Posted on 06/22/2012 10:17:42 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Elizabeth Warrens Birthday Gift From GOP: An Ancestry.com Account
Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren turns 63 today, and among her birthday gifts is one she probably wont appreciate very much. Shes in a tight race against the GOP incumbent, Scott Brown. The states Republican party announced this morning that it is gifting Warren, a Harvard Law professor, with a complimentary account at ancestry.com.
Since Professor Warren has failed to come up with any evidence supporting her claims to Native American ancestry, we thought this Ancestry.com account would make the perfect birthday gift, said Massachusetts Republican Party executive director Nate Little in a statement.
Warren has come under fire in recent months for identifying herself as Native American in law school directories based on a blood line that she said goes far back, though there has not yet been primary documentation to back up her claim.
The Warren campaign did not immediately respond to ABC Newss request for comment.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
LMAO!!!!
lol~! very clever!
bwaahahaha!
Sorry—no Cherokee ancestors of “Lieawatha” have been found.
Try a new search.
If the person who came up with this one isn’t already a FReeper, then sign him up now!
Brill-yunt.
“tight race????” - Is this true....could someone from Mass. please clarify???
Dad never told us much nor allow us to use it to get into college, get jobs or gain other priveliges we might have claimed.
excellent
ha- shows how much you know....she’s an ancestor of fauxcahontas...
ROTFL!!
send it to drudge! i would but i am using my dumb phone
A poster on Holly Robuchard’s blog explained it to me. He doesn’t care if she’s certifiably insane. As long as she’s a rubber stamp for Obama he’s voting for her. At 63 she won’t even finish the term. She’ll give it up in two years so that Deval Patrick can give it to JoeK3.
Paleface woman speak with fork tounge . She make heap big hit with her party .
To,be fair, Ancestry.com is a huge swindle. According to that site, I don’t exist and have no relatives.
That’s funny. It’s kinda like when I sent some earth imaging software developers, I worked with, a membership to the Flat Earth Society.
I don’t get it. Even Marsha Choakley was a better candidate than Warren, Pow Wow Chow, aside. She is stiff, appears strained and importunate (at best). Scott Brown beat Marsha C. because people were worked up about ObamaCare. I just don’s see what’s made Obama and his dismal record any more appealing in the past 18 months. This state is weird.
Stop snickering.
This is series stuff.
As for me...I was going to sign it but... I just simply ran out of time today because I MUST go to the grocery store to watch them unload the produce and I’m late already so I’ve gotta run and won’t be able to participate.

I don't care who you are ... that right there is funny!
Barry needs one too
TT
In Massachusetts, unenrolled voters (those who do not declare any party affiliation) total more than Democrat and Republican voters combined. It's hard predicting how the unenrolled will vote. As for polling in Massachusetts, the media tends to skew polls by five to ten percent in favor of the left. So if the polls say Warren and Brown are in a dead heat, the truth is Brown is ahead. What we don't have is a good independant handle on the extent of corruption in ballot counting. Secretary Galvin who is in charge of counting the votes does have a reputation for honesty.
In Massachusetts, unenrolled voters (those who do not declare any party affiliation) total more than Democrat and Republican voters combined. It's hard predicting how the unenrolled will vote. As for polling in Massachusetts, the media tends to skew polls by five to ten percent in favor of the left. So if the polls say Warren and Brown are in a dead heat, the truth is Brown is ahead. What we don't have is a good independant handle on the extent of corruption in ballot counting. Secretary Galvin who is in charge of counting the votes does have a reputation for honesty.
In Massachusetts, unenrolled voters (those who do not declare any party affiliation) total more than Democrat and Republican voters combined. It's hard predicting how the unenrolled will vote. As for polling in Massachusetts, the media tends to skew polls by five to ten percent in favor of the left. So if the polls say Warren and Brown are in a dead heat, the truth is Brown is ahead. What we don't have is a good independant handle on the extent of corruption in ballot counting. Secretary Galvin who is in charge of counting the votes does have a reputation for honesty.
The teleprompter version is very expensive and written in forked tongue.
Funniest thing out of the GOP in 122 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.