On the contrary, I have what Levin said. And, certainly in this instance, that's good enough for me. I've never known him to be one to pull such "accusations" out of thin air.
I do not put my trust in lawyers.
Wow, implying I "put my (entire) trust in lawyers." Sure, Levin happens to be a (damn good constitutional) lawyer. But, silly me, that means his opinion cannot be trusted. I can't possibly compete against such brilliant reasoning.
Levins explanation was flimsy.
Oh, well, your opinion is golden.
Have fun chasing your conspiracy theories. I look forward to the full exposé once you uncover the details of that relationship between Levin and Palin.
All you have is “What HE said”. And, HIS opinion is good enough for me, and HIS opinion can be trusted.
Hey, Mark, is that you?