Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Bomber Program 'Underway' But Cloaked in Secrecy
AolDefense ^ | 2/24/2012 | Colin Clark

Posted on 02/24/2012 9:09:08 PM PST by U-238

America's new long-range bomber program is "underway," will involve somewhere between 80 and 100 planes and will be delivered sometime in the mid-2020's. "And that's about all we're saying," Air Force Secretary Mike Donley told reporters. It's been known for some time that the bombers will not fly alone but will be part of a family of systems that may include UAVs and other systems.

The really interesting part of all this is the secrecy and why it's so dark. It would seem to indicate several things: that the U.S. does not want potential competitors such as China or Russia to know how advanced a system will be delivered or exactly what capabilities it will involve; that the Air Force is still putting the larger architecture together, deciding which capabilities will be available.

The bomber will almost certainly include an unmanned capability, but no one has made a formal decision yet, an Air Force source told me. Many of the important subsystems have not yet been chosen, this source said. Even presuming that the $4 billion for the bomber in the 2013 budget submission spread over five years is supplemented by a few billion more in the black budget that is not much money to build 80 to 100 planes that will cost at least $550 million each. Even if that is flyaway cost -- which excludes research and development costs -- building a bomber able to penetrate denied airspace and fly thousands of miles to do it without refueling has never been cheap.

(Excerpt) Read more at defense.aol.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aviation; defensespending; mannedbomber; miltech; nationalsecurity; stealth; stealthbomber; uav; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: U-238

“It would seem to indicate several things: that the U.S. does not want potential competitors such as China or Russia to know how advanced a system will be delivered or exactly what capabilities it will involve”

This is the insightful analysis that earns journalists their well-deserved high paying jobs.


81 posted on 02/25/2012 3:30:43 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barak; obama; All

Why would we need a new bomber, we hardly use the old ones.

Light ‘em up wimp!


82 posted on 02/25/2012 3:33:19 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“I loved the Phantom. Classic plane”

At a Marine Air Show when I was about 10 or 11 years old, a Marine pilot gave me my first lesson in aerodynamics by telling me “The Phantom is proof positive that if you put enough thrust behind it, you can make a brick fly”.


83 posted on 02/25/2012 3:34:29 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Excellent Point. By the time B-52s reach their targets nothing would be left of Russia and there would be not too many operational air bases funtioning in the United States.

Some decades ago I was having an argument with guy over whether the Soviet "Backfire" should be considered a viable strategic bomber against the US. His argument was that the bomber couldn't carry enough fuel for a round trip.

My response was that they wouldn't expect a base to return to. They would hit their target, head for some wilderness area, set the autopilot, and have the crew bail out. They could go camping for a while until a winner was announced. (Or have some local communist meet them and bring them to a safe house).

84 posted on 02/25/2012 3:56:55 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

You are right again.


85 posted on 02/25/2012 3:59:57 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625; Nowhere Man; Norm Lenhart; 6SJ7

People are forgetting these bomber crews will be exposed to high amounts of radiation by flying through the fallout. Unless, they weave around the clouds and waste precious fuel.There is also no guarantee that they will complete their missions when they are suffering acute radiation sickness.


86 posted on 02/25/2012 4:32:46 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: U-238

As long as the bomber crew is far enough away at detonation time that they escape the blast effects of the bomb they dropped, they will outrun the fallout as well.


87 posted on 02/25/2012 4:58:12 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Bomber crews will be entering fallout from Russian cities and bases from our strikes.Returning home they will encountering fallout from American cities.


88 posted on 02/25/2012 6:56:32 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

I would like to suggest to the surviving bomber crews and SSBNs to find a place in the southern hemisphere.


89 posted on 02/25/2012 7:00:24 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: STD; mkjessup

While Heinlein used it, Pournelle originated it. See my #61.

They were personal friends. Jerry very much looked up to Robert, and obviously Robert didn’t mind using some of Jerry’s genius.


90 posted on 02/25/2012 7:07:08 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Boy, that Marine pilot was spot on with that assessment of the Phantom, wasn’t he? Of course, those big honking, smoking J-79 engines were the epitome of power! From what I know of them (and being a former jet mechanic, I do know a little bit about them) they were apparently some damned rugged engines which could still function with compressor blades or turbine blades missing… and that is saying something!

When I lived in the Philippines when I was a kid, I used to go over to the officers beach that was near Cubi Point. Things were different back then, and as a kid I would go up and walk around all the airplanes that were tied down, and nobody would stop me. I remember seeing the Phantoms, the Crusaders, the Corsairs, even saw a few Sky Warriors and Spads.

As a kid, it was glorious. I used to build these models all the time, and to see them up close in real life, peering into the intakes and the exhausts was too good to be true for me. Oddly enough, they had a high-power test area further down the beach. They would tie down the planes with their exhaust pointing out towards the water and run them at full throttle! We used to go down there and try and throw things into the exhaust, or run through the area even though there were signs up saying not to do it. (It wasn’t all that dangerous because the airplanes were tied down at the top of a large rocky embankment, so wasn’t as if the exhaust would blow directly at you. It was pretty much going over your head…

I did the same thing there that I pretty much did down at the docks where the ships were tied up, and would ask all the sailors leaving the ship if they would take me aboard and show me around. If I asked 50 sailors, one of them will eventually do it, so I got to go all kinds of ships.

Up where they had the planes tied down, I would walk up to the pilots during their preflight walk around, and follow them around asking them questions. Once in a while, one of them would let me sit in the cockpit, which was completely the coolest thing since sliced bread!

One time, there was a pilot doing a preflight walk around on a Crusader. Right before he climbed in the cockpit, he told me I had to leave, then said “Watch what I do when I take off…” while he grinned and climbed up into the plane.

I watched as he taxied out and took off. No sooner than his wheels left the ground, he retracted them, pulled back on the stick and went up into the sky at about a 70° angle. As he gained altitude, the aircraft began to roll continually, and went up and up, rolling wildly until he disappeared into the high clouds. It blew me away, I thought “Hey… he did that for me!”

What was funny is I was up there a few days later and described to another pilot what he had done, and asked if he could do the same thing. I remember he looked at me shaking his head and said “No, he got into a bit of trouble for that…”.


91 posted on 02/25/2012 7:08:49 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson