Posted on 10/13/2011 7:23:34 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash
Page 19 - In a bathouse in New York City, Demetre Daskalakis, MD hopes to solve the mysteries of long-term resistance to HIV infection. In this unusual setting he established an HIV testing site in 2007.
(Excerpt) Read more at communications.med.nyu.edu ...
It is estimated that 25-33% of gay and bisexual men in NYC are HIV Positive.
Not only is this a horrible and preventable statistic, just think of the economic toll this takes on NYC.
So what? I’ve been told I’m supposed to embrace their behavior. Go at it, homosexuals!
Let’s see now . . . a very famous study showed the average life span of a male homosexual who has AIDS is 39 . . . the average life span of a male homosexual who doesn’t have AIDS is 41.
The average age of a smoker is 69-73.
69-41=28 years . . . Why aren’t we condemning homosexual activity as forcefully as we do with smoking? Huh? And all we see on TV is the promoting of homosexuality as normal . . . smokers as abnormal.
That sums it up perfectly. Well said, FRiend.
most homosexuals cannot help themselves and have to have sex at dog parks, public bathrooms etc.
This is yet another reason why they should not be serving, why they should not allowed to give blood.
Only a liberal idiot would not know that homosexuals carry much more diseases and run their lives by their sexual turn on’s i.e. homo rodeo, homo parades etc
You wrote:
“The article goes on to say that in these high risk places the HIV Positive rate is 3.5% - triple that of the general New York City population.” ...
“It is estimated that 25-33% of gay and bisexual men in NYC are HIV Positive.”
Your math has to be wrong, as those 2 statements don’t square logically, unless either:
(i) 9 out of 10 people in bathhouses are straight, or
(ii) HIV+ gays uniformly stay away from bathhouses.
I don’t think either of those are true.
Homosexuality is not natural, carries more diseases, has less than average life span.
Their whole disgusting agenda is based on what they like to have sex with.
Ping
ping
But the militant homosexual crowd will still tell you that gay sex is NOT the #1 perpetuator of the HIV/AIDS virus. Gimme a break!!
I found that very confusing as well.
“If I were to tell the press millions of Americans would be blown up by an Iranian nut job or that Democrats have stolen their entire life savings with bailouts and Obamacare, nobody panics because it is all part of the plan...
But, if I say a few homosexuals in New York are upset over their little wee wees, why, everyone just loses their minds!”
Sincerely,
A. Joker
It's not gay sex. It's promiscuous anal sex.
If straight men and women routinely engaged in hetero anal sex with multiple partners, dozens to hundreds per year, it is likely AIDS would have spread just as fast in the hetero population.
Most of the other activities gay men and women engage in are much less likely to spread the virus.
In fact, the CDC says there has still not been a confirmed case of female to female spread of the virus.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/wsw.htm
Link does not go to article. Do you have a good link?
Baloney. Men are properly banned from donating blood if they have engaged, even once, in "sex" with another man.
Given the exponentially unlikely event that homosexual behavior only happened once, that is not promiscuous. And yet, it bans the donation of blood - ever.
Experts even recommend that homosexual couples in long-term, "monogamous" relationships STILL wear "protection" to prevent possible infection.
Agreed.
I’m just quoting what was in the study. It is at the link - maybe you can find what the discrepancy is.
The link goes to the published research journal, the article is on page 16 I believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.