Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

The Founders were not for weak government.

They were, however, for limited government.

Big difference, and the two can co-exist. Whatever the fed government is supposed to do (see enumerated powers), it should do well.

But the big difference is that there are only (literally) a FEW things that the federal government was supposed to do.

My may how confused we are today. Today, the fed government is supposed to do everything, but everything in a sloppy, piss poor, inefficient, corrupt way.

Precisely the opposite of what the Founders envisioned.


10 posted on 01/05/2012 9:00:00 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeDude

[ The Founders were not for weak government.

They were, however, for limited government. ]

They wanted something stronger than the “Articles of Confederation” so they took a small step towards that with the constitution and the setup of the separation of powers.

If Newty boy was right about the founders wanting Strong government they would have swung the pendulum to the other side rather than just taking a few steps toward the center from anarchy.


14 posted on 01/05/2012 9:06:03 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson