There is a fundamental difference between a weapon that propels a piece of metal at high speed in a specific direction, and a weapon which is designed to inflict fatal burns across a thousand square miles. Surely you can agree on that point, yes?
And I do own a number of firearms, but that's irrelevant.
A generation of Americans who would not have been born had their fathers taken part in a land invasion of Japan would find you immoral.
And I do own a number of firearms, but that's irrelevant.
A handgun held by a homeowner protecting his family is no more moral then the handgun used by a rapist. It's a tool, just like a nuclear weapon.
Don't you have some whales to save?