Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama deficit plan would re-examine military retirement
Stars and Stripes ^ | Sep 19, 2011 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 09/19/2011 7:53:52 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

Included in the president’s deficit reduction plan unveiled Monday are plans to re-examine the military retirement system, calling the current 20-year requirement “out of line with most other government or private retirement plans.”

The document calls for the creation of a commission similar to the controversial 2005 Base Realignment and Closure commission to look at broad reforms to the retirement system. In particular, it takes aim at the idea that troops must remain in the military for 20 years to receive any retirement benefits, giving “generous benefits to the relatively few members who stay.”

The move comes just weeks after officials from the Defense Business Board outlined similar plans to changing how military retirees are paid, abandoning the 20-year service target.

In that proposal, the board recommended a 401(k) style plan which would allow partial payout for troops who served as little as 10 years. Officials said the move was designed both to provide a more equitable distribution of retirement funds and save money long term.

But veterans groups blasted the proposal, in part because they believe changes would reduce the benefits for those currently on track to retire after 20 years or more.

The new White House plan notes that “any major military retirement reforms should include grandfathering provisions that ensure that the country does not break faith with military personnel now serving, including those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

No action was taken on the Defense Business Board plan, and the new White House idea must be adopted by Congress before work would begin. Under the rules laid out by President Barack Obama on Monday, both the White House and Congress would have to approve the commission’s final report without changes before it could become law.

The White House did not specify how much changes in the military retirement system could save long term.

Obama’s deficit reduction plan also included $1 trillion in savings from troop withdrawals in Iraq and Afghanistan, and another $580 billion in cuts and fees in mandatory benefit programs.

That included almost $7 billion raised through a new $200 annual fee for veterans enrolled in the Tricare for Life program (but no new charge for active-duty troops) and more than $20 billion in new co-payment fees in prescription drug coverage for military families and retirees.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Travis McGee

That may be true of everyone who’s getting social security, medicare, etc, etc... In danger of default? Print money until the money is worthless.


21 posted on 09/19/2011 9:43:30 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Probably about the same time that medicare and social security obligations swallow up the rest of the budget.


22 posted on 09/19/2011 9:49:11 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Just talking to my hero hubbie. Military retirees for some period of time are subject to recall in case of emergency. He reminded me that my Dad carried ‘hip pocket’ order to take command of Long Beach Naval Facility under such conditions. My husband is still potentially subject to recall. So ‘retirement’ may not be retirement as understood in the civilian world. That kind of changes the picture.


23 posted on 09/19/2011 9:50:17 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51

But don’t worry Peeloss’ retirement is safe along with her stff. Pee on you military retirees.


24 posted on 09/19/2011 11:44:02 PM PDT by Waco (Nominate Palin or forget 2012 you lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal
"what about eliminating free health care for the lazy and illegals, section 8 housing, free education, in state tuition rates for illegals.......THAT TOO!
25 posted on 09/20/2011 7:22:04 AM PDT by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293
13 billion a year for retirement benefits. Some 7% of personnel costs. Out of our 663 billion military budget, 13 is only 2%. Not a “huge chunk”.

Only 47% of officers and 15% of enlisted men serve 20 years and get this benefit.

It is not a major cost. We can pay our military retirement benefits, or buy about 40 F22 fighters. ;)

26 posted on 09/20/2011 7:38:42 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach

exactly! fewer troops will want to or be able to stay 20 with this new BS rule. also 20 is not automatic, “up or out” guarantees a real gauntlet to run to make it to retirement


27 posted on 09/20/2011 12:45:24 PM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
This scum sucking piece of crap, and all of his cronies should be ejected from the government payrolls before one cent of military benefits comes under scrutiny.

When it comes to reforming military retirement...we need to put the blame where the blame is due...and it doesn't START with the Obama administration.

It starts with the BUSH administration. Bush nominated Gates...and this crappy retirement plan that has been floated is HIS baby.

And to put the cherry on top...Mullen OK'd it...another Bush appointee. We are getting hammered from both sides on this deal.

28 posted on 09/20/2011 12:56:20 PM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson