OJ was guilty. Problem was, the jury only saw race when justice is supposed to be blind.
I watched every minute of the coverage of that obscenity. I came to the conclusion that O.J.’s son used his butchering knives to do that monstrous deed, in a fit of rage, and Simpson went to the scene of the crime and then tried to get out of town and get his son ‘out of the way’. I know, I know, a civil court found him liable for wrongful deaths, but the knives used, the socks on the bed, the out of place bloody glove, the very small trace of blood in Simpson’s vehicle after he supposedly butchered two human beings at a very bloody crime scene, the presence of EDTA int he blood sampling of the socks (a preservative placed in vials of blood to keep it from coagulation after being drawn to take for testing), the delayed deliver of the vials of Simpson’s blood samples ... no, Ihtink Simpson was guilty of covering up for his son, but I don’t think he committed the murders. With Sandusky, I have no doubt he is an evil sexual degenerate who has abused children and would go on doing so if not locked awy for the rest of his evil life. And I haven’t even mentioned what I think of the enablers at Pedo University who made this monster’s run of evil last so long and harm so many kids.
Didn't matter. The victims were honkies, therefore no crime was committed. At lest, that's apparently how the jury saw it.