Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

APNewsBreak: Calif. rail project to cost $98B
Associated Press ^ | Oct. 31, 2011 | JULIET WILLIAMS

Posted on 10/31/2011 8:00:55 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- The new business plan for California's high-speed rail system shows the nation's most ambitious state rail project could cost nearly $100 billion in inflation-adjusted funding over a 20-year construction period but also would be profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public operating subsidies, according to a draft copy of the plan shared late Monday with The Associated Press.

The report estimates the actual cost at $98.5 billion if the route between San Francisco and Anaheim is completed in 2033.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; california; highspeedrail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2011 8:00:56 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I was only off by couple billion years ago when this albatross arose from the sea of debt looking for a new perch.

What a High-Speed Rail Job to HeLL.


2 posted on 10/31/2011 8:02:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This is going to make good the losses of all the Democrat politicians who had their campaign money ripped off by that mutant Kinde Durkee. Now all they have to do is go to the nearest BofA and get a loan against the kickbacks they’ll get from the unions and suppliers for this project.

Ain’t life grand?


3 posted on 10/31/2011 8:06:36 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
...the nation's most ambitious state rail project could cost nearly $100 billion in inflation-adjusted funding over a 20-year construction period but also would be profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public operating subsidies...

Does anybody really believe this?

Anybody? Save Willie Green, of course...

4 posted on 10/31/2011 8:07:20 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

” profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public operating subsidies,....”

You have to read that closely. No “operating subsidies” required, (so they say). However, there’s no mention of ever actually paying off the capital grant. If you gave me a free railway, I might be able to operate it “profitably”. Just don’t expect to get your $100 billion back ... ever.


5 posted on 10/31/2011 8:07:34 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think the real question is what do they consider profitable. I would bet that they are only including the day to day operating costs and the taxpayer is expected to suck up the $100 billion expenditure. I bet the cost ends up being closer to $200 billion and once it is up and running it turns into the slowest “high speed” train in the world.


6 posted on 10/31/2011 8:08:58 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

at least it goes inland.

it will destroy any local it touches.


7 posted on 10/31/2011 8:09:02 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Democrats flunk basic accounting. This project generates payola especially for the labor cartels. For the taxpayer, this project is just another nail in the budget coffin. It is only profitable if the cost to build and operate the rail lines are not included.


8 posted on 10/31/2011 8:09:39 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The Federal Congress should pass a bill congratulating Kalifornia for their planning ability and guaranteeing Kali that the Fed will not take any profits from the hi speed train while also affirming that the Fed will not make any contributions to assist should the planning numbers prove to be full of Obama.


9 posted on 10/31/2011 8:10:06 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
...but also would be profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public operating subsidies

And there are actually people stupid enough to believe this!


10 posted on 10/31/2011 8:17:46 PM PDT by Iron Munro ('We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them.' -- Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

No, I do not believe because it is a lie.


11 posted on 10/31/2011 8:18:56 PM PDT by dominic flandry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

So, how are they going to get someone to build it for all the money they don’t have? Unlike the Federal Government, they can’t just print money. The chances of this actually happening is somewhere between zilch and a Bond measure nobody would vote for in the next election.

This is political gas passing and democrap wishthink at best.

Note for Democraps, you have raided the treasury, there are not going to be any more free gravy trains.


12 posted on 10/31/2011 8:21:18 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Ahh, I'm so glad this project is going forward. I've been waiting eagerly for years for it to start, ever since that stupid rail bond passed. I can not wait, sitting back with my popcorn, to see the upcoming fight when the teacher's unions realize that they're about to get suckerpunched nearly to the tune of 10 billion dollars to pay for this rail system.
13 posted on 10/31/2011 8:26:38 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

20 years to build!?!?!?!? They’re taking their sweet time


14 posted on 10/31/2011 8:26:53 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Its not a railroad...its a perpetual union employment machine...requiring DemoCrat politicians to operate....


15 posted on 10/31/2011 8:30:19 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.


16 posted on 10/31/2011 8:39:08 PM PDT by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

That cost is nothing compared to what the union workers that run it will cost in legacy expenses.


17 posted on 10/31/2011 8:41:14 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Remember the ‘Big Dig” in Boston? cost estimate was $2B, wound up costing about $17B and started falling down as soon as it was finished. Of course, this California job may be the the start of the Intercontinental Railroad Obama has been talking about.
18 posted on 10/31/2011 8:47:42 PM PDT by Old North State (Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Great sarcasm!


19 posted on 10/31/2011 8:50:43 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

If they say 98, it will come in at 198


20 posted on 10/31/2011 8:50:54 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson