Skip to comments.
Republican Surrenderists for Obamacare
Michelle Malkin ^
| June 13, 2012
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 06/14/2012 2:15:23 PM PDT by Ron C.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: daler
VERY wise. NEVER EVER give a dime to the RNC. Keep all your campaign dollars local - never send it out of your own district. Keep that humming with the best you can find. If every Republican did that we would be in great shape nationally.
21
posted on
06/14/2012 3:24:17 PM PDT
by
Ron C.
To: cripplecreek
Time to look at their pensions and benefits also, making sure that people go there to serve us, not to serve themselves.
Adequate compensation for the job, not striking it rich for life.
22
posted on
06/14/2012 3:27:00 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
To: Venturer
“There is but one solution for Obamacare.
DUMP it in its entirety and start over.”
The federal government has neither a constitutional duty nor the authority to devise a program of medical care insurance for the citizenry. It does,however, have the authority needed to regulate interstate commerce, and, as regards medical insurance contracts, to remove barriers to interstate commerce while also prohibiting excessive costs of settling medical malpractice lawsuits and prohibiting nuisance lawsuits.
23
posted on
06/14/2012 3:30:41 PM PDT
by
Elsiejay
To: Ron C.
We did toss two RINOs off the national committee a few weeks back in Michigan. Saul Anuzis is one man I was happy to see gone. When they behave like democrats its time to treat them like democrats. (Anuzis has also been pushing the national popular vote)
The Michigan Republican Party (MRP) Credentials Committee voted 4-2 last night to give Mitt Romney both of the state's at-large delegates, State Policy Committee Chair Mike Cox told MIRS today.
Cox was one of two "no" votes on the committee which met via telephone, along with attorney Eric Doster The "yes" votes included GOP National Committeeman Saul Anuzis, a Romney supporter, and MRP Chair Bobby Schostak.
That would put the delegate split at 16 for Romney and 14 for Rick Santorum, after each candidate won 14 delegates apiece in those divided by Michigan's 14 congressional districts.
As MIRS first reported on Wednesday, the MRP was delaying a final decision on the delegate split until after consulting with attorneys.
Cox said that according to the MRP rules, Santorum and Romney should each get one of Michigan's two at-large delegates based on their take of the popular vote.
"I supported Mitt, but the vote was clearly wrong," Cox said of the Credentials Committee. "It's kind of like Third World voting. We published rules and then we voted to change the rules."
Because The Narrative Cannot Survive A Rewrite
24
posted on
06/14/2012 3:31:20 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: The Cajun
To some degree I like the idea of term-limits. But, the best hedge against traitorous reps is not term-limits, it is tuned-in dedicated voters.
The big problem we face is apathy among voters. But bigger than that is the fact that when we find a really good and solid conservative that the machine in DC can't pull away from conservatism, we want to keep them in office as long as they will serve.
In addition to that - a newly elected rep does NOT learn the ropes for almost two years. Some coming from state legislative experience 'get it' in far less time. Others are green as a gourd for up to two years, and have to be led around by their staff - often voting non-conservatively at the advice of others - not even knowing that they are voting on the wrong side of many issues.
25
posted on
06/14/2012 3:32:45 PM PDT
by
Ron C.
To: cripplecreek
"When they behave like democrats its time to treat them like democrats."
Amen - and pass the ammunition!
State and local politics is where we all need to concentrate our own efforts - that of keeping RINO's at bay, denying them any position of power whatsoever.
Conservatives fighting RINO's in state party structure is 'where-it's-at' - and the sooner FReepers jump into that fray and fight like hell, the sooner we'll purge the party of squishy good-for-nothings!
I spent all of my efforts at that job, and helped to toss RINO'S out of the power in CA (back when.) It was a huge battle, it cost a lot of money, but in the end we denied party seats to a host of RINO candidates - not ONE gained a seat.
26
posted on
06/14/2012 3:44:15 PM PDT
by
Ron C.
To: Ron C.
Yes, I know what you mean, term limits can be a double edge sword.
The career Rino politician is someone who stabs us in the back at critical times, but runs *right* at election time (Sheeple are sheeple and will forever have short memories).
I have to go with term limits because of that.
27
posted on
06/14/2012 3:44:15 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
To: Ron C.
28
posted on
06/14/2012 3:47:35 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
To: Elsiejay
Neither of which will ever be done due to the Insurance Lobby and the Lawyer Lobby.
Most of Congress are Lawyers. no way will they take away any money from Ambulance chasers.
29
posted on
06/14/2012 3:49:59 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: The Cajun
I like the idea of “consecutive” term limits. No more than 2 consecutive terms before a mandatory time out for at least 1 term. If the people want him back, he’ll be back.
I’ve got a great rep but I like the idea of making sure he doesn’t get too comfortable. In fact, mine is a 2 time freshman now.
30
posted on
06/14/2012 3:55:09 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Ron C.
Tea Partiers, GOP conservatives, and libertarians came together and got it done in Michigan. It enraged the old guard but it happened under rules. Keep that in mind when they squeal about Ron Paul voters “Causing trouble”.
http://www.rightmichigan.com/story/2012/5/20/104733/048
31
posted on
06/14/2012 4:04:50 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: cripplecreek
January 20, 2013, at 12:02 PM Eastern.
No fricken honeymoon.
32
posted on
06/14/2012 5:06:23 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Romney Sucks. Mutiny Now, or something.)
To: stockpirate
The sooner conservatives understand that our republican leadership are ALL Big Government, New World Order socialists the better we will al be. Do you really believe this?
It's entirely beyond rational observation and conclusion.
.
33
posted on
06/14/2012 9:07:50 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Ron C.
Wait a minute! If the guppies (Tea and RINO) couldn't "eliminate" the law against safe light bulbs, what makes anyone foolish enough to believe that they would actually eliminate deathcare?
We've been down this road several times since the class of 94 turned into the dangerous liberty-sucking crap-heads they ended up as.
The only way deathcare gets eliminated (even if the black robes declare it bogus) will be with the actual use of pitchforks and tar & feathers. Hah! Even on a good day, there aren't enough un-pussified males under the age of 50 left in the U.S. with the gonads to gave any chance of success for that.
The only possible impediment the tyrants who now rule us might have to an unblemished 1000 years is 9992Apophis.
34
posted on
06/14/2012 10:22:32 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: stockpirate
The sooner conservatives understand that our republican leadership are ALL Big Government, New World Order socialists the better we will al be. We won't be any better off, but we certainly won't look as stupid. I have said all along this is not going away no matter what the Court or presumptive new president says.
35
posted on
06/15/2012 12:27:47 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(I will not vote for Romney period.)
To: Ron C.
If McCain were President he would have passed a watered down version of Osamacare without the fascist mandate.
36
posted on
06/15/2012 12:29:42 AM PDT
by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
To: Ron C.
Covering children until age 31—who can possibly defend that?
To: Ron C.
The Big 50 State CONCENTRATED Fascist Fall Guy Plan, against every free American.
CONCENTRATING on every individual’s personal life detail. CONCENTRATION on every individuals’s VITALS, for the purpose of CONCENTRATED asset EXTRACTION.
CONCENTRATED asset EXTRACTION to base worthless Qe1, Qe2, Qe3 paper hangers, so called instruments, as having some kind of value.
CONCENTRATION CAMP, Labor-Work Camp, Arbeitsziehungslager.
“Thou Shall Not Steal.” The Word will not be mocked.
38
posted on
06/15/2012 1:17:27 AM PDT
by
Varsity Flight
(Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
To: Ron C.
You got that right! Romney is NOT going to throw out all of Obamacare. He will make some changes but he doesn’t get it..we do NOT want Ocare!
40
posted on
06/15/2012 7:07:22 AM PDT
by
katiedidit1
("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson