Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices poised to strike down entire healthcare law
latimes.com ^ | David G. Savage

Posted on 04/02/2012 11:47:27 AM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

Reporting from Washington— The Supreme Court's conservative justices said Wednesday they are prepared to strike down President Obama’s healthcare law entirely.

Picking up where they left off Tuesday, the conservatives said they thought a decision striking down the law's controversial individual mandate to purchase health insurance means the whole statute should fall with it.

The court’s conservatives sounded as though they had determined for themselves that the 2,700-page measure must be declared unconstitutional.

"One way or another, Congress will have to revisit it in toto," said Justice Antonin Scalia.

Agreeing, Justice Anthony Kennedy said it would be an "extreme proposition" to allow the various insurance regulations to stand after the mandate was struck down.

Meanwhile, the court's liberal justices argued for restraint. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the court should do a "salvage job," not undertake a “wrecking operation." But she looked to be out-voted.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said they shared the view of Scalia and Kennedy that the law should stand or fall in total. Along with Justice Clarence Thomas, they would have a majority to strike down the entire statute as unconstitutional.

An Obama administration lawyer, urging caution, said it would be "extraordinary" for the court to throw out the entire law. About 2.5 million young people under age 26 are on their parents' insurance now because of the new law. If it were struck down entirely, "2.5 million of them would be thrown off the insurance rolls," said Edwin Kneedler.

The administration indicated it was prepared to accept a ruling that some of the insurance reforms should fall if the mandate were struck down. For example, insurers would not be required to sell coverage to people with preexisting conditions.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: TexasRedeye

Let’s hope “Butch” Kagan squealed and it was bad news for the statists.


21 posted on 04/02/2012 12:41:28 PM PDT by tumblindice (our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye

Not it isn’t since it was enacted by criminal scum.


22 posted on 04/02/2012 12:41:48 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
An Obama administration lawyer, urging caution, said it would be "extraordinary" for the court to throw out the entire law. About 2.5 million young people under age 26 are on their parents' insurance now because of the new law. If it were struck down entirely, "2.5 million of them would be thrown off the insurance rolls," said Edwin Kneedler.

When my children turn 25, I expect them to be taking care of me, not the other way around.

A significant number of these "under 26 adults" are college student. Just about every, if not all colleges and unvirsities at the undergrad and grad level offer low cost health insurance that every student must purchase unless they can show coverage under another policy.

The big problem that I see is not with the striking of this provision, but what happens to the money that we have already paid in higher premimuims to implement Obamacare. We provide health insurance to all of our eligible empoloyees. Our premiums have gone up 30% to 40% a year since the enactment of Obamacare. If Obamacare is struck, are we gong to get any of the money back? Didn't think so.

23 posted on 04/02/2012 12:42:16 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The administration indicated it was prepared to accept a ruling that some of the insurance reforms should fall if the mandate were struck down.

I don't give a good Goddamn what the 'administration is prepared to accept'. If it's struck down, the Marxists in the People's House can just deal with it.

24 posted on 04/02/2012 12:44:13 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Myth Romney: "Governor Goodhair" is really just a Whig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
"Kids up to the age of 26 have been able to remain on their parents’ insurance plans for quite a while, long before anyone ever heard of this law."

I think that's if the kids are in college. This is no matter what. I've heard of "kids" that are actually married and still eligible to be on their parents medical plan up to 26. That's ridiculous.
25 posted on 04/02/2012 12:54:27 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
That 26 year old coverage provision could be passed all by itself.

That provision is just as unconstitutional as the mandate. These legislators and reporters and everyone else who's worring about losing the things they like if pieces or all of this obamanation is thrown out, never bother to ask if it was constitutional, despite whether they like it or not.
26 posted on 04/02/2012 12:56:38 PM PDT by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye

are these the same folks that applaud the “marriage is between one man and one woman” Proposition voted by a majority in California, be struck down by “unelected” individuals?


27 posted on 04/02/2012 12:57:45 PM PDT by nevermorelenore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
"As just reported on FOX, the Obama administration is saying it is a shame that a law can be overturned by “unelected” individuals!"

At least they are constitutional and have to be vetted by the Senate per the constitution. Unlike your Czars comrade Obama...
28 posted on 04/02/2012 12:58:02 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

>>Meanwhile, the court’s liberal justices argued for restraint.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *WIPES EYES* HAHAHAHAHAHA!


29 posted on 04/02/2012 1:00:13 PM PDT by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

This is just disgusting. 25-year-olds living in mom’s basement and having medical insurance through her. Say what you want about us Boomers, but we never sank that low.


30 posted on 04/02/2012 1:02:29 PM PDT by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

The article is from last Thursday.
Next time you have a link almost a week old let people know.


31 posted on 04/02/2012 1:28:12 PM PDT by slackerjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

I think that is a safe bet. If she did spill the beans to Obama’s people, is there any type of penalty? She already refused to recuse herself. I doubt the Conservatives will treat her kindly after this.


32 posted on 04/02/2012 1:33:51 PM PDT by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
"One way or another, Congress will have to revisit it in toto," said Justice Antonin Scalia.

You mean, Congress will have to read it next time?

33 posted on 04/02/2012 1:39:50 PM PDT by Nachoman (I HOPE we CHANGE presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

there are provisions that could stand alone. They should be INDIVIDUALLY debated and cleanly passed up or down.


34 posted on 04/02/2012 1:48:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Ditto :)


35 posted on 04/02/2012 2:29:10 PM PDT by luvie (Obama's foot soldiers are repulsive human debris and the voting public is sick to death of them! *RL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
"So, When the have nothing to report, they regurgitate old news?"

No, they INVENT it. The article states: "The Supreme Court's conservative justices said Wednesday they are prepared to strike down President Obama’s healthcare law entirely."

The "conservative justices" said no such thing. This is an invented quote to begin the Obama re-election offensive against the "conservative justices".

36 posted on 04/02/2012 6:18:36 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson