Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Tea Party Would Cut $9 Trillion
U.S. News and World Report ^ | November 17, 2011 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 11/17/2011 3:59:38 PM PST by Zakeet

Scoffing at Washington's troubled effort to cut just $1.2 trillion in federal debt over 10 years, the Tea Party's own debt commission today unveiled a shocking plan to slash nearly $10 trillion over the next decade, in part by eliminating several federal agencies, balancing the budget by 2015, and killing foreign aid to unfriendly nations.

[Snip]

Key initiatives include:

"Imagine a plan that cuts, caps, and balances federal spending without raising taxes; that gives future generations control over their own retirement security; and that lifts the massive debt burden from our children's shoulders so they can know the American dream of ever-higher freedom and prosperity. And on top of all that, imagine that it's a serious, credible, plan generated by the grassroots. This is that plan," said the report.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; cut9trillion; economy; spending; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Zakeet

This sounds surprisingly like Perry’s platform.


21 posted on 11/17/2011 4:22:31 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

From the summary:

“Make the Bush tax cuts and the alternative minimum tax permanent.”

Make the alternative minimum tax permanent? Do they maybe mean “make the alternative minimum tax *fix* permanent”? Does anyone know?

I hate that freaking ATM.


22 posted on 11/17/2011 4:23:09 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Day 48 Of The FReepathon
Do You Know Why?

There are loyal posters that donate every FReepathon. Some donate several times during every 'thon. But others never donate. Why?

1 My enemies haven't been zotted.
2 The owner doesn't support my candidate.
3 FR won't "upgrade" to "Like" buttons and blinky crap.
4 Someone else will donate.
5 My friend was zotted.
6 I lost my job and have no income.

Only one of those is a legitimate reason.

Support It Or Lose It


23 posted on 11/17/2011 4:23:32 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
It would balance the budget by 2015...and pay off the debt by 2020.

You figure out how to sell that to the American people, and watch this catch on like hot pants in the 60's, with similar smiles from me.

24 posted on 11/17/2011 4:24:50 PM PST by runninglips (Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics. ProgressiveRepublicansInConservativeCostume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

T.E.A.

DEFUND socialist collectives, foreign and domestic.

DEPOPULATE socialists and RINOS (Republicans Implementing Nuances Of Socialism) from all levels of government.

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71

Above all, if you wish to be strong, begin by rooting out every particle of socialism that may have crept into your legislation. This will be no light task. - Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850

Live free and prosper


25 posted on 11/17/2011 4:27:14 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
This reminds me of a young child's Christmas wish list.
26 posted on 11/17/2011 4:27:39 PM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

****Boo yah! Let the good times roll! I would love to see these cuts made.****

You mean let the hard times roll. Which is exactly what is inevitable and necessary for us to move past this. We wont transition easily, and it will mean much worse than hardship in the near future. After the bloodletting we will be stronger than ever.

This is also to say that the present course is outright suicide, so if we follow the course outlined in the article, well we’ve got that going for us.


27 posted on 11/17/2011 4:29:55 PM PST by ResponseAbility (Islam...Imperialism in a turban.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ResponseAbility

Party pooper! ;-)

Yes, I know you are correct, but I also believe that if we start going down the right road, things will turn around faster than people think possible.


28 posted on 11/17/2011 4:37:07 PM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Cut federal employee pay by 10 percent and slash employee travel to $4 billion, half of what was spent in 2000

Actually this will probably happen to DoD employees and military if this super committee fails.

But I'd like to add another item, since Congress got us into this mess, they need to suffer as well. Reduce their salaries, retirement & health benefits as well as other innumerable perks! They act so righteous like they have nothing to do with causing this crisis.

29 posted on 11/17/2011 4:40:52 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

“...Killing all congressional earmarks...”
I don’t know any practical way to do that.
-
“...Make the Bush tax cuts and the alternative minimum tax permanent...”
No tax can be permanent, since no congress can bind the next.
-
There is nothing the EPA does that can not be done better and cheaper by the states.


30 posted on 11/17/2011 4:42:44 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I like it, but if you eliminate the Department of Energy, who handles the manufacture, testing, and disposal of our nuclear weapons?


31 posted on 11/17/2011 4:55:46 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

>I like it, but if you eliminate the Department of Energy, who handles the manufacture, testing, and disposal of our nuclear weapons?

Department of Defense?


32 posted on 11/17/2011 5:01:08 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

(Tea Party)Key initiatives include:

•Repealing the president’s health care reform plan.
•Eliminating four cabinet agencies: Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce and Education, and reducing or privatizing the EPA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and TSA.
•Ending farm subsidies, foreign aid to unfriendly nations, and student loans, or what the Tea Party report called “luxuries we can no longer afford.”
•Suspending pension contributions and cost of living adjustments to lawmakers when the budget is running a deficit.
•Killing all congressional earmarks.
•Cut federal employee pay by 10 percent and slash employee travel to $4 billion, half of what was spent in 2000.
•Make the Bush tax cuts and the alternative minimum tax permanent.

This is the best plan I have ever heard and not one pub candidate has used these ideas as a platform. The country is gone to hell.


33 posted on 11/17/2011 5:03:24 PM PST by kindred ( Third party conservatism is on the rise, God bless the conservative tea party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Donate Today!

34 posted on 11/17/2011 5:03:51 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

[I like it, but if you eliminate the Department of Energy,]

A government agency having their dirty corrupt hands near nuclear weapons is a bad idea to begin with. The military should handle nuclear weapons start to finish.


35 posted on 11/17/2011 5:06:23 PM PST by kindred ( Third party conservatism is on the rise, God bless the conservative tea party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kindred
A government agency having their dirty corrupt hands near nuclear weapons is a bad idea to begin with. The military should handle nuclear weapons start to finish.

The same bureaucracy and support infrastructure that exists to handle those weapons under DOE would have to exist under the DOD.
36 posted on 11/17/2011 5:07:57 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

[So, in keeping with the spirit of trying to restore fiscal sanity, how about these additions:
•The United Nations

•All the rest of the Department of Agriculture

•All the rest of the Environmental Protection Agency

•The Transportation Screening Agency

•The Department of Transportation

•The Department of Health and Human Services ... transfer Medicare, Medicaid and welfare back to the states to do with as they see fit

•The Department of Homeland Security ... bust it up and kill about 2/3 of the spending

•90 percent or so of the Department of the Interior

•Everything else that isn’t expressly authorized by the U.S. Constitution]

Great ideas from conservative people. Why don’t we conservatives unite and actually run a conservative candidate for President or support a real conservative like Rick Santorium.


37 posted on 11/17/2011 5:09:47 PM PST by kindred ( Third party conservatism is on the rise, God bless the conservative tea party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Hmmm...how bout the guys that actually USE the nukes...might save some $$ there. When it comes to disposal we will just bury them in Harry Reid’s backyard


38 posted on 11/17/2011 5:11:55 PM PST by Nat Turner (I can see NOVEMBER 2012 from my house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The first Republican candidate who embraces this wins.

Until he is asked to name the four departments? :)

39 posted on 11/17/2011 5:18:16 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Add a roll back to 2005 budget and a ban on base-line budgeting, and you are there, I believe.


40 posted on 11/17/2011 5:19:37 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson