Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY case underscores Wi-Fi privacy dangers (SWAT, you perv)
Associated Press ^ | April 24, 2011 | CAROLYN THOMPSON

Posted on 04/24/2011 9:10:24 AM PDT by decimon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-438 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2011 9:10:26 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

When they come for you ping.


2 posted on 04/24/2011 9:11:17 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Thugs in blue.


3 posted on 04/24/2011 9:13:21 AM PDT by kenavi ("Anything that can't stand up to ribbing isn't worth much to begin with." Eric Idle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Law enforcement officials say the case is a cautionary tale. Their advice: Password-protect your wireless router.

My advice to law enforcement: Make sure you know for sure who is to blame or else you may find yourself getting sued. BIG TIME!

4 posted on 04/24/2011 9:14:50 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

On the other hand, if you don’t password protect your router and the data in question is not on your computer, it’s a great way for a pedophile to cover his tracks if he has a special off-site “porn” computer.

If your router is not password protected, and they can find none of the documents in your possession, this is the perfect argument.

No, I’m not into pedophilia or porn but I do use a local businesses wi-fi for all my access and have for over a year. In my case it was about saving paying comcast $75 a month. Youtube’s are a bit slow, but it’s a small price to pay. It also means that if I ever DID do something illegal, they would have to do some triangulating, site tracing (e.g. these posts), etc. to find out who and where I am.

This is a bit like having a car that your friends all use and getting a red light ticket in the mail where the face is not clear. You’re off the hook.


5 posted on 04/24/2011 9:18:40 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
""I think it's convenient and polite to have an open Wi-Fi network," said Rebecca Jeschke, whose home signal is accessible to anyone within range."

Idiot. Gee, I wonder who she voted for.

6 posted on 04/24/2011 9:20:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Sue the hell out of them!


7 posted on 04/24/2011 9:20:25 AM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

>>My advice to law enforcement: Make sure you know for sure who is to blame or else you may find yourself getting sued. BIG TIME!<<

This.

I heard a year or so ago that there was a company offering really, REALLY cheap wi-fi routers, but the catch was that you could not protect access. If it were ever to become fairly common to have a world of unprotected routers, it would be tough for cops to do this without more evidence that the owner of the router is the perp.


8 posted on 04/24/2011 9:22:06 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

When Zer0 and H0lder come to shut down the Internet, how is a network supposed to work without a wireless backup system?


9 posted on 04/24/2011 9:25:00 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

AFAIK in Germany individuals are obliged to protect their Wi-Fi connection. Owners are fully responsible for traffic they have.


10 posted on 04/24/2011 9:25:05 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Well,
Someone was downloading /uploading
Pedophile material through that router
It would be wise to drill through the connection
to the target Mac address,
perhaps the Routers log would be of assistance.

But a SWAT Team?
Where was the expection of an armed resistance
necessitating the use of drawn arms on forced entry?

11 posted on 04/24/2011 9:25:46 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET; unixfox
"Sue the hell out of them!"

Sue them? For what?

If the government can establish that it's an IP assigned to you that is downloading child porn, then that EASILY established probable cause to search your home. There's absolutely no cause for action.

Imagine your car - a car that is not reported stolen - is found at the scene of a fatality accident with no driver around. The police are absolutely going to be able to go to ANY judge/magistrate for a search warrent of your premises, and that search warrant will be granted.

12 posted on 04/24/2011 9:26:35 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I used to admire and intensely respect the police.

These home invaders are criminals in blue.


13 posted on 04/24/2011 9:26:54 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

“If it were ever to become fairly common to have a world of unprotected routers, it would be tough for cops to do this “

Or it would be much more common for bad guys to use unsecured routers, and this “explosion” of cybercrime could be used by the police as a perfect reason for more “dynamic entries”.

Plus, like the Michigan State Police who find it useful to download smartphone files for later use, the police might find such laptop and desktop data useful for later use. My first thought is “hate crime” investigations.


14 posted on 04/24/2011 9:28:02 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
On the other hand, if you don’t password protect your router and the data in question is not on your computer, it’s a great way for a pedophile to cover his tracks if he has a special off-site “porn” computer.

On the third hand, if you do password protect, and someone gets past your password, you look real guilty.

Maybe kicking in doors is the wrong approach to all but crimes of imminent menace.

15 posted on 04/24/2011 9:29:12 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

All I’m sayin is you should make sure the evidence you have is solid. Open routers are common all over the place, including restaurants, bars, retail stores, you name it. It doesn’t mean that the owner of said router is doing the crime.


16 posted on 04/24/2011 9:30:48 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

I’ve only got one neighbor who might be close enough to use my wireless and that’s probably stretching the range a bit.


17 posted on 04/24/2011 9:32:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

If anything, open wifi (in a residential setting) is becoming less common. Open access used to be the factory default but now it requires extra steps.


18 posted on 04/24/2011 9:33:07 AM PDT by bornred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

They threw the guy down the stairs.


19 posted on 04/24/2011 9:33:41 AM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
"All I’m sayin is you should make sure the evidence you have is solid"

And, all I'm saying is that the evidence WAS solid.

"Open routers are common all over the place, including restaurants, bars, retail stores, you name it. It doesn’t mean that the owner of said router is doing the crime."

But it does mean that probable cause is established to search the owner's home and computer.

20 posted on 04/24/2011 9:33:51 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-438 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson