Single White Females looking for Mr. Moneybags

ATLAH Media Network ^ | Aug 5, 2010 | michael master

[bronkburnett]

The statistics about how more than 70% of single white women joined with 96% of Blacks, 80% of Jews, and almost all gays to elect Braack Hussein Obama are indisputable. While white married women and white men voted overwhelmingly for McCain, single white women, especially under 40 years old, voted more than 70% for Obama. And many of them convinced their parents to vote for Obama.

And why were single white women so different than white married women or than white men?

Well, family values are being destroyed by liberals. With it, they are destroying the security that comes with marriage. Deliberately. As they push more dependence on Government … and decrease the “independence” of each American that is discussed in our Declaration of Independence. So Democrats are presenting the government as the care taker of single women and their families as the replacement for husbands.

In the last election, Obama promised healthcare for everyone, redistribution of wealth, closing a perceived pay gap between women and men (which is actually nonexistent when pays are compared for the same jobs at the same experience and performance), and more welfare benefits for single parents.

So of course single women voted for Obama. They were bought. They want help at caring for themselves and their children. And so they embrace the socialism presented by Obama.

Add the fact that teachers in the USA are 80% women

[greatplains]

Ditto!

And I'm keeping my vote to counter a libtard!

[Niuhuru]

“associate the GOP with greedy,uncaring, chasing 18 year old hooter girls while watching NASCAR males.”

So basically men are not supposed to be men?

A lot of those bitter women made a lot of bad choices and with the exception of decent women left by sexist pigs, they didn’t think things through using their brains. A lot of them decided to hook up with nasty, abusive, macho men who abused and demeaned them and they didn’t walk away. Or they slept with scumbags and didn’t take a decent guy when they had the chance. Decent men (and women) are not supposed to wait around for the screw ups to get themselves together.

It’s not the job of decent people to pick up the pieces of the lives of the irresponsible.

[coop71]

I have 2 things to say about this “article” and some of the posters here clamoring for a repeal of the 19th Amendment:

1) 56% of women and 49% of men voted for Obama. That’s a mere 7% difference in total between the sexes. So what is the American male’s responsibility for getting Obama in office?

2) Repeal the 19th Amendment because you don’t like how some women vote. Go. To. Hell. Seriously. To even JOKE about taking away half the population’s right to vote is as offensive as suggesting that we repeal the 2nd Amendment for men because some men make bad choices with guns.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

If I could wave a magic wand today and prohibit US voting for all women, as well as everyone on welfare or any form of government assistance, in fact for everyone who does not pay federal income taxes, I would do it.

If someone circulated a Consitutional amendment to restrict voting to male property owners only, I would vote for it in a heartbeat.

I am very sorry that informed, moral, conservative Freeper women get snared in that net, but the sad reality is that a lot of our runaway socilialism is directly related to the votes of women and those who are supported by the government, a huge overlap existing between the two groups.

[archivist007]

Females screw themselves up in relationships. They do stupid things like no show respect to the guy. They do not return phone calls. They do not initiate any contact. This shows that they have little interest.

They expect the guy to pay for everything.

They play around and are never serious about getting into relationships.

It is all about me with females.

[ak267]

Does Scrooge McDuck count? He’s kind of white....

[coop71]

“If someone circulated a Consitutional amendment to restrict voting to male property owners only, I would vote for it in a heartbeat.”

Would you really? Or would you eventually have to dust off that magic wand of yours... (now relegated to deciding who wins American Idol and the Super Bowl since women and other leeches can’t vote in elections) and wave it once again when your guys lose the election and you’re ticked off about it?

We had a lot of crappy Presidents prior to the ladies and the leeches voting, you know.

“but the sad reality is that a lot of our runaway socilialism is directly related to the votes of women and those who are supported by the government, a huge overlap existing between the two groups.”

If you think you can wipe out welfare (I won’t go so far as to call it socialism like you) in all its forms by eliminating various populations of voters, you are truly more clueless than the voters who offend you. As I said before, 49% of MALES voted for Obama. Many people I know through my son’s preschool, neighbors, family, etc., are male property owners who supported Obama.

[A.Hun]

The reason for the election of Obama in 2008 was lack of turnout for Republicans, especially older white males.

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/election-2008-census/2009/07/20/id/331722

[bronkburnett]

Thank you for your comments. But you make big mistakes.

while 49% of men voted for Obama, only 30% of white men voted for Obama. and only 40% of married white women voted for Obama. So why is it that 70% of single white women voted for Obama? Why are they so different from married white women and from white men?

[handmade]

voted for him because he’s so handsome....

Okay- bring out the barf bag. And get some help for that woman.

[coop71]

So single white women are leeches. They all want abortions, free money from the government, and a sugar daddy. Right? Is that what you’re wanting justification on? I don’t understand it: on the one hand, I read here daily that single women are allegedly taking over the world, becoming way more powerful than men, making more money (ergo not eligible for any sort of welfare), more decisions...on the other hand, according to the article, they are leeches of the government and avoiding marriage so they can use the government as their surrogate “husband”, grabbing welfare checks and any handout offered. So which is it?

Single women couldn’t POSSIBLY have voted for Obama because he didn’t come across as a crotchety old geezer, completely out of touch with everything. Right? Nope. They wanted Obama to raise their kids and pay their bills. /s

When I was single, my friends (many single females) were really annoyed that I voted for Bush, twice, and with great consideration. They voted for Gore and Kerry (and then Obama) NOT because they wanted welfare, but because there is a strong perception among single women that Republicans are essentially the type of “husbands” they don’t want: controlling, bossy, rigid, judgmental. We know that’s not true, we see the irony of that failed logic.

I have a theory that every group has to have an enemy in order to strengthen the bond of the group. Right or wrong. At school. At work. Socially. Conservatives have liberals. We hate liberals and bashing them is a form of bonding. Being opposed to every single ideology they hold, again, right or wrong, is part of the bonding. Single women, college professors, Jews (I have several of all of the above in my family) in many cases, have the same type of bonding. Hate Conservatives, right or wrong, leave the ideas unexamined, because they came from Conservatives.

So, in my case, my friends voted for the Dem, among many reasons, because that’s what you do when you’re in that group. Many here voted for various craptastic Conservatives, because that’s what you do.

One more example. My younger sister’s best friend. She’s single. Early 30’s. A teacher in a dirt-poor, predominately black school district. She is FURIOUS with how the welfare mentality has butchered her students lives. To say she hates welfare and the welfare mentality is being kind...and yet she voted for Obama. Because “McCain came across as a crotchety old geezer completely out of touch with everything”.

Maybe that’s all it boils down to with many single women.

[ravingnutter]

Like women never do that to men.

Whoa there...where in my post did I say they didn't? For that matter, where did I say all men did this?

I spoke about my particular situation, how it could have the effect of making a woman bitter at men in general, but in the very first sentence, put the blame squarely on my ex-husband where it belongs. I also added that a true conservative man would not do something like that, so I am still giving men...at least conservative men...the benefit of the doubt.

However, given what he did to me...and I didn't add that he left the day after I came home from the hospital from hip replacement surgery and had actually called his girlfriend 3 times while I was in surgery...it is completely rational for me to be more cautious about who I trust with my heart from now on.

[bronkburnett]

It is obvious that you have given this much thought.

So if your husband says to you that he needs some space, that things are too “confining,” what is your reaction?

Don't you really think to yourself that something else is going on here?

So it these “friends” say that they voted for Obama because the other choice was old and crotchety, then don't you think to yourself that something else might really be driving them?

Here is my bet with you: if you can go for 24 hours without saying the word “I,” then you will receive $100 from me. If you say the word “I” in that 24 hours, then you send $1 to me. 100 to 1. What do you say?

Do you understand my point that people say one thing to justify their actions while they hide the real reasons?

So let me ask you: why did white single women vote so differently than how white married women voted? especially white single women with children? at all age groups and at all professions?

[longtermmemmory]

Single men without children have a constant mantra of “don’t marry a woman with a child” No man wants to raise some other man’s mistake.

Of course this assumes women in question have children.

Perhaps childless women are just “marrying” obama in the way a cult leader marries followers.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Yes I really would.

And as I said before, if you relegated the vote to only propoerty owners, then you would eliminate all the MEN on assistance that rely on the government tit to support them and the remainder of the men would overwhelmingly NOT vote for Socialist presidential candidates. I have a close friend who makes good money, owns a home and donated to Obama’s campaign. He is still in the minority of men. Your similar anecdote doesn’t make them a majority of men.

My point is very simple - restrict voting to those who produce because the takers have no right to vote to receive more from they who produce.

I comnpletely understand your reaction to my post, as I would also be upset if someone was calling out my entire group and saying it is a big part of the problem. But I told you exactly what I would do and I meant it.

I would also be quite happy to see women keep the vote, but restrict voting rights to only property owners, or at worst, only those who pay federal income taxes. That would be just fine with me.

But there is no denying that since women have gotten the vote, we have been racing toward socialism. Many more women than men are on welfare and assistance, many of them single mothers. Women tend to vote in greater proportions than men. Add those together, and you get a much higher portion of female voters voting to surrender freedom to insure their security. That has been a fact over the past decades. I didn’t just make that up. It is an obvious fact to anyone who wants to do the research.

Men are FAR less likely to vote for a candidate based on his looks alone, but women do this all the time — completely ignoring the issues and voting just because the man looks good or looks presidential.

I don’t give a damn how we reform voting as long as we restrict voting to those who produce and prohibit from voting, those on the dole who are not producing. That is my entire point.

So I stand with my initial statement. I think US voting should be restricted to male property owners only, or at most, males who pay federal taxes. If that was not possible, then I could easily live with all property owners, or at most, all US citizens who pay federal property taxes.

[coop71]

Maybe something else is going on. Who knows? My intent wasn’t actually to defend single women - kids or not - yet I ended up doing just that. That said, who has more contact with single women as friends - who can figure out if there is an ulterior motive - you or me? My personal friends did what they did and voted how they voted and I believe them. Didn’t like how they voted at all, but can’t change it.

And this part of my original post bears repeating: if someone suggested with full enthusiasm that because some men abuse their 2nd Amendment rights (which they do in greater numbers than females) we should therefore take those rights away from all men, would you be furious? That’s where I am with all of this. Regardless of how the votes turned out, suggesting that my right to vote should be removed because of someone else’s behavior is despicable.

Don’t we have an electoral college that determines the official outcome of the Presidential election? Shouldn’t you take your issues up with those folks?