Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy won't tolerate 'disruption' through Strait of Hormuz
CNN.com ^ | 12/28/11 | Barbara Starr

Posted on 12/28/2011 9:46:35 AM PST by ColdOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: Strategerist; All

Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes your don’t...

This is not going to be like some British surrender of a small patrol craft where the sailors are paraded like some prize won at the arcade...

We have had some interesting encounters with the knuckleheads in the past...It is well documented, and they are a risk to some extent...

The issue is if they start doing that kind of closing and dodging with our capital ships and other assets in the gulf, or other waters in the area, its going to be tht much more dangerous for them...

A good commander will not seek a confrontation (in this case), but they will be prepared to take care of the situation when it comes to clearly defending themselves on the spot...

We may have our doubts about the President and his track record on tactical military decisions...

But I, and many others, have the upmost confidence with the folks on the ground, sea and air over there right now...

I just wish I could sign back up for the fun...I miss it every day...


101 posted on 12/29/2011 4:24:00 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; All

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/12/29/us-aircraft-carrier-enters-zone-near-iranian-oil-route-as-tensions-rise/

OMG!!! How dare we do something like this!!! /sarc

We are just going to keep pushing and pushing Iran to close off these Straights of Hormuz if we keep provoking them!!! /SARCASM


102 posted on 12/29/2011 4:37:30 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver


103 posted on 12/29/2011 5:53:07 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It’s not the reverse bearings that I am concerned about, it’s the forward ones and the ones at nautical 90 degrees that worry me. : )


104 posted on 12/29/2011 5:58:46 AM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

What about a pipeline across Saudi Arabia? That way the Strait loses its strategic significance, and Iran along with it.


105 posted on 12/29/2011 6:31:12 AM PST by flbntz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/12/iran-says-it-has-video-us-aircraft-carrier


106 posted on 12/29/2011 10:17:52 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Thanks for link.


107 posted on 12/29/2011 10:23:07 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

OR WHAT?.............you ask?

Seriously, man...If the Iranians “disrupt etc.” someone might interrupt Barry on the golf course, and that will upset him.

Our Great Leader (OGL) will be forced to take steps....and charge CDR Frost for speaking out of line. Then OGL will bow towards Mecca and apologize to all Islam.


108 posted on 12/29/2011 3:58:03 PM PST by womanvet (The lesser of 2 evils is Romney. No man is justified in doing evil on the ground of expediency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bailee
Iran has worse thann the old Silkworms. They have ChiCom 802s and thier own indigenous copies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_equipment_manufactured_in_Iran#Naval_missiles


109 posted on 12/29/2011 7:02:02 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: flbntz

Post #103 explains how that doubles the problem if a nation at those two choke points decides to do the same thing...

That is if you meant putting the pipeline terminal somewhere along the Red Sea...

I believe they already have a few pipelines doing that now...


110 posted on 12/30/2011 8:02:45 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: flbntz

Post #103 explains how that doubles the problem if a nation at those two choke points decides to do the same thing...

That is if you meant putting the pipeline terminal somewhere along the Red Sea...

I believe they already have a few pipelines doing that now...


111 posted on 12/30/2011 8:04:44 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: LC Gladiator
Any increase in oil price will help vindicate Obama’s push for wind & solar. He can also say “I told you we cannot depend on oil - I was right all along”. So a disruption of oil shipping from the Gulf COULD help him get reelected.

This is all bogus, of course, but many, many ignorant voters will buy this crap. Obama's best asset is his ability to blame others (Bush), & IMO, if the Straits are blocked, it WILL be Bush's fault.

Fortunately, this wont trump long gas lines at $5/gal - 10 gallon limit. That will kill his reelection, for sure. So will a reluctance to reopen the Straits quickly & violently - you know how he likes to postpone difficult decisions.

112 posted on 12/30/2011 5:40:27 PM PST by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy
Since when does the Navy set US foreign policy? Where is the administration? the senate?

IDK, but I trust the Navy more than the administration OR the Senate. Or the House or State Department, for that matter.

113 posted on 12/31/2011 1:20:53 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

And the United States decided to join the Soviets in breaking the back of the Franco-British-Israel operation. Never have understood why Eisenhower made that decision, except that the allies left him out of the loop.


114 posted on 12/31/2011 2:57:07 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

And the United States decided to join the Soviets in breaking the back of the Franco-British-Israel operation. Never have understood why Eisenhower made that decision, except that the allies left him out of the loop.


115 posted on 12/31/2011 2:57:18 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

And the United States decided to join the Soviets in breaking the back of the Franco-British-Israel operation. Never have understood why Eisenhower made that decision, except that the allies left him out of the loop.


116 posted on 12/31/2011 2:57:33 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson