Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wash Post Journalist: 'Maybe the Founders Were Wrong' to Guarantee Free Exercise of Religion
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2012/02/08/wash-post-journalist-maybe-founders-were-wrong-guarantee-free-exerci ^

Posted on 02/08/2012 5:44:57 PM PST by chessplayer

Washington Post political writer Melinda Henneberger shockingly stated, Wednesday, that "maybe the Founders were wrong" to guarantee religious liberty. Henneberger appeared on Hardball to discuss the Obama administration's decision to force the Catholic Church to provide birth control in health care.

Discussing the battle between the left and those who see it as a threat to the First Amendment, she declared, " Maybe the Founders were wrong to guarantee free exercise of religion in the First Amendment but that is what they did and I don't think we have to choose here. " Henneberger's awkward comment came as she attempted to defend the Catholic Church. [See video below. MP3 audio here.]


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: chessplayer

If O. could do so, he would try to figure out a way to totally trash the First Amendment. He would do a Henry the 8th and try to setup a one-size-fits-all, state-run “Department of Religion.” ALL churches - Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, Holy Roller....whatever - would be required to register with the govt in order to be allowed to EXIST, to hold services, to preach, to teach, to set up their organizations, and to hire and fire personnel. All religious expression in the U.S would be micro-managed from Washington. Those who refused would be subjected to huge fines and/or imprisonment. It would be the ultimate power trip and he would love it. People who deny this possibility are living in la-la land.


21 posted on 02/08/2012 6:31:25 PM PST by Rosie405
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

When Madison submitted the Bill of Rights to the House he put freedom of the religion alone in his 3rd amendment. Freedom of press and the rest of the modern 1st were lumped in his 4th amendment. His 2nd amendment, regarding congressional pay took nearly 2 centuries to ratify and his 1st, regarding the size of the House, remains unratified but in play. So by the rankings from the Framers we get to shut down the Compost before they get to shut down religion.


22 posted on 02/08/2012 6:35:56 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I saw that segment on Hardball.

I came out with the sentiment that rare indeed is the Gin and Tonic that this woman has passed unscathed.


23 posted on 02/08/2012 6:38:16 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
some people think it was wrong to give women the vote too... wonder what she'd have to say about that?
24 posted on 02/08/2012 6:43:40 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I realize my reply is going to go hard against the grain of everyone reading it, but the time is going to come (too late) when Christians and Jews realize that the guarantee of “free exercise” of Islam to Muslims in the West became the vector that facilitated Islam’s ultimate triumph over The West…..

My opinion, mine only...


25 posted on 02/08/2012 6:47:37 PM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Washington Post political writer Melinda Henneberger shockingly stated, Wednesday, that "maybe the Founders were wrong" to guarantee religious liberty.

Well Melinda, maybe the Founders were wrong to guarantee a right to abortion...oh wait, they didn't.

5.56mm

26 posted on 02/08/2012 6:51:09 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Wow. They still have the ability to shock me.


27 posted on 02/08/2012 7:53:00 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

That is a seriously ironic thought coming in a thread where progressivism, eugenics, and Margret Sanger were mentioned.

Substitute “Blacks” for “Liberals” and you agree 100%.

I think you should reassess your opinion.


28 posted on 02/08/2012 8:01:44 PM PST by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Apparently she missed out on the history lessons of religious purges in Europe and elsewhere and does not bother to read the news today of Islamist massacres of the lowly kufir Jews, Christians, and Buddhists who do not accept Mohamhead as their godhead.

The Soviet Communists were right to fear religious believers. Brought down the Evil Empire in the end. HA HA! Atheist Socialists lose! Personal liberty wins.


29 posted on 02/08/2012 8:03:08 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Free Engineer

Liberalism is a mental disorder, but it isn’t a birth condition.

Red doper diaper babyhoods are child abuse.

Do you think neo-nazis should be encouraged to breed and indoctrinate their children in toxic ideology and hate?


30 posted on 02/08/2012 8:08:17 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Perhaps the Founders were also wrong about protecting Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press, as well...

...and to think that she gets paid for such twaddle...who did she sleep with to get that job, anyway?


31 posted on 02/08/2012 8:11:52 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun control means hitting where you're aiming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

argh...slow response on the “post” button...


32 posted on 02/08/2012 8:31:17 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun control means hitting where you're aiming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
No maybe about this, the Founders were wrong to not provide ways of expelling the likes of 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radicals (spoiled brats, actually) and their ideological issue.

No Rat Party (formerly the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party), no rats.

33 posted on 02/08/2012 8:44:42 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Sounds like that line was thrown in to placate her Pro-Kill friends, but still a fundamentally egregious suggestion.


34 posted on 02/08/2012 8:55:29 PM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Maybe the Founders were wrong about religious freedom.

Maybe pigs will fly, too.

And, arguably, not only can pigs learn to write, the Post will hire them.


35 posted on 02/08/2012 9:06:48 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

May she rot in hell.


36 posted on 02/08/2012 9:07:55 PM PST by Fledermaus (I can't fiddle so I'll just open a cold beer as I watch America burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“Liberals shouldn’t be allowed to breed.

Don’t know how much clearer I can be.”

That line of thought leads to really bad places.

However, one can remove the franchise of Liberals based on the clear and unambiguous reality that any acts/belief systems which encourage or advocate unconstitutional behavior
is seditious.

Let Liberals pay taxes, but do not let them vote.

PS Don’t let them hold office.


37 posted on 02/08/2012 9:11:30 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Then there was that little jerk Washington Post editorial writer Charles Lane on the Fox panel tonight, with his typical last minute parting shot - “we still have to look at the fact that the Catholic Church can’t tell the federal government how to spend its money” (hint, Charles, they can when the government is trying to spend the money to prohibit the free exercise of religion - read the First Amendment some time when you’re not running your mouth).......


38 posted on 02/08/2012 9:26:23 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Religious freedom was the reason the first settlers traveled across the dangerous Atlantic to build lives in the New World.WTH is wrong with the writer ignoring this?


39 posted on 02/08/2012 9:54:32 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Hey Melinda Henneberger, one of the major reasons folks made the harrowing trip to the “new land” was to seek religious freedom.
YOU DOPE.
Course you gots to be an ignorant as you work for the Washington post.


40 posted on 02/09/2012 4:44:27 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson