RC one (this space intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

Amen.


246 posted on 07/15/2012 2:13:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Some of us are dealing with decisions larger and more personal than your obsession with the anti-Christian, anti-conservative, anti-American guy Romney, winning over Obama.

My vote and who I am, transcends your personal interests, or level of knowledge, or whatever, to me.

I know things that you do not, I have personal commitments that you cannot know, I vote, but there are things that I will not vote for, will not support, people that I cannot lend my name to, my moral support to, or anything from me to.

Presidential elections are very important, but there is more going on than your agenda to get Bishop Romney into office.

While I understand the arguments about Obama versus Mitt Romney, I am a free man, and my vote means nothing if I always feel forced to choose between those two, I do get to make a choice of my own, or else voting means nothing, at least to me.

In this case both men are such, that I cannot support either.


247 posted on 07/15/2012 2:24:42 AM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors,,, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
None of the candidates on the Republican side were ideal, all had some sort of issue. Personally Romney is a better person than Obama, but that wouldn't take much. Romney is definitely part of the big government establishment though, and while he won't spend like Obama, I don't for see the drastic cuts needed, and this country will still be headed toward a fiscal cliff, just not as fast. The problem is how people react in this country, that is not until there is a crises, the best example would be the Tea Party. It was created because Obama got elected and a lot of people around the country said "OH ****", the problem is that most in that group have a real jobs and can't spend the time needed like those that support Obama. We need to decide how to proceed in this election, supporting Romney will stop the major fiscal bleeding that we see under Obama, but we will still be headed towards the fiscal cliff. Or do we allow Obama to get elected again for four more years in the hope that enough people get concerned enough to fix the problem? (if it still can be fixed?).
248 posted on 07/15/2012 2:37:09 AM PDT by fatherofthree (Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: fatherofthree
Personally Romney is a better person than Obama, but that wouldn't take much.

That isn't true, the Bishop is a monster, a wicked man, with a simple personal life.

Look at Obama's life, on the surface it is as clean and pure as Mitt Romney's.

249 posted on 07/15/2012 3:16:56 AM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors,,, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

I’m from a safely Dhim state that no Republican candidate for president will ever win so we don’t get to see anything here. From reading Freepers’ comments, Romney & Co seem to have been taking a nap. It’s good to hear that Romney actually does important thing: focus on battle ground states at this early stage of general campaign.


250 posted on 07/15/2012 3:30:51 AM PDT by paudio (OTP: Why do people want to rehire a mechanic who clearly only made their car worse than before?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300 ... 401-424 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson