Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Gay $$$.
1 posted on 05/09/2012 4:12:37 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

Any other candidate besides Romney would tear into Obama about this and maybe Romney can find some surrogates who still will. The polls are on our side here and a savvy pol would use it to his advantage.


2 posted on 05/09/2012 4:15:47 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yes he did it for money. Also Obama has gone all in on a leftist revolution reelection policy. He should lose, but if he wins God help us all.


3 posted on 05/09/2012 4:16:58 PM PDT by Williams (Nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

With or without this issue, he’s burnt toast. HE carries too much baggage; I think it’ll be a 45 state sweep. We have had enough. period. Loved Rush’s rant this afternoon. sd


4 posted on 05/09/2012 4:17:13 PM PDT by shotdog (I love my country. It's our government I'm afraid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wrote last week....Obama really doesn’t want a second term. Michelle hates DC and dealing with whites.


5 posted on 05/09/2012 4:17:53 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s another attempted distraction. This will be his game plan. Don’t let the focus be on the economy. People will fall for it.


6 posted on 05/09/2012 4:19:53 PM PDT by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

No doubt about it. He makes the calculation and concludes the money is more important than the loss of some democrat social conservative votes.


7 posted on 05/09/2012 4:20:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Obama’s decision unleashed fresh excitement among gay and lesbian donors, already one of the largest sources of campaign money for the president’s reelection."

Gay $$$

Exactly.

9 posted on 05/09/2012 4:21:12 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Presidential Race is about the relative light reflectivity of your Slavemaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

D-E-S-P-A-R-A-T-I-O-N


12 posted on 05/09/2012 4:30:03 PM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Simple:

1. Axelrod knows Obama was (still is?) homosexual. They knew who the guys were (and are).

2. Barry's handlers have the same GAYDAR we FReepers do and they saw the same effeminate behavior, the whistling of his 's's, the trowing like a girl, and they also knew he spent 13 years on the mainland, 10 before meeting Moochie, and they couldn't come up with even one woman willing to say Barry and slipped her the man-meat. Barry is as queer as any homo you'll ever meet. But since DC and the lamestreet media is absolutely jammed with queers, they could count on a cover-up. They couldn't afford Barry being outed in 2007, so they punted.

3. Now it doesn't really matter. After yesterday they decided to push up his 'announcement' to today. This was all done to deflect suspicion about being a homo away from him. Now his re-election is in real trouble and they figured they'd play that card for the money and to try and shore up the base assholes of the DemonRat party! Won't do him any good though because we are going to CRUSH him November. Then he and Reggie can pack all the fudge they want!

14 posted on 05/09/2012 4:38:13 PM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Blacks have told me that they do not like the gay rights movement, because they feel it dilutes the meaning of civil rights. They simply do not want to acknowledge a section of affluent white people as being discriminated against.

In their minds, people can see that they are black, so racists can easily find them and discriminate, but no one can tell that you are gay unless you open your mouth.

So this may seem like a risky move for keeping blacks, but in this election where else are they going to go? It would have been a risky move for a white president, because the black vote would have resisted it, but not so much for a black president.

17 posted on 05/09/2012 4:39:43 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
A downscale white voter in Ohio who was already leaning against the president might lean a little bit more against him now.

Geesh!

18 posted on 05/09/2012 4:41:21 PM PDT by wvguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
more pandering to the filthy 2% of voters he's going to get anyway
20 posted on 05/09/2012 4:51:40 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I doubt he’s risking much of anything as long as the votes are counted by a Soros owned company. Let’s face it folks: we’re screwed until we come up with enough guts to actually fight back... and I’m not referring to voting or debating.


21 posted on 05/09/2012 4:59:59 PM PDT by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I am SHOCKED that Obama made this dumb of a move.

The general election just went from a tossup/lean Obama to Romney’s to lose. And in one fell swoop Obama just secured the entire South for Romney, something that Romney could NEVER have done on his own.

Thanks Obama :)


23 posted on 05/09/2012 5:37:40 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yet another issue that Romney cannot challenge him on. Mitt says he’s against it now but his governorship record tells another story.

Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I’ll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.


25 posted on 05/09/2012 6:33:00 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I'll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; All

Whatever states that don’t yet have a gay marriage amendment on their November ballot need to get one on it.

That could serve to peel off some votes.........


26 posted on 05/09/2012 6:41:07 PM PDT by TheRobb7 (Remember, JimRob called a truce....not a surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson