Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney’s Eldest Son Has Twins Via Surrogate
ABC News ^ | May 4, 2012 | Emily Friendman

Posted on 05/04/2012 2:07:33 PM PDT by madprof98

O’HARA, Pa. – Tagg Romney, the eldest son of presidential candidate Mitt Romney, announced via Twitter that he and his wife Jen have new twin boys, delivered by a surrogate today.

“Happy 2 announce birth of twin boys David Mitt and William Ryder. Big thanks to our surrogate. Life is a miracle,” Tagg tweeting, linking to a photo of himself and one of his new sons.

This the second time that Tagg, 42, and his wife, Jen,39, have used a surrogate. The same surrogate was used for the twins carried their youngest son Jonathan, who was born in August of 2010. Their other three children were not born via surrogacy.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ivf; liberalsonparade; moralabsolutes; romney; surrogate; taggromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last
To: Reddy

I will say this again, babies conceived due to rapes are NATURAL and should be respected, protected, and nurtured.

Now, that is out of the system, a traditional conception has to be natural. If it is unnatural, is cannot be traditional.

” They are not artificial children.”

These children’s so-called “parents” donated their cellular material to a doctor, who took it, played with the cells, and then implanted the cells into a rented-womb. Thus, AI produces AC.


61 posted on 05/04/2012 3:09:44 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

They “used” a surrogate. A revealing choice of words.


62 posted on 05/04/2012 3:11:19 PM PDT by buridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Yeah...Hate is a bit non-traditional.


63 posted on 05/04/2012 3:11:19 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

A whole lot of anger recently. I think it’s time to unplug for a while. Take care and thanks for the comment.


64 posted on 05/04/2012 3:11:57 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Finally a voice of reason. Thank you.


65 posted on 05/04/2012 3:12:15 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

The problem is that most Christians and Jews accept how ever many children the Lord blesses them with, whether one or five ir none.

Mormons are not Christians and don’t trust on God. They assume they are gods in the making, and creators of life. Big difference.


66 posted on 05/04/2012 3:18:01 PM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Thank you for that.

And thank you for not expressing yourself in a hateful way.

I am Catholic and agree and understand.

When people come across as “pious’, it irritates me. I think when, as a young boy, my Dad called Teddy Kennedy a “Pious bastard” and explained it to me, I caught on.


67 posted on 05/04/2012 3:18:45 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna
I guess the Mormons don’t believe in adoption.

Speaking as a Mormon with 4 "biological" children and 5 adopted children... hmmm.

P.S. - the article says "A special thanks to our gestational surrogate who made this possible for us." What does that mean? After their bio kids could they have no more conventionally and so used surrogacy to have more?

68 posted on 05/04/2012 3:20:23 PM PDT by PoolQue ("The best government is that which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Or maybe a 39 year old woman doesn’t have the eggs to become pregnant? I’m not a Mitt fan, but this is an ignorant statement.


69 posted on 05/04/2012 3:22:56 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Good point Sarge. The fact is, there was another woman involved, the woman whose womb was used. This is a violation of all Judeo-Christian principles of monogamy in marriage.

Those children have two mothers! The genetic mother, and the mother who carried them for nine months.


70 posted on 05/04/2012 3:23:18 PM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sagar

From: INSTRUCTION ON RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE IN ITS ORIGIN
AND ON THE DIGNITY OF PROCREATION

3. IS “SURROGATE”* MOTHERHOOD MORALLY LICIT?

No, for the same reasons which lead one to reject heterologous artificial fertilization: for it is contrary to the unity of marriage and to the dignity of the procreation of the human person. Surrogate motherhood represents an objective failure to meet the obligations of maternal love, of conjugal fidelity and of responsible motherhood; it offends the dignity and the right of the child to be conceived, carried in the womb, brought into the world and brought up by his own parents; it sets up, to the detriment of families, a division between the physical, psychological and moral elements which constitute those families.

* By “surrogate mother” the Instruction means:

a) the woman who carries in pregnancy an embryo implanted in her uterus and who is genetically a stranger to the embryo because it has been obtained through the union of the gametes of “donors”. She carries the pregnancy with a pledge to surrender the baby once it is born to the party who commissioned or made the agreement for the pregnancy.

b) the woman who carries in pregnancy an embryo to whose procreation she has contributed the donation of her own ovum, fertilized through insemination with the sperm of a man other than her husband. She carries the pregnancy with a pledge to surrender the child once it is born to the party who commissioned or made the agreement for the pregnancy.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html


71 posted on 05/04/2012 3:23:18 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madprof98; All

To everybody on here trying to rip them a new one, what if his wife has a problem with her uterus and is unable to bring a child to term; and doing so would cause her death?

What is wrong with you people?


72 posted on 05/04/2012 3:23:34 PM PDT by wastedyears (There can be only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

It is not a gift, they bought children. What next?


73 posted on 05/04/2012 3:26:37 PM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna; All
Surrogate motherhood or Rent-a- womb, is going against God’s will. Most evangelicals, Catholics, and orthodox Jews are against this practice.

And this is exactly why I don't identify with any mainstream religion. How could you say such a morally bankrupt and cold-hearted thing? If you found out your husband was sterile, would you leave him because he couldn't make babies with you? What would you do if you found out that carrying a child to term would kill you? Leave all your friends and family and become a recluse in the mountains?

We look like DU right now on this thread. How any of you could say such things about people is beyond me.

74 posted on 05/04/2012 3:30:09 PM PDT by wastedyears (There can be only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

“Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.”

Well you went to the core of the problem...wonder where the name came from?


75 posted on 05/04/2012 3:30:47 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: buridan
They “used” a surrogate. A revealing choice of words.

****************************

Exactly right.

76 posted on 05/04/2012 3:31:06 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.
**************************************************

Don’t laugh there are those who think just that and it has to be in the dark and they have to have their night clothes on. Anyone who would do that different is depraved and perverted and going to L.

Note: I am terribly perverted.


77 posted on 05/04/2012 3:31:45 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator

I was against Romney in 2008, and I’m against him again this time. But that doesn’t mean I’m going to rail against his son and daughter-in-law for the way they had children. To do such a thing is morally bankrupt and comparable to Liberals praising abortion as a woman’s right.


78 posted on 05/04/2012 3:34:16 PM PDT by wastedyears (There can be only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sagar

“Thus, AI produces AC.”

Artificial insemination produces artificial children?

I’m done.


79 posted on 05/04/2012 3:34:59 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sagar

So by your logic, my cousin who got a donor heart is ‘unnatural’ and should be dead because it came from science?


80 posted on 05/04/2012 3:35:20 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson