Look. I don’t have the time right now to decipher your newbie libspeak that started in your anti-Santorum/anti-religious nonesense from post 56.
But I do find it amusing that you start quoting the Bible as you attack our Christian viewpoints.
IBTZ.
“But I do find it amusing that you start quoting the Bible as you attack our Christian viewpoints.”
I didn’t attack your “Christian viewpoints,” and you cannot demonstrate how I did. It becomes even more absurd when you realize that my guy, Newt, is also Catholic and has all the same pro-life sentiments and positions. This is the blindness of the typical Santorumbot that I keep seeing over and over again, and it is quite disturbing.
I'm not pro-Santorum, either. I'm pro-Newt, and that has little to do with his religion, except that it seems that he has changed. He is aware of the wrong decisions he has made in the past, and is trying to live in accordance with God's laws.
But I do find it amusing that you start quoting the Bible as you attack our Christian viewpoints.
IBTZ.
It's extremely unlikely he will be zotted.
His observations concerning a large number of Santorum supporters are right on IMHO. They attack other members of FR with BS accusations to impugn their character, inclusive of name calling, anytime they observe Santorum's weaknesses. I'm surprised Jim has put up with it for this long.