Something I just realized. Didn’t the prosecutor admit yesterday that they have no evidence to support the claim that Zimmerman confronted Martin? If so, then they are specifically NOT using what was in the latter part of the Dee-Dee “interview” where it was claimed that Trayvon had apparently been pushed.
If that was really part of the interview with the girl, then why would they not use that, just like they used her claims about Trayvon being scared?
What I don’t understand is how the prosecutors - who are supposed to tell the WHOLE truth and disclose any evidence that refutes their claims - can get away with not saying that the 911 caller said it was Zimmerman calling for help, or a myriad of other pieces of evidence that strongly refute the claims in that probable cause affidavit.
This whole thing just really, REALLY stinks.
I know the MSM claims she has a story, but the point was the defense only gets to confront what they say in the trial not in the grand jury. Even if it’s in the grand jury testimony it can’t be brought up unless the person is called at the trial and then it’s tough for the defense to get it see: State v. Jose Alfaro: Obtaining Secret Grand Jury Testimony