Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seventh Circuit Slams Plaintiffs’ Lawyers in Sears Lawsuit
Wall Street Journal ^ | 06/13/12 | Joe Palazzolo

Posted on 06/13/2012 11:06:22 AM PDT by AtlasStalled

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in no uncertain terms, spiked a derivative lawsuit filed against the board of Sears Holdings on Wednesday, ruling that it “serves no goal other than to move money from the corporate treasury to the attorneys’ coffers.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/13/2012 11:06:28 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Good for them.


2 posted on 06/13/2012 11:13:58 AM PDT by DarrellZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
...“serves no goal other than to move money from (any defendant) to the attorneys’ coffers.”

Isn't this the goal of any attorney??

3 posted on 06/13/2012 11:14:03 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Attorneys who do this crap need to have some sort of fine imposed .


4 posted on 06/13/2012 11:21:08 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
serves no goal other than to move money from the corporate treasury to the attorneys’ coffers.
Sounds just like the Agent Orange settlement: lawyers struck gold - VN vets got the shaft.
5 posted on 06/13/2012 11:23:00 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

A rare but welcomed ruling in a bogus lawsuit case. Kudos to Judge Easterbrook for his common sense decision and well-deserved rebuke to the conniving attorneys that instituted this lawsuit with the expectation of reaping a huge windfall in undeserved fees. If only we had more decisions such as this when these bogus lawsuits end up before a judge.


6 posted on 06/13/2012 11:24:14 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Who was the idiot District Court judge who let this case start?


7 posted on 06/13/2012 1:37:20 PM PDT by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
What a shame! If this had been allowed to go forward, I bet we could have filled out a three page questionnaire and gotten a coupon for 25 cents off a set of wrenches from Sears if we buy them by November 18, 2012. The lawyers would get 7 million dollars up front, of course.
8 posted on 06/13/2012 1:43:37 PM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson