Skip to comments.
Worker fired for her 'distracting' figure? (Liberals´war on modesty/religion/morals)
GMA/ Yahoo ^
| May 22, 2012
| ASHLEY JENNINGS
Posted on 05/22/2012 7:04:12 AM PDT by Righting
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Righting
They sell lingerie yet are offended by an employees attire? LOL
To: ConservativeDude
Yeah, that’s an enormous booty. Can barely see around it. Must take up two seats on an airplane...
To: circlecity
A big portion comes from cases you never hear about. She hooks up with these clients and sends the wealthy defendant a letter threatening suit. She apologizes about all the unfavorable publicity filing the suit will create and hints it will be an absolute media circus. She then points out that all this could be avoided if the defendant would just settle pre-suit and no one would ever have to hear about it. Bingo, big settlement. That's how these kind of lawyers works. Sleazy but lucrative.
Sounds like the Reverend Jackson's schtick. My brother told me about a similar thing happening to a local fast food franchise but it was along racial lines. It has been a long time but IIRC the franchisee was dealing drugs through the restaurant and the corporation was going to pull the franchise and wahlah...in comes "the Reverend Jackson" to scream discrimination and threatened bad publicity. Race pimp.
43
posted on
05/22/2012 7:45:53 AM PDT
by
copaliscrossing
(Progressives are Socialists)
To: Gettin Betta
So what? This (lingerie)is mechandise to make a living, the other is provactive sex by a live woman. Apples and oranges!!!
44
posted on
05/22/2012 7:47:03 AM PDT
by
Righting
(9)
To: Righting
(Liberals´war on modesty/religion/morals) Op I can't believe you believe this. Liberals war on modesty/religion????? Really? The company makes sexy panties and bras with sex slogans on them for cripes sake.
45
posted on
05/22/2012 7:48:11 AM PDT
by
trailhkr1
(All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
To: ETL
What is with all these pics of gross, humongous boobs??? Hope my fellow males do not find these attractive.
I'm saving this thread with a real body and a real hot woman with dem dar breeding hips.
46
posted on
05/22/2012 7:53:26 AM PDT
by
trailhkr1
(All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
To: trailhkr1
Sorry. But this is not the bigger picture. It is one thing to sell to a woman an atractive clothing (while a secular advertising publishing company might use “sexy slogans.” Lingerie that she can wear in front of her husband, e.g.) and a completely different thing: to have a live sexy figure in front of you “working” with you, daily.
47
posted on
05/22/2012 7:55:13 AM PDT
by
Righting
(9)
Seems like in every office environment, there’s one just like this chick who tries to ruin it for everyone else. That gal’s former coworkers are lucky they work for a small, local company - not a politiacally correct megabusiness with a mealy-mouthed human resources department hellbent on justifying its existance.
I worked for one of the latter. Instead of taking on the slutty dresser directly, the departmental casual dress policy got banned in favor of “more business-appropriate attire.” Everbody in the place had to replace their wardrobe. The problem worker, too: more costly skanky blouses, of course.
Doesn’t matter what line of fabrics this Native Intimates was selling. Office work calls for office attire. I feel sorry for them, tho. The tactless female manager was probably more blunt than a male would have been, and the business may throw her under the bus to save itself. Pity, that.
48
posted on
05/22/2012 7:55:13 AM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
(What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
To: Titan Magroyne
49
posted on
05/22/2012 7:56:47 AM PDT
by
Righting
(9)
To: Hegewisch Dupa
..."busting news" ... Brilliant. We need a new category.
50
posted on
05/22/2012 7:57:11 AM PDT
by
shove_it
(just undo it)
To: Righting
She works in a lingerie store and they want her to tape her breasts down? If Victoria’s Secret had their sales gals dressed in their product there’d be even MORE men in there snooping around and feeling embarrassed not to buy something.
51
posted on
05/22/2012 7:57:37 AM PDT
by
Terry Mross
("It happened. And we let it happen." Peter Griffin - FAMILY GUY)
To: Righting
To: Righting
53
posted on
05/22/2012 8:05:29 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Hold My Beer and Watch This!)
To: harwood
I’m going to go with “Big payout coming” for $500 Alex.
54
posted on
05/22/2012 8:07:49 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: Beelzebubba
another Hilary Rosen Gal ? Gloria Allred never just sues ,she has to make a FREAK SHOW out of it .Let me see ,attack on women and religion ,you can smell the Dems
To: trailhkr1
What is with all these pics of gross, humongous boobs??? Hope my fellow males do not find these attractive. The issue wasn't necessarily attractive boobs, but extremely large "distracting" ones. I, myself, do not generally find abnormally ultra-large breasts attractive. They look like freaks.
Super sweet animation you posted, btw!
Talk about distracting!......
57
posted on
05/22/2012 8:19:43 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Vigilanteman
of which picture ? I can't take a far away picture much less a close-up of Gloria Allred.
58
posted on
05/22/2012 8:25:47 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Obama - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
To: kcvl
I believe the term was “rode hard and put away wet”
59
posted on
05/22/2012 8:33:21 AM PDT
by
Paddyboy
To: homegroan
Orthodox Jews with a company called Native Intimates???
Huh? Am I missing something here? Just what do they sell? I dont get it...
___________
According to the complainant, thong panties with heart-shaped cut-outs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson