Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's The Matter With Oakland?
The Atlantic ^ | 11/3/11 | Megan McArdle

Posted on 11/04/2011 4:19:38 AM PDT by Haiku Guy

Cards on the table: y'all know that the Occupy protests and I don't agree politically. Nonetheless, I've been basically supportive of their right to protest, sympathetic to their frustrations with the system, and interested in their problems (and solutions) of self organization in a rather chaotic and fluid situation. Unless there were clear and dramatic harms to the community, I figured the cops should leave them alone until the protests dispersed naturally.

(snip)

At this point, the movement is hurting itself more than it's helping--at least, if you think their goal is to peacefully and democratically push for changes in the laws, a task for which they are going to require some support beyond the committed left. If you don't, of course . . . well, that has all sorts of implications.

If I suggest that the movement, and the left, needs to control this before the public really turns on OWS, I'll be accused of concern trolling. So I'll just say that despite our substantial disagreements, (and doubts about the effectiveness) I've been broadly supportive of the OWS project of organizing for change. However, if events continue to go in an Oakland direction, I'm going to become rather hostile to the movement. And I doubt that I'm the only one.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: anarchists; breakdownofcivility; butrapingisok; california; commies; doyouwantalist; ivorytowerpress; limoliberalmedia; lootingshops; oakland; occupyoakland; ows; ows2justrunwild; pansifiedmayors; paradesneedpermits; parasitesonparade; pervertsafezone; potisjustdandy; ralliesneedpermits; rapeisfine; sellingdrugs; smashingstorewindows; smokingistaboo; teapartypays4permits; throwingbricks; throwingglassbottles; throwingrocks; tossmolotovcocktails; trustfundhippies; waivers4ows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
MEGAN MCARDLE - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and the Economist has somehow managed to parlay an unerring ability to be always wrong about everything into a lucrative career that requires no manual labor.
1 posted on 11/04/2011 4:19:40 AM PDT by Haiku Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Click through to the article, to see how our keen observer of the scene, Megan McArdle, manages to discern microscopic differences in the level of violence and lawlessness at Tea Party and OWS rallies...


2 posted on 11/04/2011 4:21:18 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
One of McArdle's many errors is that she assumes that the violent protesters in Oakland are carbon-copies of the milquetoast just-wanna-get-high idiots protesting in Lower Manhattan. Oakland radicals have a long history of attempting to foment violent revolution. The Oakland protest was more confrontational and violent from the git-go.

Maybe if she wrote for The Pacific instead of The Atlantic, she would be more hip to the Oakland scene...

3 posted on 11/04/2011 4:27:47 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
As I said to the tea partiers who carried guns to protests: this sort of thing should stop. Not because you don't have a right to it, but because it frightens people. And large political protests should strive to avoid things that make others afraid for their physical safety, even if you know in your heart that you mean no harm. Whoever organized this should have known better.

One Protester. One damn protester parading around with his rifle, being shunned by all. We're still talking about this one moron a-year-and-a-half later.

Meanwhile, armed thugs burn down half of Oakland, and Megan McArdle strains to admit that they might be a teensy-weensy little bit more violent than the Tea Party protesters, who harmed absolutely nobody, and cleaned up the parks as they left.

4 posted on 11/04/2011 4:30:31 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
Can't you just hear that main-line upper class WASP accent?

"You icky little people are frightening me! Cease at once!! One can't take a peaceful stroll anymore without being mobbed or surrounded by filthy unwashed..."

5 posted on 11/04/2011 4:31:21 AM PDT by Ronin (If we were serious about using the death penalty as a deterrent, we would bring back public hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
I was watching the local News last Night.

They had about 50 protesters in Asheville, NC maybe after 10.

The police arrested them all.

They started saying how its costing the city, $ 5,000.00 so far.

Also most of the Police are being used to watch these protesters.

Then they did the interview of the person on the street and they are getting more upset by the day with the costs and usage of Police.

6 posted on 11/04/2011 4:34:52 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
I figured the cops should leave them alone until the protests dispersed naturally.

But they don't disperse 'naturally'. And these won't, unless it is due to the weather. The 'protesters' will force a confrontation and the 'protest' will end in violence. That is what they want, some point will be proved in their own minds that way, and they will get it.
7 posted on 11/04/2011 4:37:04 AM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
I don't want to minimize the things that have been done to protesters--I think the police should have exercised far more restraint, and if it's true that a man deliberately ran his car into jaywalking protesters yesterday, he deserves to be in jail. But that's not an excuse for rioting.

"Jaywalking protesters"?!?

An armed mob surrounding your car in the street, preventing you from moving, banging on the hood and doors and throwing paint on the windshield? Is that what we call "jaywalking" these days?

One of my pet peeves about the Dispicable Left is that they never miss an opportunity to accuse others of wrongdoing while simultaneously minimizing their own crimes.

Here a crowd swarms a car, harrasses the man and woman inside, throws paint on it and bangs on the the hood and windows, just because the couple happen to be driving a Mercedes down the wrong street at the wrong time. Then when the driver tries to move out of the way, some hippie stands in front of his bumper to block him, and gets nudged. Then the crowd pulls the driver and the woman out of the car to do God knows what, and they have to be rescued by riot police.

This is what is known as "jaywalking" in The Atlantic...

8 posted on 11/04/2011 4:42:20 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

basically supportive of their right to protest

They have a right to protest. Not to be dirtbags and trash the parks and not to be vandals and spray paint slogans on buildings and not to be criminal and rape and steal and sell drugs.
Their actions drown out their protest...............


9 posted on 11/04/2011 4:42:23 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
Watch for this more and more...the bottom is coming up and there will be calls for the TOP TO COME DOWN.

"I was okay with this until there was violence. Please, Government, do something...anything to make it stop".

Queue the theme from Jaws.

10 posted on 11/04/2011 4:43:42 AM PDT by IrishPennant (We don't want to work so we go to work to make enough money not to work...Huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

(As I said to the tea partiers who carried guns to protests: this sort of thing should stop. Not because you don’t have a right to it, but because it frightens people)

Why would it frighten people?
Have we gotten that far away from the folks that brought this Nation into being and fought and won 2 World Wars?
I have carried weapons for decades and I am around people regularly that carry weapons. I do not feel frightened. I feel safe!


11 posted on 11/04/2011 4:45:07 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

I wonder, if I pitched a tent and the sidewalk in front of Megan McArdle’s house, and started banging a drum at all times of the day and night, parading around naked and crapping on her begonias, if she would continue to be supportive of my right to protest.


12 posted on 11/04/2011 4:45:26 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

“What’s the matter with Oakland?”

MC Hammer.


13 posted on 11/04/2011 4:49:30 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

14 posted on 11/04/2011 4:49:56 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat1000
The 'protesters' will force a confrontation and the 'protest' will end in violence. That is what they want, some point will be proved in their own minds that way, and they will get it.

That is the obvious next step in this progression.

For the protest to move to the next level, somebody is going to have to die. Commies need their martyrs.

If they can't convince some weak-willed moron to flic his bic for the cause, and self-immolate, they will have to rely on the police to provide the dead body.

Expect the provocations to become more and more outrageous and violent, particularly in Oakland, until the police are forced to intervene with overwhelming force and somebody gets killed. They it's Katie Bar The Door...

Of course, the police know full well this is the game, so they are doing everything they can to keep it from getting to this point.

15 posted on 11/04/2011 4:51:57 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (We don't need to Occupy Wall Street... We need to Occupy K Street!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Even Laz has his limits.


16 posted on 11/04/2011 4:53:32 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
Shouldn't the title read;

"What Isn't The Matter With Oakland?"

17 posted on 11/04/2011 4:56:29 AM PDT by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Taze ‘em all...Bro.


18 posted on 11/04/2011 4:56:44 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
The mayor of Oakland, Jean Quan, is certainly complicit for having amplified this event, in my view, intentionally. First she tolerated the "Occupation." Then she supplied the necessary "police brutality" to magnify the grievances. Then she allowed City of Oakland employees time off work to enlarge the protest!

One wonders who is supplying her with the formula. More concerning is the motive and ultimate intent of her apparent handlers. We don't have a race riot yet, but it isn't unlikely they'll get around to tossing the ol' blacks v. Mexicans thing into the brew. 'La Raza, gotta toss in La Raza and we'll get LA into the act.' Then what? Turn it against the burbs? It's a bit late to light the hills on fire, but there's no place to run for those folks.

19 posted on 11/04/2011 4:57:23 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
They have a right to protest. Not to be dirtbags and trash the parks and not to be vandals and spray paint slogans on buildings and not to be criminal and rape and steal and sell drugs.

Notice how the police are always on the scene delivering a wood shampoo to Operation Rescue protestors who gather peacefully for a few hours then quietly disperse. The city is willing to break out the tear-gas and rubber bullets if a TEA party didn't get the proper permits, install the restroom facilities and pre-pay for police overtime and bond the well-defined and time-limited First Amendment guaranteed protest. For this group the city is practically sponsoring the mayhem. Why anyone with character or morals still lives in that wicked city is beyond me. Stockholm Syndrome most likely.

20 posted on 11/04/2011 4:58:17 AM PDT by The Theophilus (Obama's Key to win 2012: Ban Haloperidol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson