Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt World Responds to ABC Buzz
NRO ^ | 1/18/2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 01/18/2012 6:34:27 PM PST by advance_copy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Siena Dreaming

Checked your posting history. You hate Gingrich so any extenuating circumstances will not affect your opinion. We’re done.


121 posted on 01/19/2012 5:36:22 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

His first wife didn’t die and never had cancer.


122 posted on 01/19/2012 5:37:03 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

If we were talking about specific acts of libel, testimony would be limited to those specific acts of libel. This wouldn’t be a divorce trial, it would be a civil trial and it would be highly focused on specific statements that were false/unprovable and injurious.


123 posted on 01/19/2012 6:16:06 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Just saw on Fox News an interview with Newt where he said he is not going to comment on anything that is said in the interview. His daughters sent a letter to ABC saying that personal family business should not be public fodder. If anyone wants to question his daughters feel free but he isn’t going to comment on the interview. Smart move


124 posted on 01/19/2012 6:21:24 AM PST by estrogen (don't let the media pick our candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RC one

No it is not limited, not at all.


125 posted on 01/19/2012 6:31:01 AM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Nonsense. The serial cheater isn’t going to sue anyone.


126 posted on 01/19/2012 6:32:02 AM PST by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I "hate" Gingrich because I don't agree with some of his positions?

Oh, brother.

I will vote for him if he gets the nomination. But I think he's got faults. That's "hating"?

You got some weird definitions.

127 posted on 01/19/2012 7:13:10 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
So now we're debating which adulterer "knows better"?

Uh huh.

128 posted on 01/19/2012 7:16:02 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: narses
“You have facts or are you jist opining?”

Haters, as evidenced here, don't need facts. Their hate alone is their support, facts, judge, jury and hangman.

129 posted on 01/19/2012 8:01:19 AM PST by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
Newt did wrong. We have all done wrong.

What pisses me off is that this 'hit job' is being brought to you by the geniuses who gave us Bod Dole and John McCain. They are 'republicans' who dish up crap, the day prior to the primary election day to give you a small set of probably partial truths to 'guide' you to vote against Gingrich and for Romney. They think they can 'force' you to vote they way they want you to vote by appealing to the supposed carnality of a man, who professed his behavior was sinful, wrong, stupid, and was his own fault,....all the while they commit the greater sin of selling their vice of the serpents' subtilty of self-submitted enslavement by 'getting you to do it their way'......put your own instincts on the shelf for now...vote the way we want you to vote....for we are your masters....we call the shots.

Newt did wrong....ABC and the establishment republicans are doing a greater wrong.

130 posted on 01/19/2012 8:18:50 AM PST by Texas Songwriter (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Well, that, and “peace, love, dope” ruled the day for many—especially the ‘beatniks’ and hippies. We sacrificed 50,000+ people in Viet Nam and let Iranians take our Embassy staff without consequence. We disengaged from gold as a currency and yet, supported Israel in the 6-Day war. We gave up the Panama Canal to the Communist Chinese and stood in gas lines—twice. We abandonned our economy to foreign interests and abandonned the practice of praying to God everyday before school started. We made abortion legal.

Communism was only part of all this, as were the riots in the 60s, the assassinations—including of a President, the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and the Viet Nam war itself.

Then, there was the moon race and the walk on the moon.

That era was a truly wild ride. Very, very few came out unscathed. I am in that group, and I have the scars to prove it.


131 posted on 01/19/2012 8:29:20 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson