Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRENDING: Ron Paul: Santorum is 'very liberal'
CNN Politics ^ | January 2nd, 2012 | CNN Political Unit

Posted on 01/02/2012 1:14:10 PM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk

(CNN) - Ron Paul dinged rival Rick Santorum Monday for being a "very liberal" candidate, saying the former Pennsylvania senator and staunch social conservative voted for too much spending during his time in Congress.

Speaking to CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash before a campaign event with his son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, the White House hopeful said his rival had taken positions counter to true conservative ideas.

I mean, have you looked at his record? Go look at his record," Paul said.

He continued: "He spends too much money. He wasn't leading the charge to slash the budgets and vote against big government."

Rand Paul added that Santorum's vote history proved he wasn't a true conservative.

"He voted to double the size of the Department of Education," Rand Paul said. "He voted to expand Medicare and add free drugs for senior citizens and he has voted for foreign aid. Those are not conservative principles. Seventy-seven percent of the American people are opposed to foreign aid and Rick Santorum has voted for it every time it's come down."

Paul also spoke in some of the strongest terms to date about the potential of a third-party bid should he fail to secure the GOP nomination.

"I have no plans in doing that," Paul said. "Tomorrow is a big day. We'll see what happens but I have no intention of doing that, no plans and no desire."

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Kentucky; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: apaulogia; apaulogists; bizarroworld; iowa; israel; kentucky; larouchies; liberal; morethorazineplease; paulestinians; paultards; pennsylvania; ricksantorum; ronpaul; santorum; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Dr. Sivana

Yeah I don’t get too excited one way or the other about endorsements.


21 posted on 01/02/2012 1:32:05 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Santorum thinks he is some kind of a dictator who can bomb countries without a formal declaration of war just because he is President. Liberal? Maybe but he sure isn’t conservative. He must think Congress is some kind of a potted plant. If he wants to bomb Iran, the first thing he should do is go before Congress and ask for a formal declaration of war.


22 posted on 01/02/2012 1:32:33 PM PST by ex-snook ("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Mr Santorum may be the only choice left that I could vote for that wouldn’t make me feel like I needed a shower afterwards.
Like eveyone has said about their choice..noone is perfect so neither is Santorum.


23 posted on 01/02/2012 1:32:39 PM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
We have seen the articles all over, so exactly where is the slander Paulbot...
24 posted on 01/02/2012 1:33:00 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Has anyone been able to confirm the report that Paul converted to Islam?


25 posted on 01/02/2012 1:33:09 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Hah! On the BBC news radio breaks last night in the wee hours, Ben Smith was on yapping about Iowa and how Santorum would never win an election because he’s too conservative for the American people.


26 posted on 01/02/2012 1:33:16 PM PST by Southern Magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I kinda like Santorum and couldn’t understand why he wasn’t getting more attention

Santorum lost his home state by 18 points last time around. There is a heavy stink associated with any incumbent who loses in that kind of landslide defeat. I actually agree with Santorum on most issues and he is a solid conservative in my book, but he will never attract the kind of money needed to truly make him competitive. Few people are going to risk big money on a guy who lost his last re-election bid in such spectacular fashion. And yeah, I think you have a good point - Santorum is very plain and not flashy (I'd call it charismatic) enough for the media.

27 posted on 01/02/2012 1:33:29 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Paul is a leftist Jew hating mullah loving whack job...

To put it mildly, and more respectfully than he deserves!

Now we're beginning to see something which I had feared, and which makes me pretty sad. Mullah Paul is going to taint his son with his stench. I like Rand Paul, but have been keeping an eye on him to see how far the fruit falls from the tree.

28 posted on 01/02/2012 1:34:14 PM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much. We will much about that be committed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Mrs. Frogjerk. In that case, I'm a liberal.


29 posted on 01/02/2012 1:35:26 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Thanks for the info.


30 posted on 01/02/2012 1:35:45 PM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

31 posted on 01/02/2012 1:36:12 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Paul is a fraud when it comes to spending.
He loads bills up with tons of spending when he knows they will pass, votes against them as says “see I am for cutting spending”.
Why wont he go away.


32 posted on 01/02/2012 1:36:37 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Iran has orbited satellites and is building a nuke. They are crazy and want my family to convert or die or just die.

I don't have any desire to temper what I say about Paul or his idiot followers.

Just sayin’...

LOL...

33 posted on 01/02/2012 1:39:36 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"LOL kinda funny from the clown who happily declares that the surge is all a media creation on this thread."

Bozo wants to know how your like your crow served? I am buying you lunch on Wednesday. We shall see how those 300 people surveys with an 8.5% margin of error pan out for Rick

34 posted on 01/02/2012 1:41:17 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk
To this day, I still don’t understand that move.

As I recall, it was a "scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" scenario. Specter was on the Judiciary Committee at the time that Alito and Roberts were nominated. Bush called in a favor to Santorum, and asked him to support Snarlin' Arlen, who would then see to it that Alito and Roberts were approved by the Senate. Santorum was a good Republican and did his Party Leadership's bidding. This act angered Santorum's conservative base and he was thrown under the Republican bus.

If you ask me, I think Santorum was put into a politically self-defeating situation by the Republican Party, but that's just MHO...

35 posted on 01/02/2012 1:41:31 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

>>>Yeah, Arlen Spector wasn’t liberal either who’s biggest cheerleader was Ricky.

It was out of political pragmatism. Having Spector in the Senate, and on the Judiciary committee gave us Alito & Roberts on the SCOTUS.


36 posted on 01/02/2012 1:41:35 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (No Mit Sherlock. No Mit, not now, not ever. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roninf5-1

It is probably being exaggerated, but I’m going to research it to be sure. You can spin anything to sound awful.

While I don’t agree with it if he did indeed vote this way, none of the candidates can say that they have a perfect voting record when it comes to conservative issues. None of them!


37 posted on 01/02/2012 1:42:27 PM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
"If Paul says you are not conservative then that means you must be pretty good by conservative standards since Paul is a leftist Jew hating mullah loving whack job..."

BINGO!!

38 posted on 01/02/2012 1:42:36 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

No kidding!


39 posted on 01/02/2012 1:43:24 PM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

I have some questions about Paul no one has answered. He has been very anti-Christian the last 10 years. He always takes the Muslim side and is always against Christians. In every case Muslims killed Christians, he thinks it was justified, but in any case Christians killed Muslims, they were never justified. When a Muslim shot people at a military base in Paul’s home state, Paul refused to condemn the person. I couldn’t find any record of support for Christians Paul has made in the last 10 years. If Paul were president, he would have to represent Christians, not just Muslims. He seems to be really anti-Christian.


40 posted on 01/02/2012 1:43:38 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson