Posted on 05/13/2012 8:52:19 AM PDT by markomalley
"‘Let the games begin," Tina Brown said last week after Time Magazine released its controversial breastfeeding cover.
Brown, whose tenure as editor at Newsweek has seen an array of controversial covers, will respond with the above, pegged to Andrew Sullivan's piece on Obama's support for same-sex marriage: "The First Gay President."
The magazine is currently available on iTunes.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
>>Tsk...He’s not the first gay President. He’s the first bi one.
There’s no evidence that he’s bi. His past “girlfriends” are a composite fictional character. He’s married to a wookiee. And now Newsweek has outed him. As far as I’m concerned, he’s queer as a three dollar bill.
That information needs to get out there. I think most that run the press these days are gay reporters and all. That’s why they are so protective of BO.
LOL. LOL. LOL. Bathhouse Barry is going to have an aneurysm when he sees that.
You can take Ohio off the list of battleground states now.
I thought Obama was the 2nd gay president after James Buchanan actually, but the point remains the same.
They finally admitted he was gay.
“Time... Newsweak. They’re more like pamphlets or brochures now than magazines.”
Pamphlets and brochures are more appropriate formats for propaganda anyway.
Salute?!? Looks more like he is trying to pick his nose with his thumb.
1. ARE YOU READY TO BE A JELLYFISH
2. A FIENDISH NEW MEDIA PLOY?
4. NETWORKS GO HOLLYWOOD
{Well, they got #3 right, anyway...}
We’re all homosexuals now..?
Unreal! LOL
I jokingly said it, but the liberals mean it!
“I thought Obama was the 2nd gay president after James Buchanan actually, but the point remains the same.”
I thought Abe Lincoln was our first gay President?
If Buchanan and Lincoln were both gay, Buchanan was president right before Lincoln.
"You know your son looks like a fag to me?" "You better get married again cause he's going to wind up with somebody's blank in his mouth before you can say Jack Robinson!"
"How dare you! How dare you!"
In Obama's case.....you can say Jack Robinson, or least Larry Sinclair.
Well he got a “first” in something, I mean besides being the worst President ever. Some people have been saying he is the first “black” President, but almost everyone knows that Bill(Bubba) Clinton was the first black POTUS.
I can’t. I get a 504 error.
From the DUmp. LOL
ruggerson 7 min ago #11
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:56 AM
Star Member monmouth (18,997 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. Since the President himself is not gay, “Pro-Gay President” would be more exact..n/t
View profile
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:03 AM
Star Member targetpractice
2. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. n/t
View profile
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:07 AM
Star Member PCIntern
3. WTF???
View profile
Last edited Sun May 13, 2012, 11:10 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I know..I’m dreaming...a well-meaning fourth grade student was allowed to write the copy for the cover of an internationally distributed magazine...or...DC Comics has a new Bizarro World mag disguised for April Fools...
Jesus...no, i’m awake. Did someone tell Michelle about this, or like Rudy Giuliani’s wife, who apparrently didn’t know she was getting a divorce, did she have to hear this stuff from the media?
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:08 AM
Star Member tridim
4. And many more “firsts” to come!
View profile
The next 4 years are going to be amazing.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to tridim (Reply #4)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:16 AM
Star Member BlancheSplanchnik
8. I believe so :)
View profile
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:10 AM
Star Member Poll_Blind
5. IMO, this appears to be a riff on Bill Clinton being “The First Black President”
View profile
I’m not entirely sure most people will “get it”.
PB
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to Poll_Blind (Reply #5)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:12 AM
Star Member PCIntern
7. Out of tune riff , if you ask me... n/t
View profile
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to PCIntern (Reply #7)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:19 AM
Star Member Poll_Blind
10. Yeah, I kind of agree. Beltway folks and politicos will get it almost certainly...
View profile
...but it’s going to cause the same sort of “Whaaa?” reaction from people that that goddamned awful New Yorker cover did, with Obama and his wife dressed up like terrorists, fist-bumping in the Oval Office did.
PB
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to Poll_Blind (Reply #5)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:16 AM
Star Member tridim
9. It’s pretty clever
View profile
Especially since he is the actual first black President.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:11 AM
Star Member malthaussen
6. Wonder what Michelle will think of that.
View profile
n/t
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:21 AM
Star Member ruggerson
11. I would hazard a guess that this won’t go over well with some people
View profile
He probably illegally modified the computer to do that. The Feds will on his doorstep very soon.
Thanks for that link (post #27). Very interesting.
Maybe they got “gay” together?
Maybe they got “gay” together?
First, that halo needs a pair of hands grasping it and setting it on his head. If you know what I mean and I think you do.
Second, if Andrew is going to call Barry the first gay president, is he now going to say Sasha and Malia aren’t really Barry’s daughters? Or is that particular accusation a one-candidate deal?
LOL!!! I think this cover is a huge blunder on Newsweek’s part. This cover is open to misinterpretation . . . hee.
Pleeeeeease tell me this magazine is still sold as a POS item at grocery store checkouts coast to coast...staring at that while unloading your cart on to the belt should bring in the votes...LOLOL!
If they pull this cover now; the queers will squeal like stuck pigs; accusing Newsweek of caving to intolerant, right-wing extremists.
Get the popcorn...
Not for long. Together with Time they can just muster enough pages to hold the covers apart.
Gotta admit though, for a man, the first wookie pulls off the woman thing fairly well. Context....
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Why in tarnation do people still buy magazines?
It's no different than having a wad of dirty paper, full of two day old news thrown on your driveway.
Oh look, the magazine and newspaper are here along with all the junkmail. I can finally read about what they want me to read about.
Amazing...
Funny how so few are addressing the blasphemy angle...
My time is being spent helping Conservatives to get elected to the House and Senate, and doing everything I can to support our troops.
Please read here and spread to others. Thanks!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2787107/posts?q=1&;page=102#102
theulstermanreport.com
Women can be bi.....
....men who do it with men are faggots.
LOL! Unfortunately I live in New York city and that fool is coming here today to be fawned over by those cows on The View tv show, then he’s giving a speech to a bunch of dykes I assume about killing babies and faggatry, then he’s hitting one fundraiser after another basically shutting down the entire city so it will take everyone 10000 hours to get to and from work. And he was here only a few weeks ago doing the same crap. On one hand I like it because it punishes the hell out of all the turds who votes for this queer. But on the other hand I gotta suffer through this sh#t as well.
Why do these idiotic magazines continue to publish the news as if it occurred a week later than it actually did?
The world could end on May 20, and we wouldn't know it because news magazines are publishing a week late (or a week early, depending on how you look at it). Stupid practice in this day and age.
Thanks for the ping! This is one of the funniest examples of tone deaf liberal media ever. I love it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.