Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources close to Newt Gingrich say he will end his bid for the GOP presidential nomination next week
CNN ^ | April 25, 2012 | CNN

Posted on 04/25/2012 7:18:48 AM PDT by Gennie

Newt Gingrich to officially end bid for Republican presidential nomination and back Mitt Romney, sources tell CNN.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stteapartyrun; 1sttprun4president; buhbyenoot; cnn; fung; gingrich; newt; newt4mitt; newt4romney; newtbots4romney; newtgingrich; nomination; notbreakingnews; presidential; spoilernewt; toast; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-310 next last
To: dinodino
Too bad. Guess I won’t cast a vote for a Presidential candidate.

61 posted on 04/25/2012 7:48:24 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
If the illegal Kenyan gets reelected and declares Martial law, for the next 4 years, who will be in the position to stop him? He already said he will bypass the other branches of government.
62 posted on 04/25/2012 7:49:18 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh; Diogenesis
Not everything is a conspiracy. Newt is simply out of money and out of time. You don’t have to like it, but it’s the truth.

That's what happened to Santorum as well. He could not raise enough money to keep things going.

63 posted on 04/25/2012 7:49:36 AM PDT by Ingtar (When I donate to FR, it does not take the money and run as every politician I donate to does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

You just agreed with point 8. You didn’t dispute it at all.


64 posted on 04/25/2012 7:49:48 AM PDT by arderkrag ("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

And if somehow Mitt does win, there goes any chance to nominate a Conservative in 2016.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Exactly. And Mitt as CinC will be a kick in the crotch to what’s left of the Tea Party.


65 posted on 04/25/2012 7:50:55 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Yeah, I was going to vote for Jesus, but then I realized he wasn’t “Natural Born,” so there went my third party candidate...

Andrew Breitbart has me rethinking my position:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lbycMtTUDfE#t=734s

Cheers


66 posted on 04/25/2012 7:50:57 AM PDT by DoctorBulldog (Obama Sucks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

If Gerald Ford won in 76, would we have gotten Reagan?


67 posted on 04/25/2012 7:52:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Ha ha.

Good ones...not.

Santorum was in it all the way too.

He said they would have to add rooms on the WH to accommodate his large family.

He never let on that PA was going to be his waterloo.

That was a fact, unless he could overwhelm Romney enough to win that politically odd and tough state, without going deeply into debt just to try, with no guarantee of winning.

And it was fact that he could not ABIDE losing that state AGAIN, nor AFFORD to fight Romney for it.

He KNEW it.

His minions didn’t know it.

You will pretend not to know it, but I have no reason to pretend.

One more thing...he also KNEW that his delegate performance was poor, relative to his popular votes and his votes in caucus states.

Romney and Paul clean up in delegates.

Santorum WON the state of MO, but he will come away with only 7 of its 52 delegates, and ultimately even those pitiful few will support Romney.

This is just one example of many, that he had to know as this campaign unfolded.

That his minions never did understand.

And he didn’t clue them in, and he hurt Newt every second he stayed in on the power mainly of Evangelicals and radio talk show hosts.

Meanwhile, PA was a drop dead date.

He understood, even if his minions didn’t.

That’s why I played around with your “jackass” perjoritive directed at Newt, but you had Santorum in the same post and I thought, let’s reorder the words and get this RIGHT.


68 posted on 04/25/2012 7:53:18 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I just don’t get it. He’s been dead in the water for months. Why now? Why not keep his word and stay in until the Convention.

The money has dried up. After last night, who is left to donate? It is clear there is no path for Newt to the nomination or some brokered/contested convention. His talk about keeping it close or winning Delaware turned out to be a complete embarrassment since he lost by almost 30 points. Even most die-hards were not going to give anymore to what is obviously a pointless effort. Gingrich is simply out of money and will use the next week to make nice with Willard and hopefully get some help paying down his debt.

69 posted on 04/25/2012 7:53:22 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

If he couldn’t get it, Santorum couldn’t either.


70 posted on 04/25/2012 7:53:42 AM PDT by Pinkbell (Woo hoo! Another moderate candidate! Thanks GOP and voters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I was planning the same thing... Not voting for Romney under any circumstances. However, this all changed when the SC took up Obamacare.

If Barack gets more liberal justices on the court, it is GAME OVER.


71 posted on 04/25/2012 7:54:15 AM PDT by vlad335
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

What?

Look again.

“A Marxist rubber stamp is not as dangerous as a Marxist lame duck.”

Let’s ID the players here.

Marxist rubber stamp = Mitt.
Marxist lame duck = Obama.

I have - am - and will continue to argue that Mitt will be more dangerous than Obama.

Lets put this another way....

“A Marxist rubber stamp is MORE dangerous THAN a Marxist lame duck.”


72 posted on 04/25/2012 7:54:47 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: vlad335

What’s the difference between RomneyCare and ObamaCare?


73 posted on 04/25/2012 7:55:20 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

I voted in the PA primary yesterday. Rick and Newt were still on the ballot. I voted for Newt.

Rick would have gotten my vote if other states hadn’t already eliminated him.


74 posted on 04/25/2012 7:56:22 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
What’s the difference between RomneyCare and ObamaCare? Romneycare came from Heritage Foundation. There! Found one difference.
75 posted on 04/25/2012 7:57:56 AM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Then it is congress’s duty to impeach him or the whole bunch should be thrown out in their collective asses.


76 posted on 04/25/2012 7:58:00 AM PDT by cableguymn (Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The doom and gloom rhetoric is getting old. No one is disputing Obama is intent on doing serious harm, but the martial law arguments are just silly.


77 posted on 04/25/2012 7:58:09 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Here in Missouri, Gingrich wasn’t on the ballot, but Santorum was. Santorum OVERWHELMINGLY beat Romney!

Had Gingrich dropped out back then, I have no doubts Santorum would have beaten Romney and become the Presidential nominee. But, noooo, Gingrich had to be the millstone around Santorum’s neck and hang around long enough to sink Santorum.

Oh well... Water under the bridge. It is what it is and it’s too late to change a thing.

All hail Breitbart’s challenge:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lbycMtTUDfE#t=734s

Cheers


78 posted on 04/25/2012 7:58:20 AM PDT by DoctorBulldog (Obama Sucks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
No one is disputing Obama is intent on doing serious harm, but the martial law arguments are just silly.

We heard all that same crap about Clinton too, back in the day...the GOP-E folks are getting real desperate.

79 posted on 04/25/2012 7:59:38 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It must be nice to live in the land of make believe.

Newt said he’d be in the race all the way to the Convention. Santorum tosses in the towel, and good old Newt follows suit in short order.

I guess I shouldn’t expect someone delusional enough to still be supporting Newt, to be smart enough to be able to see his treachery for what it was.

Couldn’t see he didn’t have a prayer, but supported him anyway. BTW, hows that brokered Convention thingie looking about now?

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha, bwa ha ha ha ha ha...


80 posted on 04/25/2012 8:00:21 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Okay, now lets see if the RNC, Rove, and Card can get him elected without their core base. Game on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson