Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich: Walking dead out of Alabama, Mississippi
The Washington Times ^ | March 14, 2012 | Jim Picht

Posted on 03/14/2012 3:11:51 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

NATCHITOCHES, La., March 14, 2012—It was a good night for Rick Santorum. It was not a good night for Mitt Romney. Newt Gingrich is a zombie.

President Obama might want to celebrate tonight’s election results in the morning with a nice bowl of grits for breakfast.

Gingrich’s southern strategy is dead, and so is his campaign. The only southerner in the race, he’s said all along that the South would help him to the nomination. ... He came in a close second in both, results that would be respectable if he had more wins to his credit. But he doesn’t. There’s no way Gingrich can spin the night’s results into victory.

Nor can Romney, but his campaign remains very much alive. The mathematics of the delegate race didn’t demand that he win – if he and Santorum traded results, the effect would be a gain of only seven delegates for Romney – but a victory in either state would have been a definite boost. He won some delegates, and if he wins Hawaii and American Samoa, as is widely expected, his delegate lead will grow, but the losses still hurt, and they illustrate a serious weakness.

Romney could have won in Mississippi, and even Alabama wasn’t out of reach. He had sufficient support on paper to win, and the spread between him and Santorum was actually quite narrow. Between him and Gingrich the gap was even narrower, and second-place would have been just fine. But his supporters weren’t sufficiently supportive to actually go out and vote. He showed, if anyone needed showing, that his support is a mile wide and an inch deep. His supporters preferred to stay home and watch CSI, and so Romney came in third.

(Excerpt) Read more at communities.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; economy; gingrich; gopprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
To: Above My Pay Grade

If Newt drops out Romney can focus ALL of his time, effort and considerable MONEY in carpet-bombing Santorum into the stone-age. Santorum does not have the resources to survive a one-on-one fight with Romney. Newt staying in forces Romney to play a zone defense against both men and against social (Santorum) and economic (Gingrich) issues. If he bombs Newt, Rick surges. If he bombs Rick, Newt surges. If he bombs both, he comes in less than first.

Newt staying in the race forces Romney to fight until June and, even then, there’s a 47.8% chance he’ll not win the nomination outright (delegate math).

I’ll take the best odds we can get to stop Romney. Right now, an ongoing Newt campaign gives us the best odds.


101 posted on 03/14/2012 6:22:43 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

I’m an angry grandma who wants liberty and opportunity for ALL Americans, fighting so our example never fades!

Thank you for the nice comments.


102 posted on 03/14/2012 6:23:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Who gave you a crystal ball?

I predicted [in writing] in Feb 2008 that, if McCain got the nomination, he would lost the general by about as much as Bob Dole. Note that the McCain candidacy was nearly dead in the water at that point.

History repeats. The key is to learn from the repetition.
103 posted on 03/14/2012 6:23:23 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

What many Santorum supporters fail to understand is the Newt faithful do not feel Santorum is as strong a fiscal conservative as Newt. We know what Newt accomplished as Speaker of the House and we can’t relax with the massive earmark spending supported by Santorum. Also, I like the Galveston Plan (soc sec) as supported by Gingrich and RS doesnt believe in making any changes.
America is broke...Newt has a proven record in turning the economy around and fighting the dems aka Clinton.
MY hope is by staying in this race...Newt rattles the establishment and obtains some bartering power at the convention.


104 posted on 03/14/2012 6:24:52 AM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I am not surprised that Romney lost both Alabama and Mississippi.

I am fairly stunned that they chose the Yankee Catholic over a Son of the South.


105 posted on 03/14/2012 6:29:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Me too:) for love of my children and grandchildren and of an America I loved so much as a child when it was not a sin to be patriotic.
LOL I am from the black and white tv days when Ed Sullivan was the most risque show on tv, crime rates were so low we really could leave our windows open and doors unlocked and being a patriot was a good thing. What happened?


106 posted on 03/14/2012 6:30:09 AM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Besides that you are wrong in your analysis regarding Santorum why are so many people calling the candidates with their first names? Mitt, Rick, Newt… Are you folks trying to be cool and hip?


107 posted on 03/14/2012 6:31:14 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
What happened?

The Left moved into our universities, our newsrooms and our churches.

Time for a re-set. Our allies are begging us not to go over the same cliff many of them have or are about to. There still is time.

108 posted on 03/14/2012 6:33:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Go to: Newt.org

All of Newt’s plans are explained in detail ... and he has many of them.

Educate yourself.

And while you’re there ... hit “contribute” and do something to help America.

Have a blessed day.


109 posted on 03/14/2012 6:45:52 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I am fairly stunned that they chose the Yankee Catholic over a Son of the South.

That's the whole story in a nutshell. They denied one of their own.

110 posted on 03/14/2012 6:48:04 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
No, I want you to articulate Newt's position.
111 posted on 03/14/2012 6:49:00 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Interesting....guess we’ll know on Saturday.


112 posted on 03/14/2012 6:51:10 AM PDT by txmissy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Who gave you a crystal ball?

LOL, based on what I'm reading on FR during this Primary, I think there must have been a Blue-Plate special at Walmart on crystal balls.

It seems that everybody "just knows" what will happen if so-and-so doesn't do such-and-such.

Let the Primary battles rage, with all the candidates vying for the win. Let ALL the voters in ALL the states get their chance to make their choice, have the convention, and let's see what happens. That's the American way to do it.

Seems like I remember that some brave Texans refused to give up at the Alamo. They lost EVERYTHING they personally had to give, their lives. But though that battle was lost, the war was won, and the State of Texas came into existence.

Keep up the good fight, I'm with you to the end.

113 posted on 03/14/2012 6:52:35 AM PDT by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Less to type and no need for formality.


114 posted on 03/14/2012 6:57:20 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper
......Let the Primary battles rage, with all the candidates vying for the win. Let ALL the voters in ALL the states get their chance to make their choice, have the convention, and let's see what happens. That's the American way to do it.

Seems like I remember that some brave Texans refused to give up at the Alamo. They lost EVERYTHING they personally had to give, their lives. But though that battle was lost, the war was won, and the State of Texas came into existence.

Keep up the good fight, I'm with you to the end.

They they understood what they did mattered. They understood liberty.

115 posted on 03/14/2012 6:58:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“It’s is time to find a better ‘rule.’”
______________

Glad you pointed that out ...”Buckley’s Rule,” as practiced, has become a guaranteed formula for the incremental diminution of Conservatism. I think when William Buckley proposed it he assumed that Conservative candidates would always ascribe to a certain minimal list of Conservative principles as set forth in the Constitution.

The problem is that today we have candidates running who call themselves “conservatives” who are not at all conservative in the Buckley sense of the word and many voters who describe themselves as “strongly conservative” w/o any Constitutional basis for that description other than their own perception of social and/or religious tradition and values.


116 posted on 03/14/2012 6:59:02 AM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
"Good for you. Just can't understand why you'd choose a second rate candidate to fight for."

Santorum is not a "second rate candidate". He's the one who's beating your pick, consistently.

Read this again, and embrace it:

We need to follow Buckley's advice, and support the most conservative candidate who can win.

117 posted on 03/14/2012 7:15:10 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
"As long as Newt keeps fighting for Reagan’s conservative principles, like Sarah Palin does, I will continue to be with him."

"Principles" like amnesty for illegals? Bailouts? Some of Newt's current ideas sound good, but he's also always been a political opportunist. Take another long look at that lovely picture of Newt and Nancy on the couch together.

"Moderate Mitt is no Reagan-Palin conservative."

I certainly agree there.

"Neither is Santorum. He may mouth the words but his record proves otherwise."

I have to disagree.

Santorum's voting record strongly supports his conservative credentials. His lifetime ACU rating is only slightly behind Gingrich's, and it was above Gingrich's average his last year in office.

We need to unite around the only electable conservative candidate - that is Rick Santorum.


118 posted on 03/14/2012 7:21:52 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

I’m sorry, but with all I have seen and heard, I just do not believe Santorum can win. There’s a world of difference between him and Newt. Newt is on fire, talking about policy, his vision, with specifics......but just a few days ago, Santorum was still talking about JFK.

Now, that said, if Santorum somehow became the nominee, of course I would support him. Last night some Freepers said they wouldn’s support Romney OR Rick, which, to me, is ridiculous. Yes, I would get behind Santorum if necessary——but it would be with a very heavy heart.

As it stands, I’m still with Newt. I have no doubt he’s the man for the job. He stands head and shoulders above the rest.


119 posted on 03/14/2012 7:28:21 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I briefly had Fox on this morning. A promo for one of their shows came on, with a picture of Newt and “SOUTHERN SHUT-OUT!” underneath. But no, they’re not in the tank For Romney.....it’s absurd to suggest it. /s


120 posted on 03/14/2012 7:30:39 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
"...but the stakes have never been higher and rational minds must win out."

Rational minds are in short supply, unfortunately. If there were more of them, people would have heard what Newt is saying and he'd be running away with this.

121 posted on 03/14/2012 7:35:21 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
“Why are so many people calling the candidates with (sic) their first names? Mitt, Rick, Newt...?”
_____________

Speaking only for myself, those nicknames are pretty much “authorized brevity codes” for the candidates; the media uses them quite often. I use them interchangeably w/their last names when I post simply because it takes so much longer to type “Gingrich,” “Santorum” or “Romney.”

If you really want to follow protocol and add honorifics (Former Speaker of the House, Former Senator, Former Governor of Massachusetts) it would be more correct; however, it would also be much more stilted, awkward and cumbersome.

(N.B.: Obviously, I am not on a first name basis w/any of the candidates and would address them appropriately if I ever met any one of them.)

122 posted on 03/14/2012 7:38:20 AM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
"Newt is the man the establishment fears which makes me wonder..do they really want to make huge changes and turn this country around or do they want to just go along to get along?"

The latter. Recently some GOP-e hack was on Fox, saying that Newt wasn't viable because he would change Washington too much. He terrifies them.

123 posted on 03/14/2012 7:40:24 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
You are correct. Newt is worse than Romney on border control and not even close to Santorum. See my link below, item #4.


Seven reasons for Rick Santorum


  1. Who has won the most states without the benefit of their own money, last election's organization or a billionaire casino sugar daddy?
  2. Who is everybody's second choice when he isn't their first?
  3. Who can get both the Romney people and the Gingrich people, who hate each other, to vote for him?
  4. Who has the best record on immigration?
  5. Who has the best plan for repealing ObamaCare? And is the only GOP candidate who didn't help write or approve legislation which helped spawn this fiasco?
  6. Who has the best plan for expanding the American economy and strengthening American families?
  7. Who is the closest thing we have to the "generic Republican" which polls show consistently beating Obama and is most likely to make the election about Obama's sorry record rather than about himself?

124 posted on 03/14/2012 7:43:06 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect
"he’s not an old man and pot bellied to boot?... image is part of the game, sad but true... If he was interested in running for president, he should’ve lost 40 pounds two years ago... tell me I’m wrong. I’d vote for him if he were my grandpa, of course..."

Wow. That's AMAZINGLY shallow, to the point of sounding leftwing.

Let me guess----you're an "American Idol" fan, right?

125 posted on 03/14/2012 7:44:12 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

They’re seething that Newt would stand in the way of Mitt.

It’s something to watch.

Newt is calm and standing firm. Fox anchors and contributors are at a loss about how to alter the landscape. So Fox spins, lies, ridicules and will eventually move to a reporting blackout (but Newt won’t sit still for it).


126 posted on 03/14/2012 7:44:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

‘The “Buckley” admonition held sway when he said it but after years of following it we find ourselves with a stable filled with Big Government RINOs.

It’s is time to find a better “rule.” ‘

That’s great, I’m all ears. However, the Buckley rule is in fact unassailable, the only problem is with those determining the “who is electable” part.

With Newt, it’s not his conservatism that’s the problem. It’s the giant raft of negatives he brings along for the ride.


127 posted on 03/14/2012 7:48:04 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

He has their number, all right. They don’t know what to do with him.

Did you see him with Bret Baier last night? Baier was grinning ear to ear, trying his damndest to get Newt to compliment Romney and practically mocking him when he wouldn’t do it. It was unbelievable.


128 posted on 03/14/2012 7:50:58 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
# Who has the best record on immigration?

Really! ? You are still using Numbers USA as a source? Numbers USA is a green, zero population organization.

"Dr. Tanton founded local chapters of Planned Parenthood and the Sierra Club and became the national president of Zero Population Growth. Unable to interest colleagues in fighting immigration, he formed FAIR in 1979, pledging in his proposal to make it “centrist/liberal in political orientation.” The first director, Roger Conner, had made his mark as a liberal environmental advocate. . . . Source

129 posted on 03/14/2012 7:53:25 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Newt was born in PA and lived all over as a military family kid.

He was at Ft Bennning at 8 onwards.

I think being raised in Dixie from 8 years on qualifies well enough.

His mom and dad were teen parents...his mom quite young.

he has come a long way from that...his mom ...unlike so many today...did the right things


130 posted on 03/14/2012 7:56:51 AM PDT by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
Did you see him with Bret Baier last night? Baier was grinning ear to ear, trying his damndest to get Newt to compliment Romney and practically mocking him when he wouldn’t do it. It was unbelievable.

I sure did. Bret asked him about Mitt as a nominee. Newt only would say he'd be better than Obama. I bet they could of heard a pin drop on the Fox set.

131 posted on 03/14/2012 7:58:25 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Majority of Newt's voters vote on economics

I disagree, I think Romney gets the not so conservative fiscal folks...the Wash Times sorts

Newt gets about what Rick gets...Rick gets a bit more kick on vocal social issues

132 posted on 03/14/2012 7:59:00 AM PDT by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Numbers USA is credible on immigration issues, despite their green agenda. I do not agree with them on their stated goal to reduce overall immigration because I think said goal would be a natural result of having a reasonably sane immigration policy. But their data on other immigration issues is balanced and credible.

Newt, like Rick Perry, have a lot of great ideas on growing our economy, but sour a lot of conservatives because they put the interests of the open borders lobby ahead of the interests of ordinary Americans.

Too many business interests, including Perry, Gingrich and the Chamber of Commerce, are too blind to see that their unbridled affection for cheap labor leads to massive importation of third worlders who will enthusiastically vote for socialism as a means to get more free stuff.

That's a far more dangerous mindset than one of Rick Santorum's occasional pro-union votes while representing a heavily unionized constituency.

Think of it as the difference between some northern conservatives and southern conservatives, if you like. Some southerners may like the benefits that illegal aliens and cheap labor brings to their economies, but many of us northerners resent the costs which they overwhelmingly impose on us with job losses (albeit some contributed by excess unionism), loss of congressional seats, rising crime and an increased number of feeders at the government trough.

Based on the results in Alabama and Mississippi last night, I'd have to say that a lot of our brothers and sisters in the south agree with us.

P.S. Just because Noam Chomsky is an American hating moonbat when it comes to politics doesn't mean he isn't a brilliant linguist.

133 posted on 03/14/2012 8:12:17 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“The GOP-e, Romney and the MSM have been holding back on Santorum’s full vet. They need Newt out of their way to do it. Newt is the only thing standing between Rick and an incoming blitz of negative press. They know Newt is the stronger and they want Rick to be crowned the “anti-Mitt” before they cut him off at the knees and nominate Romney.”

CW, you were a big Rick Perry supporter, assuring all of us that Perry’s conservative credentials and wonderful attributes would eventually prevail and make him the frontrunner, and our next President.

Let’s just say I find your view of “reality” less than realistic. “Newt is the stronger”?!? LOL


134 posted on 03/14/2012 8:26:21 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Principled
I think he’s the best one to lead the fight.

I agree. He is our modern-day Benjamin Franklin -- the "wise man" who may not be the figurehead, but adds immeasurably to the determination of the issues and the possible solutions.

I learned in high school that it is always the popular or good-looking kids who get elected in popular voting. The student council president or the virgin girl who is already determined to find a cure for cancer get slammed into the lockers.

I wonder if our Founders' intent that only land-owners get to vote should still be the rule. This concept needs to be modified for today's society. It is disgusting that the dregs of society get to wield so much electoral power. Heaven help us if the Alinskreeps succeed in destroying the Electoral College.

135 posted on 03/14/2012 8:40:15 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The facts of life are Tory." -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Oh com’on, lighten up a bit... have a little fun... I’m there voting for the ol coot if he should get the nomination... “buuu, ‘e don’ seem do-b gudding da mushtart”


136 posted on 03/14/2012 8:41:22 AM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain; Jim Noble
So in other words you want Mitt to win. If Newt stays in that will happen and then Obama will win.

Avoid embarrassing yourself by learning the great difference between a primary election and the general election. Start with Jim Noble's post 10 (above).

137 posted on 03/14/2012 8:47:46 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The facts of life are Tory." -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The "Buckley" admonition held sway when he said it but after years of following it we find ourselves with a stable filled with Big Government RINOs.

Oh, please! We've had one Rockefeller-Republican-RINO after another! Please name one true conservative that the RNC-E has supported -- I'm eager to hear.

138 posted on 03/14/2012 8:53:55 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The facts of life are Tory." -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Is 175,000 out of 110,000,000 voters a large contributor base? I know most never give anything.


139 posted on 03/14/2012 9:07:10 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm afraid the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Well stated!


140 posted on 03/14/2012 9:09:09 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

You are so right. Its not a crime to stay in the race all the way to the end. I think conservatives (me included) just had a bellyful of getting drunk and voting for some mediocre candidate like McCain just to watch him lose. This year we just don’t want to cave in and do it again. I say let Newt stay in if he is willing to take the heat and lets take it to the convention and hash it out there. Every so many decades we need a good bloodletting to clear the air.

Besides, the only thing standing between Santorum and millions of dollars of negative Willard ads is Newt Gingrich.


141 posted on 03/14/2012 9:25:32 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Besides that you are wrong in your analysis regarding Santorum...

Your stating something does not make it true. Nice try tho.

... why are so many people calling the candidates with their first names? Mitt, Rick, Newt…

I don't know about others, but I do it b/c it's shorter yet obviously conveys the same meaning.

Are you folks trying to be cool and hip?

What are you talking about?

142 posted on 03/14/2012 9:36:30 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
>> I am fairly stunned that they chose the Yankee Catholic over a Son of the South. <<

The "Son of the South" (Gingrich) was born and raised in Pennsylvania and is also a practicing Catholic. The "Yankee Catholic" was born in Virginia and lives there today.

143 posted on 03/14/2012 9:44:04 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

I don’t care how you spin it ... if Rick Santorum gets the nod from the GOP ... it will be massive defeat. Rick Santorum is not ready for prime time and buyer’s remorse will own the day.

Santorum is not going to carry California, NY, Ohio, PA, Michigan and Florida in November, so good luck with that ole Electoral College thingy.

But keep dancing and celebrating your win.

We’ll be here for you when you sober up in December.

Have a blessed day.


144 posted on 03/14/2012 10:16:01 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why do you post this, CW? You’re for Newt.


145 posted on 03/14/2012 10:57:00 AM PDT by steve8714 (Thank you, Andrew. I miss you already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
The economy is positioned to crash ... with or without Obama in the White House.

The RNC-GOP-Establishment-RINOs or Whatever TF it is, does NOT WANT THE WH! They know it's all going to crash. They want it to be Obama's Fault while they use Romney and the money to win the House and the Senate. The pros call this the "Down Ticket" strategy.

Their theory is foolish. They actually think they can tie up Obama in a sort of replay of the Clinton deal when they got Welfare Reform passed. Obama with his czars and with his contrrol of the executive branch will simply buy the RINOs and complete his plan to bring Socialism to America.

The GOP is passing up a chance to save the country. That's all.

146 posted on 03/14/2012 11:55:24 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: txmissy
Interesting....guess we’ll know on Saturday.


Indeed curious.

According to the 'Sinclair News' website, they say they are giving Santorum another 72 hours to respond and that their "source(s) have solid records" with the news site. If there is anything to this, PMSNBC will probably be the first main stream news organ to run with it. They also speculate that Gingrich may know of the "Campaign ending dirt on Santorum" and he is waiting for the bad news to break and why he is staying in the race.

I'll keep an eye on what these guys have if anything.

147 posted on 03/14/2012 12:39:08 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: txmissy; Red Steel

BookMark for Saturday

May God guide our course.
Tatt


148 posted on 03/14/2012 12:55:10 PM PDT by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
Why do you post this, CW? You’re for Newt.

Did you read my first comment?

149 posted on 03/14/2012 1:51:31 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

“I don’t care how you spin it ... if Rick Santorum gets the nod from the GOP ... it will be massive defeat. Rick Santorum is not ready for prime time and buyer’s remorse will own the day.”

You’re welcome to your opinion, however divorced from reality it may be.

0bamney would be the definition of “buyer’s remorse”. Newt, bless his heart, has no chance whatever in the general. Gingrich has almost all of the drawbacks of McCain, without the positives (war hero, faithful husband).

“Santorum is not going to carry California, NY, Ohio, PA, Michigan and Florida in November, so good luck with that ole Electoral College thingy.”

I can’t speak for anywhere else, but Rick already polls ahead of 0bama in Ohio. Things are likely to change quite a bit for the better before election day regardless.

“But keep dancing and celebrating your win.

We’ll be here for you when you sober up in December.”

Heh, we’ll see about all that. November is what matters, no?

“Have a blessed day.”

You as well.


150 posted on 03/14/2012 2:51:43 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson