Purpose of FR and why we can never support Mitt Romney

vanity | Oct 15, 2011 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Our purpose and goal on FR is to restore, defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity!!

The goal of the domestic enemy (the left), i.e., the statist liberals, Marxists and progressives is just the opposite.

The goal of the establishment RINO is to gain control of political power, but not to otherwise rock the boat. The boat continues taking on water and listing sharper to port every time the left takes over, but the unprincipled RINOs do absolutely nothing to right her when they get a chance. In fact, the RINOs actually tack on plenty of their own unconstitutional baggage when they're in power and so our ship of state today is in pretty bad shape.

RINO Romney is one of the worst. We can thank him for being the chief architect of ObamaCare, which if we cannot get overturned and repealed, will finally accomplish the left's major objective of shredding the final remnants of our tattered constitution and ending our God-given Liberty forever (they think).

The liberals believe our constitution is a flawed document written in a different time for different circumstances by rich old racist white men and no longer applies to today's circumstances. They're now even trying to promote the idea that the constitution was never intended to limit or restrict the powers of government.

Like hell! That was and is its primary intent! And we who have sworn an oath to defend it, will defend it--from all enemies, foreign and domestic!

And that's FR's purpose and reason for being.

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Here's Romney's record on some of our primary issues of concern compared to Obama's:

Issue:	Obama	Romney
Pro-Abortion	check	check
Gun-grabber	check	check
Gay rights	check	check
Gov forced healthcare	check	check
Tax payer funded abortion	check	check
Man-made global warming	check	check
Liberal judges	check	check
Liberal appointees	check	check
Ted Kennedy pal	check	check
Proven liar	check	check
Fraud	check	check
Liberal Progressive	check	check
Enemy of Reagan/Bush	check	check
Enemy of the tea party	check	check
Enemy of Liberty	check	check
Defender of the Constitution	no	no
Conservative	no	no
Works across the aisle	no	yes
Architect of ObamaCare	no	yes
Domestic Enemy	check	check
Useful idiot	check	check

All of the above plus much more is documented in the RomneyTruth files on FR. Click the RomneyTruthFile keyword at the top of the main page. Also watch the "New Romney Campaign Video" also linked at the top of the main page. Watch it all the way through. I even saw some clips I'd never seen before. Pretty damning stuff for anyone running for president as a Republican.

Let's face it folks, the elite establishment RINO corps hates the tea party, hates conservatives, are afraid and even ashamed to have us identify ourselves as Republicans, feel we are dangerous extremist, racist, bigoted bible thumping, gun-toting, flag-waving neanderthals. The tea party is the best thing to happen for America since 1776 and our tea party candidates are the best thing for the GOP since Ronald Reagan, but what do the elite establishment RINOs do? They declare us the enemy! They went after Sarah Palin and some of our other tea party candidates with bared fangs and talons. Karl Rove and company were and continue to be as nasty and shameless on the attack as the nastiest lying liberal. Sarah Palin was the most exciting new face in GOP politics in a century and would have been a landslide 57 state victory over the corrupt, lying Marxist/progressive Obama. But the good ol' boys, i.e., the elite establishment corrupt crony capitalist GOP bastards could have none of that. Instead, they've opted to go all in with a corrupt, lying statist/progressive of their own: Willard (the Rat) Romney.

Well, good luck getting the Rat elected without the committed grassroots, pro-life, pro-constitution conservatives or the majority of the tea party.

FR, for one, will not play that game. NO MORE RINOS!!

No Romney. NOT ON FR!! NOT ON MY WATCH!!

Should Romney be "the one," I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs. Romney is no 80 percenter. Not even close! He's the backstabbing enemy within.

God bless America!!

Long live the Republic!!

[APatientMan]

“And what 60% do you DISAGREE with Romney on?”

You might be in the wrong place.

[Grunthor]

The majority of the people that I have talked to here are with you. As am I.

[Tennessee Nana]

I’d rather have a guy I agree with 40% there than a guy I agree 4% on.
_________________________________________

So you would choose <40% Romney over 94<% Cain ???

[Dr. White]

Attacking someone based upon their sign-up date at Free Republic is a horrible approach to building any organization.

[reaganaut]

I will not vote for Obama however, as the romney-haters here will do. I just won’t do it.

- - - - -
I am one of those ‘Romney Haters’ and I won’t vote for Obama and I won’t stay home. I will however vote down ticket and for a 3rd party even if I have to write in a candidate.

ROMNEY IS NOT AN OPTION!!!! EVER!!

[unixfox]

HONKIES FOR HERMAN!

Kinda has a ring to it.

[mkjessup]

So you are a rude and crude individual as well as a racist

Say there n00b, with a name like 'DR WHITE', I wouldn't be slinging that racist-word around.

[wagglebee]

So you are a rude and crude individual as well as a racist.

Let me get this straight newbie, you are calling a long-time FReeper a "racist" for SUPPORTING a Black candidate for president?

[Dr. White]

For seeking a clear establishment of positions?

If that draws fire, then probably so.

[Tennessee Nana]

Im mean and I like it when I can make a RomneyBot cry...

LOL

[DesertRhino]

Amen. And i would add,,, who is the greater enemy, the one openly attacking you,, or the one who claims to be your friend, but works to help the enemy agenda?

The GOP must be reformed,,THIS TIME,,THIS ELECTION, or it must be abandoned.

[Dr. White]

For using racist terms.

[Marak]

It would bug me. How important was Bush when he ran with Reagan? I really don’t want a ticket that would elevate the election of Romney now or in the future.

[shield]

I have identified some Perry supporters who I think are Romney and Paul supporters. They end up on Cain threads attacking Cain. It isn't a one way street it works both ways. The important thing is to identify them. They are disrupting both Cain and Perry threads.

I am happy Jim Robinson has written this article. He doesn't want Romney supporters here infecting Cain or Perry threads.

[Marie]

I am still waiting for your two to begin naming Cain supporters who are closet Romney supporters.

I’m sure Jim would *love* to know their names. As a matter of fact, so would I.

Please.

Enlighten us.

[McGruff]

Should Romney be “the one,” I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs.

I'm glad you added that. The worst thing we can do is stay home on election day and throw away the House and the Senate. But if I see the name Palin anywheres on that ballot I'll be happy to check that box.

[Lazamataz]

And what 60% do you DISAGREE with Romney on?

Well, you hairy-eyeball n00b POS (GOD I hate freakin n00bs):

1. He likes MM Global Warming. I don't.
2. He believes in gay marriage. Not me.
3. He instituted Romneycare, the forerunner of ObamaCare. Bzzt.
4. He raised taxes prodigiously and called them fees. He lies AND acts like a liberal.
5. He helped Planned Parenthood RAISE MONEY and thusly demonstrated his view on abortion.
6. He placed more regulations and upped taxes on gun owners. No go Tokyo.

Need you more?

And in case your comment was more directed at the other fellow, please strip the snarkiness out of my message and then read it.

[Responsibility2nd]

Attacking someone based upon their sign-up date at Free Republic is a horrible approach to building any organization.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

Not really. We’ve been doing it for years. It works.

lolol

Now zot off Dr. Cracker.

[wagglebee]

Attacking someone based upon their sign-up date at Free Republic is a horrible approach to building any organization.

Hey newbie, FR is BY FAR the most important and influential conservative forum in the world.

FR brought down Dan Rather, we're way beyond the "building" stage.

What we DON'T need is a troll who accuses people of being a racist for supporting Black conservative.

[reaganaut]

If Romney is the pubbie nominee, we can kiss the GOP goodbye along with a conservative president for the next 20 years and this country cannot afford that.