Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven
[snip]...Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.
Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.
The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
“The right of citizenship never descends in the legal sense, either by the common law or under the common naturalization acts. It is incident to birth in the country, or it is given personally by statute. The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle.”
To say that the "child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen" can have no other interpretation than the fact that, although both children are equally citizens, only the child of the citizen is a "natural born" one. Mr Wong was a citizen, but was not the child a of citizen. Therefore, he was not a natural born citizen. Per the majority opinion of Justice Gray, only those born in the US who were "the child of a citizen" are natural born.
Those poor bastards. They’ve got us right where we want them. We can fire in any direction now!
And with that I bid you a good night.
I’ve been busy..hunting a new job, since having been laid off 2010 Dec 31, and connecting or reconnecting with family via FaceBook. I’ve connected with a great niece who I hadn’t seen since she was about 2, she’s 18 now. Also met her sister who I’d never met at all. I converse with a niece, 12, who I’d seen when she was a few weeks old, and only very sporadically since she was about 2. She’s smart as a whip that one is.
I also keep in touch with my brother and his daughter and with the two other great nieces who lived with us for several years. Also connected with two of our three exchange students.
Plus lots of FReepers with their real names.
But I sort of got sick of the political stuff, Still sick, or even sicker of it now, but It’s important so I check in from time to time.
yeah... pearls to swine. Why bother to be civil and all that bullpucky right?
Pffft.
But it did exist before the Constitution even for our Nation, but each state had it's own rules/laws. The Constitution wasn't passed until about a decade later than the birth of the Nation, in 1776 with the Declaration of Independence. But the Constitution did give Congress the power to define a uniform rule for it.
It existed in various forms in other nations well before ours came into existence.
Of whom Obama is a case in point. All the good ones who can't become President are justified to keep us from having a President such as Obama who obviously does not have allegiance nor natural born love for our Country and may well be a communistic, big government plant.
He/she/it must ALWAYS have the last word... it’s why I never waste my time with him/her/it... :/
Any experience with battle tanks? The cav or armor?
Follow-Up Ping.
Was this answered with linkage? I didn’t see such in the direct replies, and I’m still behind on this thread. . .
Yeah, is there a ruling yet? I don’t know where to go to find out, since there’s a pretty much complete news black-out on it.
Peter Boyles Show
Thursday, February 02, 2012
February 2, 2012 6am
John Sampson Private Investigator is on the show to discuss the mysterious origins of President Barrack Obama”s Social Security Number and the legal battle to uncover the truth behind the Connecticut issued S.S.N.. Also Open lines, Peter takes calls on the tantalizing issues of the day.
Barry “No Show” Obama forfeited his right to appeal in Georgia...move along now.
Yes, sorry about that. It was for Kansas
“Barry “No Show” Obama forfeited his right to appeal in Georgia...move along now.”
No.
The decision in the Administrative Hearing is advisory. The decision by the GA SoS may be appealed. If Obama gets an adverse action and does not appeal, then it’s an admission he does not have a defense to the claim he is not qualified for the office.
An appeal to the GA SoS’s decision is de novo (fresh start, new case, prior submitted evidence and witness testimony is irrelevant) with the GA Superior Court.
Only the President and Vice President have those requirements!
There fixed... :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.