Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Perry Endorses Mitt Romney
myfoxla.com ^ | April 25 2012

Posted on 04/25/2012 6:01:44 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Texas Gov. Rick Perry originally endorsed Newt Gingrich as the top candidate after dropping out of the Republican presidential race.

But with Gingrich set to quit the campaign trail, Perry on Wednesday evening gave his support to the probable nominee, Mitt Romney.

"Mitt Romney has earned the Republican presidential nomination through hard work, a strong organization, and [a] disciplined message of restoring America after nearly four years of failed job-killing policies from President [Barack] Obama and his administration," Perry said in a statement provided to FOX News Channel.

"So today I join the many conservative Republicans across the nation in endorsing Mitt Romney for president and pledge to him, my constituents and the Republican Party that I will continue to work hard to help defeat President Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxla.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2012endorsements; 2102; endorsements; furp; goawayperry; larazarick; mitt; mittromney; oops; perry; perry2012; perry4illegals; rickperry; tx2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-367 next last
To: NoLibZone
I thought Perry would have made a good Secretary of Defense in Newt's administration while he sucked up Ginga for that memory problem...

Might as well face it folks, the only principle that drives politicians is getting elected/reelected.

The only way to take the country back is to elect Conservatives not politicians.

21 posted on 04/25/2012 6:21:26 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I wonder what the response here will be when Newt endoses Romney.


22 posted on 04/25/2012 6:24:01 PM PDT by hirn_man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Geez Louise, I knew it would come, but I didn’t think it would come so soon. Ugh.

At least I know he hated doing it, LOL.


23 posted on 04/25/2012 6:24:30 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kolb
Horseshit....in the end, you must support whoever is running against Soros and the DNC.

This "I'm staying at home" bull is beyond stupid.

We've got a very, very old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for crying out loud.

24 posted on 04/25/2012 6:24:48 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walked into a bar; barkeep said "Hi Mitt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

At least he didn’t stab Newt in the back like Cain.


25 posted on 04/25/2012 6:25:57 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Then dont, and feel better about yourself.


26 posted on 04/25/2012 6:26:39 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

>>This “I’m staying at home” bull is beyond stupid.

We’ve got a very, very old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for crying out loud. <<

And this, we’ll concentrate on the Congress, let Obama win, crap has got to stop as well.

Maybe it’s me, and maybe I just pay attention but has anyone seen the amount of “executive orders” that have come from this Marxist President?

At least with Mitt the Ken doll he will give a thought to the rules and the constitution. With BO, we are freakin’ lost.


27 posted on 04/25/2012 6:29:21 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

Amen.


28 posted on 04/25/2012 6:29:53 PM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Rove and the Bushes don't like Perry. He is Tea..but not good enough for uninformed FReepers.

That's why a lot of Texans have disappeared from around here and took their money with them..

29 posted on 04/25/2012 6:31:44 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hirn_man

It should be fun. Tune in to FR next Tuesday to see the excitement.


30 posted on 04/25/2012 6:32:58 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Yeah, ‘nother DC Insider Sellout, like Santorum and Newt.


31 posted on 04/25/2012 6:33:47 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

So you like Rove?


32 posted on 04/25/2012 6:33:59 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks NoLibZone.


33 posted on 04/25/2012 6:35:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Exactly, the point of a political party, in the American system, is to win. That is why they cover a larger segment of the ideological spectrum. If the spectrum is shrunk, then you end up with a fringe party, who under our Constitution, have no impact on policy making. In a parliamentary system a fringe party can win 8% of the vote and have influence within coalition governments. Our system does not work that way.
100 years ago the spectrum of left to right spanned both parties. That is why you had a LaFollette as a Republican. Today the left and right have sorted themselves out, with far less exceptions than the past. Despite the sorting out, the two parties are geared to win. That is to win 50%+. In order to win, differant factions within the party have to come together. If they split off into splinter parties, then each splinter will lose and lose and lose. That is the way the Founding Fathers intended it to be. They might not have written this into the Constitution, but the same men created the first two political parties. The original Republicans (now the Democrats) had to balance the interests of the Southern plantation owner with those of the Northern small businessman. They were so successful at this that they eventually destroyed their rivals that we had briefly a one party state during the Monroe administration.


34 posted on 04/25/2012 6:36:38 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

No, no, say it ain’t so. Not Sarah ! Not St. Sarah. Not Santissima Sara, Wonderwoman incarnate. No, Sarah will never, ever, never-ever sell us out. Sarah a RINO? Impossible.

[Fingers in ears] Not listening, not listening, not listening, not listening. If I don’t hear Sarah’s sellout when she sells out does that mean she didn’t do it?

Not Sarah.


35 posted on 04/25/2012 6:37:04 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Ya just knew the Republican party insiders would support another liberal.


36 posted on 04/25/2012 6:38:15 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

No, no, say it ain’t so. Not Sarah ! Not St. Sarah. Not Santissima Sara, Wonderwoman incarnate. No, Sarah will never, ever, never-ever sell us out. Sarah a RINO? Impossible.

[Fingers in ears] Not listening, not listening, not listening, not listening. If I don’t hear Sarah’s sellout when she sells out does that mean she didn’t do it?

Not Sarah.


37 posted on 04/25/2012 6:39:00 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom; lonestar

That is exactly the type of silly behavior that lonestar was talking about


38 posted on 04/25/2012 6:39:06 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw; All

“Would Ron Paul be better than Romney?”

Paul might be a bit of a nut on foreign policy but at least Ron Paul is not a lying charlatan.

“As the Knife Turns” - Mitt Romney Represents Betrayal
http://youtu.be/r9sYgYY9rIc


39 posted on 04/25/2012 6:40:33 PM PDT by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Actually our system is much the same. The difference is that we have coalitions within two large parties. They have many small parties who make up, almost invariably, a majority coalition and a minority or opposition coalition.

There’s good and bad in both systems.


40 posted on 04/25/2012 6:41:24 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson