I dont think it was racially motivated, the doctor said. They were black, Im Asian, but I think it was something else. I think it was about having fun because they could.
It just kinda takes your breath away, doesn’t it??
What the Hell is in the water up there? Are they all daffy?
~ Larry Elder, "The Ten Things You Can't Say In America"
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
Wait until a white or asian would-be victim fire off some shots at the mob. I bet it will be “racial” then.
Let's see, she says that color doesn't matterdemonstrating that there are black-on-black crimes and black-on-white crimes. What's her point? That black kids just are this way, and attack everybody? I know she's a black Leftist, but the woman sure seems to be prejudiced against black folks.
How y’all doin’ CTC? Long time.
Seems Ms. Mitchell is looking out of the plantation window in this article, doesn’t it? She hits all the demographic complaints of us “Chicago watchers”.
Sorry, a lot of blacks view Asians as betrayers.
Most Asians intgrated well in the Western society. They worked torwards achieving their American dream, they don’t wait for the gubbmint quota (sometimes they got penalized for being certain Asian race) and free handouts.
Together with the dirty secret out in SF, conflicts between the two races are bound to rise.
Yeah, and I don't think water is wet...
Ummm...yes they are.
97+ percent of blacks voted for Zero because he was black..
At least he is half black, raised by treasonous whites.. tutored by treasonous blacks..
What do you call that “racial pride”...
Is KKK involvement “racial pride”?... or the Skin Heads..?..
Not really much difference..
Then there is the Eric Holder thing..
Institutionalized corrupt nasty well funded “racial pride”..
America seems to appear to have become Autistic...
Looking thru their fingers at the pretty light...
When these mob attackers wind up getting shot by one of their potential victims, there will be few tears shed.
If someone is attacking people at random, especially in a mob, then I have no sympathy for what may happen to them.
Wow, same logic as the KKK.
“But these mob attacks are not as simple as beating up someone because of their ethnicity.”
Oh, no. Human interactions are far too multifaceted and complex to reduce to such terms. Except for when it’s a group of whites beating up a black or straights bashing a gay. Then it’s about “hate” and nothing else.
Maybe not about the race of the victim (although that’s debatable).
But why is not much said about the race of the perps? (Besides, of course, pandering)
We start asking questions about who influences these kids and read their social media it will be found to be one step removed from the D party. Kass is right on and he has to be PC but where these kids come from the gangs are the political muscle of the precinct and the “reverends” are their straight counterpart. It really shouldn’t take much police work, but it won’t happen because if it were traced back to “community organizers” on the D payroll the Kenyan would be sent packing.
I go to ‘Detective Shaved Longcock’ for info on ChiCongo crime.
I think it goes even deeper than race.
That is, I would hazard to guess that the vast majority of these ‘youts’ were from single parent families. Why? Because children from single parent families are 60% more likely to be criminal offenders.
Why? Simple. Children from two parent families, a father and a mother, are raised for “success” in one way or another. Especially if the parents themselves are not losers.
But children from one parent families are raised in a “survival” mode, not a “success” mode. And if you think of what a “survival” mode entails, it suddenly makes sense.
It means that such children are more like primitives than they are social people. Might makes right, the strongest lead, the weaker follow, and the weakest perish. Aggression and greed are good, as are dominance and control.
It is an ugly way to live.