Skip to comments.
160 billion planets in the Milky Way?!
MSNBC ^
| January 11, 2012
| Alan Boyle
Posted on 01/11/2012 11:05:37 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: dfwgator
I can prove without a doubt that we haven't encountered a sentient alien race.
If we had, ACORN would be canvassing their neighborhoods signing them up to vote.
Course, its possible that they're conservatives and just want the government to leave them the hell alone.
41
posted on
01/11/2012 12:20:52 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: circlecity
They only know the planets are there the "wobble" effect in the star created by the planet's gravitation effect.
Kepler works by measuring the dimming of the star as a planet passes in front of it.
To: bolobaby
"Feeling small yet?"
Not really. Yes, it is an awesome thing to contemplate the vastness of the universe but remember this - that universe contemplates nothing.
To: spankalib
The billions of WORLDS spinning through the billions of galaxies were not made in vain either! Theyre inhabited.
That can't even be said for all the planets and moons in our solar system. Just because they aren't inhabited, doesn't mean they are a waste.
44
posted on
01/11/2012 12:24:24 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: cripplecreek
Course, its possible that they're conservatives and just want the government to leave them the hell alone.They were.
45
posted on
01/11/2012 12:24:45 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: presidio9
So maybe we CAN each have our own planet.
To: Strategerist
That would require that we be in the same plane as the orbit of the planet, would it not?
47
posted on
01/11/2012 12:28:05 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Strategerist
"Kepler works by measuring the dimming of the star as a planet passes in front of it."
But that provides no more (probably less) information about whether the planet could sustain life than measuring the wobble effect.
To: presidio9
160 billion planets in the Milky Way (and no intelligent life on any of them).
49
posted on
01/11/2012 12:38:31 PM PST
by
Hacklehead
(Winchester 52, because everyone needs a 22 rimfire that weighs 12 pounds.)
To: mamelukesabre
...maybe a telescope on the far side of the moon. A great idea.
It maybe a while since 0bama's people have not started astronaut training for their trip to one of the asteroids.
First the asteroids then the back side of the moon?
50
posted on
01/11/2012 12:38:45 PM PST
by
TYVets
(Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
To: TexasFreeper2009
That statement is a display of pure ignorance.
51
posted on
01/11/2012 12:39:05 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: trumandogz
"But, I imagine that one might need additional executive experience to take that big of a job." You're probably right. That must be why Snitt Romney wants to be President, to pad his resume.
52
posted on
01/11/2012 12:42:34 PM PST
by
Rashputin
(Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
To: dragnet2
That’s just way more than WOW!
53
posted on
01/11/2012 12:45:16 PM PST
by
caww
To: TexasFreeper2009
Scientologists too. They can divide the universe between theirselves!
(Waiting for the humourless to respond: “that was uncalled for”.)
To: presidio9
And 7 billion people on Earth and about half a dozen more in a tin can orbiting it.
To: Larry Lucido
The planet with thousands of beautiful sex starved Amazon women is mine!
To: cripplecreek
Personally, I hope the universe was created for us and doesn't have any intelligent life. Instead, God wants us to go forth, be fruitful, and multiply.
I don't think He meant for us to use the tools He gave us to venture out into space and to the Moon and then retreat to low earth orbit.
To: caww
Thanks. Considering the object was not even visible to the unaided eye, when I processed that image, I was blown away.
BTW, the tallest of those pillars in that image, is closer to 60 trillion miles high...
58
posted on
01/11/2012 12:56:52 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: af_vet_rr
Low earth orbit is good for one thing. (Actually the moon is even better)
Manufacturing for launches of large ships from orbit.
There is some great much faster propulsion technology out there but the problem is that it tends to be large and its still gotta be lifted to orbit.
59
posted on
01/11/2012 1:07:25 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: caww
One more bit of interest regarding that image..
Even more incredible than it's size....Recently evidence was discovered which indicates the Pillars were possibly destroyed by a nearby supernova explosion about 6,000 years ago, but that event or light from that object, will not reach Earth for another thousand years. It's being speculated what is left is a stellar nursery, where stars are being created/formed from the material left in the aftermath of that possible cataclysmic event.
60
posted on
01/11/2012 1:11:15 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson