Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts: Obama 51%, Romney 40%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | April 11, 2012

Posted on 04/11/2012 11:31:21 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued

President Obama continues to hold a double-digit lead in Massachusetts over Mitt Romney, governor of the state from 2003 to 2007.

A new Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters in Massachusetts finds Obama earning 51% support to Romney's 40%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; hahaha; ma2012; polls; romneysucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Clintonfatigued

Just for the record...In 2008 Mr. Obama won MA with 61.8% of the popular vote. McCain pulled down 36%.


41 posted on 04/11/2012 12:25:59 PM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama Can't Count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

-—This pretty much says it all... :-)-—

Funny and true. City motto: Get out before you’re hit by an illegal in an insurance scam.


42 posted on 04/11/2012 12:29:45 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
I thought the spread would be bigger, though.

Don't worry -- it will be! Obama and the MSM haven't started to campaign against Romney yet. I was hoping he'd jump the gun and start now, so that even the GOPe would see how hopeless a candidate Romney would be -- before the convention. But I just heard a soundbite from an Obama spokesman saying Obama won't mention Romney for months.

Romney really is Obama's dream of a Republican candidate, but I think he knows how unpopular Romney is with conservatives (with good reason) and wants to be sure Romney is the nominee before he wastes all that glorious ammunition!

43 posted on 04/11/2012 12:30:50 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
Why are you so convinced that Romney cannot win?

There are several months left before any poll is accurate.

Consider all the variables that will determine the race first, before you predict doom and gloom. By November, the economy will be in shambles, the debt even more so, Gas prices will be into the $5 range, a loaf of bread, a bag of chips and gallon if milk will cost 5 bucks and the millions more on Food Stamps and Welfare will drain the the taxpayers to panic proportions.

Add all the other International events that will likely come to a head by the end of this year, and you have Obama as the equivalent of Jimmy Carter on Steroid's.

This election is very winnable from our standpoint. Maybe if more CONservatives would get positive, pitch in and lend a hand to demonstrate those superior “Principles”, instead of only griping, threatening to stay home and vow to keep whining, we might not only win, we can actually get somewhat back on track.

44 posted on 04/11/2012 12:32:56 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Thats actually not that bad at this point considering Romney has not even really started to run.

You would figure slumbama would be at least 55-60% in MASS


45 posted on 04/11/2012 12:35:17 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT Hillbilly
...this election will have to be stolen,

Obamanites will do their best.

46 posted on 04/11/2012 12:47:47 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Geez - What are the demographics in MA?


47 posted on 04/11/2012 12:49:30 PM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
So the likely voters of Massachusetts put Zer0 ahead of their ex-Governor by almost 10 points? Very strange, unless a huge number of likely voters have no clue about ex-governors or what is going on in the Republican primaries.

In fact, Gov. Romney was perceived as too conservative in MA. See who he was replaced with?

48 posted on 04/11/2012 12:51:34 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

“I grew up in Newton, Mass.”

...I lived in West Newton (on Washington St) in the 80’s and worked on Copley Square. It was hopeless then. I’m sure it’s worse now.


49 posted on 04/11/2012 12:53:09 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This is closer than I thought MA would be.

McCain lost by 21 points in MA. If Obama is only ahead 11 points there, he's in serious trouble. Subtract 10 points from Obama's margin of victory in 2008 everywhere, and Romney wins. It's not a landslide, but it's nothing like the electoral vote squeakers of 2000 and 2004.

50 posted on 04/11/2012 12:55:26 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; stephenjohnbanker

All this proves is that a Communist country will always choose the proven Stalinesque candidate over a socialist.

The only decent thing that’s ever come out of Massachusetts is I-95 and our esteemed FRiend Stephen John Banker.


51 posted on 04/11/2012 12:57:24 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
The DemocRATS ran a governor from Mass. and LOST....they ran a senator from Mass. and LOST. What we do? he can't even carry his own state. No wonder the Republicans are know as the Stupid Party.
52 posted on 04/11/2012 12:57:54 PM PDT by Phineas1962 (Courage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This is closer than I thought MA would be.

Note that this is before the GOP starts hammering away at Obama instead of each other. Also, this is before the money parity the GOP should achieve this year, as opposed to McCain being outspent 3 to 1 due to his self-inflicted federal matching funds fiasco. It's also before hundreds of millions of GOP Super PAC money starts crapping on Obama from a great height in the form of saturation attack ads. The Rev Wright was off-limits in 2008. Now that Obama has promised to raise their taxes, a lot of middle of the road Democrat 1 percenters are going to contribute to Romney Super PAC's a chunk of what they might pay in taxes under a 2nd Obama term.

53 posted on 04/11/2012 1:02:06 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

This result caught a number of people off guard. I thought Obama’s lead there would be much bigger.


54 posted on 04/11/2012 1:03:23 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Over time, we have agreed on much, but now things have changed.

You might as well put me on your “whining” list, because I WILL NOT vote for that RINO bastard. I WILL NOT yield to MSM, Rove, Romney-Fox news, the corrupt GOP-e or anyone else that supports that POS liar.

I have long said that the very moment that Romney becomes the nominee, Obama wins another 4 years.

Vote your conscience, I most certainly will mine.

“Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again.” ~ Ronald Reagan, from his first inaugural speech as governor of California, January 5, 1967

Ronald Reagan’s warning about losing our freedoms echoes down through a generation of lost momentum and squandered opportunity.

We now have the most ignorant electorate in the history of American elections. I believe we have the most corrupt government and media our country has ever seen.

I believe that Newt was the one leader that could have turned our country away from the abyss, intelligently and quickly.

It is abundantly clear that not enough folks shared my beliefs, instead of a leader, they wanted a preacher.... and far too many lacked the courage to forgive and look beyond the personal sins in a mans past and into the promise of a brighter future for our country. That is certainly a free choice and a personal choice.... and as it is with all choices, there will be consequences.

To be clear, I WILL NOT vote for Romney. I have held that position from the start of this faux race and nothing has changed. To me, broccoli is broccoli, regardless of what’s put on it.... I hate broccoli.

In any case, Americans will get the country it apparently wants and a country it so richly deserves.


55 posted on 04/11/2012 1:10:55 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The left wins, either way.


56 posted on 04/11/2012 1:13:44 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I thought Obama’s lead there would be much bigger.

This is an interesting barometer reading of his diminishing attraction to liberals in general. Obamanomics is an equal opportunity menace, and liberalism is a luxury that becomes harder and harder to indulge in when one's wallet is shrinking.

57 posted on 04/11/2012 1:16:47 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

And the electorate shares in that corruption as well, given the “gimme-summa-dat-munny” mindset having replaced the “what’s-good-for-the-country” one.


58 posted on 04/11/2012 1:22:26 PM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
When was the last time Mass voted for a GOP POTUS?

1984?

59 posted on 04/11/2012 1:30:37 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This result caught a number of people off guard. I thought Obama’s lead there would be much bigger.

This is an abysmal result for Obama. A poll taken after GOP nominees have been stomping each other's guts out over the course of 9 months, and an 11 point margin is all Obama can muster up in a state he won by a 26 point margin over McCain? Subtract 15 points from all of Obama's state-by-state victory margins in 2008, and 2012 begins to look like a 332 to 206 GOP landslide victory - not as big as Obama's 2008 margin, but nothing that will require a recount anywhere in the country.

60 posted on 04/11/2012 1:30:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson