Skip to comments.Dan Savage "We Should Acknowledge The Existence of Good Pedophiles”
Posted on 04/29/2012 10:12:24 PM PDT by Maelstorm
(Excerpt) Read more at rpvnetwork.org ...
savage is a domestic enemy and obama and his staff thinks he is a spokesman. He is a spokesman all right—one who reveals evil and calls it good.
The guy is bad enough without making up stuff. Someone else (Dr James Cantor) was saying that in the column.
Pedophilia is legal and accepted in many countries, especially muslim countries. After all their prophet married a 6 yr old girl.
Maybe right now in Savage’s book the “good pedophile” is one who keeps his hands off of kids and only entertains it in his mind... but we know where this is headed. This isn’t a screed about sin and temptation and salvation. Next up, there will be “good molestations.”
The only good pedophile is a dead one.
The only good pedophile is a dead pedophile..
I hope the Indians will excuse me for diggin up that old saying.
A good pedophile is like the clean end of a turd
What a judgmental attitude for you to have.The good pedophiles are the ones who vote Rat...who work for ACORN...who donate to Planned Barrenhood...who are scoutmasters in the Boy Scouts.
Catholic priests,on the other hand....
We are the enemy..........got it!
He is an over the top drama queen who constantly throws perversion in your face and then calls you intolerant when you call it exactly what it is.
By Savages own logic a good homosexual, would be like a good pedophile, he would not act on his urges and desires.........toss that back at him and watch perverted heads explode every where!
I've seen this, I've had it invade my home for holidays and vacations, the only way to deal with it is to ban it from your home.
By the way ny step son admitted in one of his "coherent" drunken moments that his first homosexual experience was at 13 with a former 35 year old neighbor.
I'm not being flippant.
That's not a pedophile, that's a typical packer "chicken hawk" (pederast)
Everyone knows that an addict is the last person to trust, and pedophiles are like the worst of the worst in that type of abomination.
That being said, in general, it is time we take care of our own before these murderers start taking care of us for good.
Indeed, we are being assaulted by yet another cult of pseudo-charity that attacks life and real charity as a mask for murder.
Welcome to humanist language and socialist decay.
It started with feminism, the pill, condoms and the abortion aberation as a means to false charity.
Its coming; not to worry.
I keep looking up, expecting the big asteroid.
> What is a “good pedophile”?
A “good pedophile” is a dead pedophile.
Just look to Europe where the homosexual agenda has been embraced.
They have already lowered the age of consent to 13 in western countries like Spain.
Like most liberals, they know how to win through incrementalism. First, gay marriage, then lower age of consent, then legalize pedophilia.
Yes, but there needs to be two other distinctions as well.
1) There needs to be research to understand the “shades of gray”. Using just age of the victim as the sole criteria fails the “Traci Lords” test, but appearance criteria fails as well because of adult women who look underage, the “Little Lupe” test.
2) The flip side of this is the corruption of natural sexual attraction between adults, becomes adults attracted to children, as well as distinguishing those who are just attracted from those who do something about that attraction which is illegal. Should “Toddlers & Tiaras” be illegal? Using children as fashion models?
3) Then there is “organic” pedophilia, either physical (brain aberration), psychopathic or sociopathic.
However, despite all the above, society does not and should not in any way tolerate pedophilia based on the “We know it when we see it” criteria. It can only be parsed to a limited extent, and then only to determine the relative severity of punishments, including surgical correction.
THey are twisting the “cast the first stone” issue, which applies to hypocrites who litteraly punish the child with sex acts on them. It is totally disgusting rhetoric. Merely talking about “good pedophiles” should bring child porn charges by the subject matter itself and admission of intent of harm under an umbrella of “social acceptance”, also known as collective/government intimidation.
What is sought here is total submission to government and force also. This is the psychobable of Obama’s friends, and Obama is suspected in having been raped as a child. So, his group of people have trained him to make it an agenda of equality.
Indeed, if one does not know a cure for these kinds of things, which there are none, because it is a matter of straight control and coward domination evil in addition to adulterous sin (ie. a rebellion of the possessed against any cure if there was one), then the subject which is not at peace needs to be shot and be made at peace. I do not see these people pushing Euthanasia for these kinds of people, and though I am against Euthanasia, I am not against using it in this case, and this is why we have the death penalty.
THese people KNOW they are wrong and they KNOW they hurt others, regardless of their own “personal feelings” etc. THey know the latter is not even the point but they will keep trying to make others believe this is the case, having no regards what so ever for the “feelings of others”. THe slave of the flesh and for the flesh only is a sicko.
What is most sinister in this is the islam angle. It’s obvious that tyranny, laziness, idleness and the pedophile mindset go hand in hand, and Marxists and fascists for welfare have affinities for this. In their circles it’s one of those beliefs that everyone is a pedophile but cannot admit it. Their minds are blind dangerous craters of immorality. I would not keep a set of keys near a seemingly “nice gay guy”. Satan was/is gay.
Sometimes I cannot help but see Romney types trying to make an industrial buck out of liberalism and using crazies and druggies on the street to push that on us. It makes one wonder: the left is being exploited by callous greedy GOP-E, and, yet, the left is also provoking us to side with them on their terms of perversion against the GOP-E, while blackmailing us if we ever sided with them that way.
We need to figure a way to get this crap out of the closet, and not these meek measures of “if only the laws were different etc...” They are looking for a shot, a reason to enforce this stuff for real. It is obvious that ultimately politics requires force of arms.
I agree this fag also has a show on MTV where he coaches college students on sex and relationships. Vile disgusting human..
Indeed, people know what is needed to bring peace and harmony. The cures are here, but there is this incredible unwillingness to seek them. Modernity has transformed people into some really weak individuals who enforce it with forces of arms and smart weapons.
Movies like Matrix are full of such subtle innuendos.
Teleprompting... this is what happens when an extremely weak person is provided with words, rhetoric, a TV broadcast system and force of government arms to protect them or allow them to wield this blob of “electrical mush” that their brains have become, garbage in, garbage out: theirs is a bizarro world of pseudo-progress, pseudo-advance, pseudo dressing, pseudo-logic, pseudo-science, pseudo-justice and pseudo-charity (pseudo-everything nihilists like Zero).
I agree....I am SO ready to go Home!
Good the more he speaks the more he draws attention to what is wrong with homosexuality - it is grounded in godlessness and child molestation. That’s the goal and they’re using the schools and the media to get our children.
I agree with the statement.
He says a “good” pedophile is one who NEVER acts upon his sexual inclination.
Much as a “good” kleptomaniac would be one with the pathological impulse to steal - but does not.
As a Christian I find it hard to recommend suicide - but to those with that sort of impulse (and I don’t mean kleptomania) - I am tempted.
Let me start by saing I think Dan Savage is a vile bully. However, if you read the article, I think that is what he is saying. The "good pedophile" is the one who never acts on his urges and keeps himself out of situations with kids. Savage buys into the idea that the sex drive to like children is some type of chemical or physiological imbalance and not a choice. And that this imbalance can be treated and dealt with by not putting oneself in the wrong situations (like babysitting kids).
The irony of ironies is that the same can be said of homosexuality -- that it is some type of physiological imbalance that can be treated and dealt with by not putting oneself in tempting situations. Of course, Savage would never give that advice to a gay man because homosexuality is "natural". Then why is he giving it to a pedophile?
There’s a reason Hitler knowingly allowed gays in the ranks of the SA during his rise to power....a gay in position of authority is more ruthless than even their heterosexual counterparts....of course Hitler knew once he achieved power they would be a thorn in his side, so he had them done away with in “The Night of the Long Knives.”
Mmmm......where have I heard that term before. :)
No, what Savage is doing is redefining the arguement. He’s getting you to accept that not all sexual sins are bad. For example, accepting that a man may be a pedophile but if he’s not acting on it, he’s good.
It’s a thin edge of the wedge. The moment it becomes acceptable to fantasize, it’s a small step to reality.
Perhaps having pictures of children being abused is all right, because the act was done and you can’t do anything about that. But because you “only” have pictures, you’re keeping yourself from actually harming children.
Then it won’t be but a small step from just having pictures to lightly molesting them, because there’s no actual penetration or something.
Eventually, no limits on what you can do with kids will become the norm.
This is why, even traces of, pedophilia should not be tolerated and should be subject to the fullest punishment of the law.
Pedophile, homophobe, these are medical terms politicized... it’s garbage. What now? Pedophileophobes?
These people hate children because they require a type of respect and charity they do not want to undertake or be tested by.
Many thieves and taxers want to appear like they do it for the children, yet they hate the children they have to prove they must care for. THus laws are being relaxed for the corruption of the government.
This is totally unconstitutional imbalance of power, of course, and self destructive.
There are no doubt folks who have urges but control them, no matter what they are, homosexuality, group sex, animal sex, and even pedophilia. By controlling their urges they show that human beings are not merely animals ruled by their urges. Every man or woman who’s had an opportunity to cheat with someone they found attractive has showed they can control their biological urges, this however is completely counter to the leftist agenda.
I have no doubt there are people out there with urges, all kinds, that never act on them and willfully avoid situations that will place them in undo situations. Irrespective of what those urges may be. The left doesn’t want personal restraint or accountability to be in play because it puts the lie to their world view.
I am no fan of Dan Savage, he’s a gay activist nutjob who coined the term “manogamish” for crying out loud, however, the general premise there are people in this world with sick urges who do not act on them, is I believe an accurate one.
This article, written by Dan Savage, brings to mind a gay man having sex with a young boy and people -- rightfully -- have a very negative reaction to that. But pedophilia also is an adult man like Jerry Lee Lewis marrying a 14 year old girl. Or popular songs from the 60s and 70s where an adult singer sang about bedding a 16 year old girl. Or how many times do we have a thread here about a 30-something, cute, female teacher bedding one of her teenage students? Everyone thinks that is hilarious and wishes that they had teachers like that. Guess what? That teacher is a pedophile.
Everyone needs to control their urges to do wrong things. Mere thought is not a crime if the person does not act on their urges. But if they do, and it something as bad as pedophilia, then society should punish them harshly.
Where does Savage go to speak next? We should keep track of this pedophile-apologist’s activities in Obama’s Public Schools.
Can these good pedophiles start with his son?
Can these good pedophiles start with his son?
I wonder what his reaction would be if someone gave a speech talking about acknowledging the existence of good homphobes. I suspect it’d be rather...colorful.
and right there he has shown what the ultimate goal is of the homosexual agenda and we still have ignorant dopes on our side not caring about social issues or saying”I know some and they’re nice “ or” I don’t care who marries who”
the fraud named Hannity said this too.
So for any dopes on our side who have the couldn’t careless attitude to their agenda then wake the hell up and stop supporting their ultimate goal and yes letting them marry is helping them
just said the same.
The ultimate goal for the homosexuals is to have sex with little boys and sadly we have dopes and fools on our side who say they couldn’t careless about homo’s marrying or they could’t careless about social issues.
Dan and his husband have a son?
Then his nephew.
That’s bad news waiting to happen there. I’m libertarian on a lot of matters, but I do not support gay adoption, especially of boys - at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.