Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh my: Generic Republican 47, Obama 39
Hot Air ^ | July 14, 2011 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 07/15/2011 12:31:15 AM PDT by RobinMasters

That last jobs report was awfully bad.

Gallup typically uses this question format when a president is seeking re-election but his likely opponent is unknown, as was the case in 1991-1992 and 2003-2004, when incumbents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, respectively, were seeking re-election.

The elder Bush held large leads over his generic Democratic opponent throughout 1991, but early 1992 preferences were more evenly divided and Bush eventually lost his re-election bid. The younger Bush also consistently maintained at least a small advantage over the Democrat throughout 2003, before winning re-election in a close contest in November 2004…

Both Bushes had higher job approval ratings in the year before their re-election contests than Obama does now, helping explain why Obama has fared less well on the generic ballot in the year prior to the election year. George H.W. Bush’s approval rating in July 1991 averaged 71%, while George W. Bush’s July 2003 average was 60%. Obama’s latest weekly average is 46%.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/15/2011 12:31:20 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

That says that Donald or Daffy Duck would beat Bork Obunga if the election were held now.


2 posted on 07/15/2011 12:37:18 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

UP 8% and growing!

Better eat your peas Jackwagon!

obama-peas2

3 posted on 07/15/2011 12:39:00 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
"George H.W. Bush’s approval rating in July 1991 averaged 71%, while George W. Bush’s July 2003 average was 60%. Obama’s latest weekly average is 46%."

Well, Poppy lost his re-election bid, while Dubya won his. Sort of a mixed result there, I'd say.

I have read recently, that no president has won re-election with an approval rating below 51%, which gives me much hope for a successful ouster of this POS next November.

4 posted on 07/15/2011 12:42:38 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

I do not believe Donald was a Republican. Daffy, yes. Donald, no.


5 posted on 07/15/2011 12:42:38 AM PDT by FredZarguna (If you believe that only eyewitness to murder constitutes proof, you are being unreasonably stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

And yet ... the RINOs in Congress raise their white flags ... pathetic.


6 posted on 07/15/2011 12:44:48 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Now if we can only find ‘Generic’ and convince him to run.


7 posted on 07/15/2011 12:48:57 AM PDT by FredZarguna (If you believe that only eyewitness to murder constitutes proof, you are being unreasonably stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Sorry, we live in Libtard Zombieland.

I'll believe this stuff on Election Night 2012 and not a moment before.

Republicans HOPE people are smart, while Democrats KNOW people are stupid. The Liberal Media enforces that theory.

Anybody but Obama 2012, please...

8 posted on 07/15/2011 12:49:10 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Would you rather live in Obamaville or Palintown?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
47 is 20.5% (not 8%) more than 39.
9 posted on 07/15/2011 12:55:50 AM PDT by lewislynn ( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Please explain


10 posted on 07/15/2011 1:05:19 AM PDT by askrenr (HOOAH! It's an Army thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

18 months to go.
the economy will continue to deteriorate

he is way worse than carter
carter lost 46 states
this guy will have trouble carrying hawaii.


11 posted on 07/15/2011 1:10:20 AM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Harry Reid also had ratings so low it was impossible for him to be re-elected. So in celebration the local party nominated the one politician in the state the voters wanted less.

One might hope a lesson was learned.


12 posted on 07/15/2011 1:36:15 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Hey, I’m a generic Republican....

How about a President Bullish people?


13 posted on 07/15/2011 1:40:55 AM PDT by Bullish (Recovery won't begin until Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
What choo talkin' bout Bullish?


14 posted on 07/15/2011 1:46:38 AM PDT by Bullish (Recovery won't begin until Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Meanwhile......

The Republi-Tards in Congress are quaking in their boots as Dear Leader threatens to withhold Grandma's SS check that they will get blamed if this Debt Ceiling issue goes South, and (I was gonna suggest not ONE has the stones to call him on it, but thanks to a BRAVE Joe Walsh) only one lone voice so far (albeit no one in the leadership to include the pusillanimous Mitch and Bone-Er who between them don't even have one "pair") to take the fight to the Community Agitator.

And it's not like they have not had enough face time from the media; they simply don't want to "rock the boat."

Now even the Weeper of the House is talking about how good the RINO McConnell's plan might look which means for all practical purpose, our side has surrendered and they have let the Won escape unscathed once again.

No wonder the "R's" are considered the "Stooooopid Party!"

15 posted on 07/15/2011 2:58:06 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

All we have to do is find Generic Republican. The actual choices don’t do that well yet.


16 posted on 07/15/2011 3:06:33 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

You got it. It is not that the GOP is good. By 12 a Kangaroo could beat him.


17 posted on 07/15/2011 3:49:43 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Socialism...Easier said than done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
funny, this. it has to be a generic republican, because if you name a real one, it's not a winner.

Gawd what a head-fake this is.

18 posted on 07/15/2011 3:51:01 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("America will cease to be great when America ceases to be good." -- Welcome to deToqueville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Sounds like good news.

But keep in mind that “generic” often comes out ahead of a known person. These numbers would probably change for those that are in the public eye (Palin, Bachmann, etc.).


19 posted on 07/15/2011 3:52:01 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: askrenr

“Please explain”

47/39 = 1.205, making 47% 20.5% larger than 39%.

It is 8 PERCENTAGE POINTS larger.

To use a different example, 15% is 50% larger than 10% even though there is only a 5 percentage point difference between the two numbers.

Likewise, 2% is 100% larger than 1% even though there’s only a 1 percentage point difference etc.

Many people get this confused.


20 posted on 07/15/2011 4:07:29 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

‘Generic’ would be better than the RINO garbage who have thrown their hats in to the ring so far.
Mitt, Tim Paw, Newt, Rudy, ?
Get real conservatives orgo fish.


21 posted on 07/15/2011 4:28:30 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
I posted about this last night... after the republicans sellout and surrender on the debt ceiling... he will soar back up into unbeatable territory. Doubt me? Check rasmussen. He already has gained 7 points and went from -19 to -12 as of yesterday.

LLS

22 posted on 07/15/2011 4:42:01 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

... but Obama is still running ahead of named candidates, indicating that many of the voters still prefer ‘other’ to the ones currently in the race.


23 posted on 07/15/2011 5:02:38 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Yes. Recall the 'lame duck' session of late 2010. He managed to get about half of what he wanted and came out 'the media hero' as a result.

The big issue will be the economy. With enough manipulation, the numbers can be made to appear 'improving' and that will give Obama a chance.

Clinton appeared to be wounded going into the 96 election and he was going to be a one-termer, too.

Things in politics can change in a hurry, and incumbency is still difficult to beat.
24 posted on 07/15/2011 5:14:21 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This poll made me feel great yesterday but because of the comming GOP surrender on the debt I don’t think that number will hold up.


25 posted on 07/15/2011 5:45:36 AM PDT by erod (Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

generic could be a,potato chip. and still win


26 posted on 07/15/2011 6:12:20 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

More proof ... Elmer Fudd can beat this guy.


27 posted on 07/15/2011 6:18:57 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

It is only difficult to defeat an enemy when your front line soldiers refuse to take up arms and fight. In a fight... we have a chance... we have no true leadership... not amongst elected leaders ... and it seems we have little chance for Victory.

LLS


28 posted on 07/15/2011 7:11:05 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: askrenr
Please explain
The difference between 47 and 39 is 8...It doesn't matter if it's percent, dollars or marbles.

8 is 20.5% of 39. If you want to increase your percent, dollars or marbles from 39 to 47 you will have to add 20.5% more to what you have.

8/39 = .205 or 20.5%.

To check it, use your calculator, add 39 + 20.5%

29 posted on 07/15/2011 7:55:25 AM PDT by lewislynn ( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson