Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press Release: Army Refers Charges Against Lakin To Court Martial
Safeguard Our Constitution ^ | August 2, 2010 | Margaret Hemenway

Posted on 08/02/2010 5:29:53 AM PDT by captjanaway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-380 next last
To: deport

Missing movement carries the death penalty in times of war.

Article 92 is a tough one to prove since the Colonel has stated he is perfectly willing to obey his orders if it can be proved that Obama is a Natural Born citizen and eligible for the office.

The ultimate responsibility for whatever actions are taken in this war rest upon the office of the presidency.

Here is an example, Truman ordered the bomb dropped he did not choose the target or even when it would be dropped or by whom, as commander in chief he gave a simple order to use that weapon.

The same applies for Obama, he ordered a escalation of the war in Afghanistan and because of it this doctor was supposed to go over there.

The UCMJ does allow for refusing to obey illegal orders or commands but there is only one way where they can be proved to be illegal you have to suffer a court martial which is what we are seeing here.


61 posted on 08/02/2010 9:36:41 AM PDT by usmcobra (NASA outreach to Muslims if I were in charge:The complete collection of "I dream of Jeannie" on DVD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I recommend that you wrap your head around the law.

Why don't you take your own advice and wrap your head around Article II of the Constitution.

62 posted on 08/02/2010 9:58:03 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
I find it rather IRONIC that Nadal Hasan, sitting in a jail in Bell County, Texas is not considered AWOL from duty and is in fact receiving a check from the US military to the tune of $6,000/month, who murdered 13 US soldiers and one child and wounded 34 others. And who has NOT been suspended from military duty TO DATE! And you military men think that LTC Lakin is freaking AWOL from his duty station because he wants to DEFEND AND PROTECT the US Constitution as per his oath of service.

Great point, Rowdy, your post will hit a nerve with all the Hasan, err Obama defenders.

63 posted on 08/02/2010 10:01:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
That's about two 6 round bursts one to make them fall and the other to make sure..

You have to get it right the first time, otherwise you either have to call the medics or it is double-tap, depending on the situation.

64 posted on 08/02/2010 10:05:06 AM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Please demonstrate how Mr. Obama has violated Article II of the Constitution. And don’t come back with something that you read on the internet.

Here’s something that you can do about this. Get your state to enact legislation requiring that candidates for President present evidence that they are eligible for the Office IAW Art II. When Obama fails to produce the evidence, refuse to put him on the ballot. He will sue to be placed on the ballot without producing evidence. Now, you are in business and can go into court and play show and tell. Short of that, you are just whistlin’ Dixie.


65 posted on 08/02/2010 10:11:26 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
OK...lets defer back to the FR experts who predicted...no GUARANTEED...that Lakin would never be charged....
66 posted on 08/02/2010 10:11:58 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (Bush: Mission Accomplished. Obama: Commission Accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
Article 92 is a tough one to prove

No, that will be easy as the orders were legal. Proving that the orders were not legal will be impossible for all intents and purposes.

67 posted on 08/02/2010 10:14:44 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
I believe LTC Lakin & his civilian attorney knew full well that the issue of the usurper at the top of the chain of command would not be resolved in the military court(s).
They planed for his case to wind up at the SCOTUS after he has received an injury from the results of the court martial.
68 posted on 08/02/2010 10:25:49 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair
GUARANTEED...that Lakin would never be charged

I suspect that most of these folks did not know the Convening Authority, Major General Karl Horst. If they had known him, they might have changed their predictions. Not to worry though. They, his legal counsel, his friends who talked him into this will not be penalized in any way. Lakin will be the only one standing in front of the Court Martial when they pronounce the verdict. A tragedy that did not have to happen.

69 posted on 08/02/2010 10:37:03 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

You are one angry and ignorant B****.


70 posted on 08/02/2010 10:48:44 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

CHARGE I, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ. ARTICLE 87

The Specification: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 12 April 2010, through design, miss the movement of US Airways Flight Number 1123, departing from Baltimore/Washington International Airport arriving in Charlotte, North Carolina, in order to deploy for a Temporary Change of Station in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with the 32nd Calvary Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with which he was required in the course of duty to move.

CHARGE II, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ . ARTICLE 92

Specification 1: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Lieutenant Colonel William Judd, to report to the office of his Brigade Commander, Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, at 1345 hours, or words to that effect, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 31 March 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully not reporting as directed.

Specification 2: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, to wit: a memorandum signed by the said Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, dated 31 March 2010, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 31 March 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully not reporting as directed.

Specification 3: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Colonel Peter M. McHugh, to wit: Temporary Change of Station orders 099-17, dated 9 April 2010, issued by Colonel Peter McHugh, requiring the said Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin to report to Fort Campbell, Kentucky not later than 1500 hours on 12 April 2010, an order which it was his duty to obey, did at or near Washington, District of Columbia, on or about 12 April 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully failing to report to 32nd Calvary Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

Specification 4: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, who knew or should have known of his duties at or near Washington, District of Columbia, on or about 12 April 2010, was derelict in the performance of those duties in that he willfully failed to report to Fort Campbell, Kentucky in accordance with Temporary Change of Station orders 099-17, dated 9 April 2010, issued by Colonel Peter McHugh, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, as it was his duty to do.


71 posted on 08/02/2010 10:50:24 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: verity

No you are ignorant and delusional.
Wake up. Our troops are being used and killed by the Islamists cause they are in control. Go watch Tv and go back to your dream world.


72 posted on 08/02/2010 10:54:55 AM PDT by Frantzie (Television controls the American people/sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

This thread has a loads of Obama lovers. LTC Lakin is a hero. Seems like a lot of a*s kisser who kissed the brass a*s to get cheap smokes at the PX.


73 posted on 08/02/2010 10:57:53 AM PDT by Frantzie (Television controls the American people/sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
"Our troops are being used and killed by the Islamists cause they are in control."

What does this have to do with Lakin's Court Martial?

74 posted on 08/02/2010 11:02:32 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: verity

They are being set up by the Islamist. Go bow to Obama like a stooge. Amazing.


75 posted on 08/02/2010 11:05:21 AM PDT by Frantzie (Television controls the American people/sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Please demonstrate how Mr. Obama has violated Article II of the Constitution. And don’t come back with something that you read on the internet.

Ahh a true Obama defender. Answer this quiestion:

Is Barack Obama an Article II "natural born citizen"???

Yes or No.

76 posted on 08/02/2010 11:12:37 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I have no idea and neither do you. You think that just because I’m in touch with reality, I’m an Obama defender. What I do know is that he complied with all of the requirements to be listed on the ballots of the states, he received a majority of the votes cast and won enough electoral votes to be certified by the Congress as the winner and sworn in.

I don’t happen to agree with the rules as written, I think that candidates should be required to present evidence that demonstrates that they are eligible for the office.

So back to you, how did Mr. Obama violate Article II? Please include evidence that he is not as he claims, a natural born citizen.


77 posted on 08/02/2010 11:22:22 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
You are both angry and mad.

Having said that, I would be perfectly happy to have Lakin and Obummer share a cell for a decade or so.

78 posted on 08/02/2010 11:22:59 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
I believe LTC Lakin & his civilian attorney knew full well that the issue of the usurper at the top of the chain of command would not be resolved in the military court(s).

If that is their plan, they are really flying on a wing and a prayer. They would first have to exhaust the courts of military appeals, something very unlikely to occur, and then have the case heard by the Supreme Court. The military appeals courts will rule on the facts in the case. Since the Obama question will never come up, those rulings will be pretty cut and dry, certainly not something that would warrant consideration by the Supreme Court. Where did these guys go to law school: The Panama Beach School of Law and Tatooing?

79 posted on 08/02/2010 11:29:22 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I have no idea and neither do you.

So then based upon that blatant non-committal answer you post your nonsense here on this forum????

Come on -- get some cajones -- answer the question: Yes or No.

80 posted on 08/02/2010 11:30:32 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-380 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson