Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Insubordinate McChrystal Called Back to Washington for White House Meeting
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | Kristinn

Posted on 06/22/2010 4:07:18 AM PDT by kristinn

NBC News' Savannah Guthrie reports this morning that Gen. Stanley McChrystal is being called to Washington for a meeting at the White House tomorrow in the wake of a Rolling Stone article that has exposed McChrystal and his staff as mockingly disrespectful of their civilian overseers, including their commander-in-chief President Barack Obama.

Guthrie posted at Twitter:

McChrystal has been ordered to the Sit Rom tomorrow to explain his stmts criticizing admin officials to Rolling Stone to POTUS in person 15 minutes ago via UberTwitter

Guthrie added: "McChrystal has been calling around town apologizing to officials."

The Atlantic reported late last night that McChrystal had been called by numerous top officials last night:

Within hours after today's Rolling Stone story broke, McChrystal was called by the White House, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They were not happy.

The Atlantic also notes that McChrystal never completely had the trust of the Obama administration:

Even though McChrystal voted for Obama and told him so during their first meeting, he sensed that a number of senior White House aides didn't really believe that the former commander of the military's special missions unit during the Bush-Cheney years was suddenly on their side. National Security Adviser James Jones, who is a bit of cipher to McChrystal's team, may or may not have been one of these aides. No one in the West Wing bought all that liberal internet chatter about JSOC's alleged crimes -- but no one really didn't buy it, either.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; mcchrystal; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-333 next last
To: Grampa Dave
Here's you one more on a different thread.
251 posted on 06/22/2010 9:12:02 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: dools007
I wonder why he and his staff are belatedly speaking out—and through a leftist organ to boot.

Unrest in the ranks have them worried
252 posted on 06/22/2010 9:12:18 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Well said!


253 posted on 06/22/2010 9:13:12 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
You're wrong.

Actually I am right.

State of the Union Messages to the Congress are mandated by Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution...

True. But it does not mandate that the speech be given in person, and from the time of Thomas Jefferson up until Woodrow Wilson in 1913 the President informed Congress of the state of the Union in writing only. And presidents after Wilson have occasionally declined to give the state of the Union in person. The last president to do so was Carter in 1981.

Separation of powers denies the president the right to do much of anyting in the Capitol without invitation. That includes addressing the Congress, either jointly or separately.

254 posted on 06/22/2010 9:16:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; BOBTHENAILER; Liz

“How can one possibly be a serving General officer, and vote for the suicide of the nation he is sworn to protect?”

Amen!

When I read that he voted for Lord 0haha, any support/pity I might have had for him got flushed down into the sewer system.

A mental illness runs through the DNA of the current rats and those who supported and voted for them.

Trust no one in any position of responsibility who voted for Lord 0haha if they are in government or running/managing a business, a corporation or any military group.

Their allegiance is to their party and whatever damage that party does to America. They hate America and anyone who supports America and our constitution.


255 posted on 06/22/2010 9:19:23 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Not exactly. WAR is governance. There is a time for the military to "BE the governance."

I pray never within the borders of the nation

256 posted on 06/22/2010 9:20:03 AM PDT by chargers fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I’m late to the debate but here’s my take:

Voted for 0bama +
Publicly showed disrespect +
In an interview with ROLLING STONE! (Says enough) +
Calling around to apologize =

Unfit to command


257 posted on 06/22/2010 9:20:48 AM PDT by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

“Lord 0haha”...I like it. That’s definitely what he is, just like his namesake, an elitist traitor to his country.


258 posted on 06/22/2010 9:33:58 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
McChrystal's got a tough job.


259 posted on 06/22/2010 9:38:21 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maica
What was McChrystal thinking??????

Everyone wants to be a rock star. And to go on Leno. And Idol. SNL. And on Dancing with the Stars. That's why we have the dimwitted rejects from America's got Talent running the country, always looking in the mirror, hurrying to the next gig

260 posted on 06/22/2010 9:40:12 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“General, here’s your ass. Now, take a hike. You’re lucky we don’t just take you out into the Rose Garden and put a paper target over your heart. And, don’t ask for any retirement, either.”


261 posted on 06/22/2010 9:40:25 AM PDT by redhead (BP Gulf Blowout Debacle: Obama's CHERNOBYL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
This story did not happen accidentally. There is a struggle for control of the military. It is not exclusively between Oath Keepers and Oath Breakers but that is one of the fault lines. I repeat, this story did not happen accidentally and it is not really about dissing the Obamanoids.
H/T SipseyStreetIrregulars

★ FREEDOM! ★

262 posted on 06/22/2010 9:41:16 AM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER OathKeeper III We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Thanks!


263 posted on 06/22/2010 9:44:53 AM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul

Did he really?


264 posted on 06/22/2010 9:46:33 AM PDT by DrewsMum (Somebody please put the Constitution on his teleprompter....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
Even though McChrystal voted for Obama...

Hmmm...explains some things, perhaps?

I wonder who General Odierno and General Petraeus voted for?

265 posted on 06/22/2010 9:52:02 AM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

RACIST!


266 posted on 06/22/2010 9:53:40 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Why would a General, fighting a war, talk to Rolling Stone anyway?

He may be right about Obama but he should have learned from McArthur/Truman and kept his mouth shut


267 posted on 06/22/2010 9:55:30 AM PDT by hattend (The era of John McCain is over, the era of Ronald Reagan is back! Go Sarah Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

ping!


268 posted on 06/22/2010 9:57:23 AM PDT by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
McChrystal and his staff as mockingly disrespectful of their civilian overseers, including their commander-in-chief President Barack Obama.

These civilian overseers have all but destroyed this country.

269 posted on 06/22/2010 9:57:39 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
McChrystal is lucky he hasn’t been fired already.

Lucky why? He still has his government pension.

270 posted on 06/22/2010 9:59:27 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement that "it would be a grave mistake" to allow the controversy over the article to distract attention from the war effort. "Now is not the time for Washington to be sidetracked by chatter," Kerry said. "Everyone needs to take a deep breath." Kerry said he spoke with McChrystal by telephone Tuesday morning and stressed that U.S. leaders should remain focused on success in Afghanistan and the safety of U.S. troops.

Sounds like the democrats are scared crapless
271 posted on 06/22/2010 10:01:39 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

After the Iran /Contra hearings, Senator Kerry offered up a bill to revoke Col North’s military pension.


272 posted on 06/22/2010 10:02:48 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

At last, someone speaks the truth about the ten-year fiasco
in Afghanistan. What exactly is the mission? Why are we there? How can our magnificent forces be expected to fight a guerilla war with BOTH hands tied behind their back?

Why must our boys be maimed and killed to protect the drug routes of th Karzai Cartel?

Where is the air support that could take out these barbarians in short order?

McChrystal, God bless you for speaking the truth about Obama and his Clown Posse.


273 posted on 06/22/2010 10:04:58 AM PDT by Palladin (Commodore Obama: "Damn the Constitution. Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

lol, you silly boy. You still got it wrong.


274 posted on 06/22/2010 10:07:49 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

“Does it become a civil war?”

If it does, Mc Chrystal’s “insubordination” gives us an indication of whose side our fine military will be on.

Definitely NOT Obama’s.


275 posted on 06/22/2010 10:08:02 AM PDT by Palladin (Commodore Obama: "Damn the Constitution. Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mware

That would never happen.


276 posted on 06/22/2010 10:09:32 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

You’re kidding, right?

Someone should have told that to Gen. Robert E. Lee!


277 posted on 06/22/2010 10:09:56 AM PDT by Palladin (Commodore Obama: "Damn the Constitution. Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

Gets my vote....Those in D.C. are driving this country, our economy and standard of living into a ditch.


278 posted on 06/22/2010 10:10:45 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

I’m a neutral third party.


279 posted on 06/22/2010 10:13:12 AM PDT by sarcasmotron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Rush Limbaugh is now on his second hour of discussing this article. His theme is defense of McChrystal, who is desperate to see progress in Afghanistan.
280 posted on 06/22/2010 10:13:51 AM PDT by maica (Freedom consists not in doing what we like,but in having the right to do what we ought. John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

281 posted on 06/22/2010 10:15:01 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Generals have a right to disagree with the President when their consciences demand it.


282 posted on 06/22/2010 10:16:53 AM PDT by Palladin (Commodore Obama: "Damn the Constitution. Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Sorry about that comment: I was posting without first drinking my morning coffee.

The General is a fine gentleman and patriot who couldn’t take the crap any longer from the Obama Clown, then made some honest statements.


283 posted on 06/22/2010 10:17:36 AM PDT by Ronbo1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

The trouble with the Obama quotation you post is that it is only half right. Yes, he wants to create a large civililian force but he has hardly put the military on a diet. In fact, he has increased active duty forces on his watch. What many conservatives don’t understand is that Obama is an advocate of BOTH the welfare and warfare states.


284 posted on 06/22/2010 10:18:17 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Ronbo1948
The General is a fine gentleman and patriot who couldn’t take the crap any longer from the Obama Clown, then made some honest statements.

This "gentleman" is the same guy who covered up the Pat Tillman killing and was properly criticized here for that action. Please note that your "gentleman" hero also voted for Obama.

285 posted on 06/22/2010 10:20:26 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

It is somewhat amusing to read this here. I remember not so long when many of us were criticizing Bush’s top generals for disagreeing with his Iraq policy. Perhaps the problem here is not one of personality but policy e.g our failed effort to police the world.


286 posted on 06/22/2010 10:22:51 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Ronbo1948

We both agree totally.

Be well.

WH position: “What was he thinking!?!?!??!”

Answer: “You’re about to find out!”


287 posted on 06/22/2010 10:26:56 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Yes Obama didn’t remove all the troops from Afghanistan and Iraq but he wants to. Only kept them to look like he is doing something. Obama is misguiding the public.


288 posted on 06/22/2010 10:34:33 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
You still got it wrong.

Wrong because you say it's wrong? Thanks for clearing that up for us.

289 posted on 06/22/2010 10:45:21 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum

Yeah, he voted for the Jackass-in-Chief, but like many other voters, suffered almost immediate Buyer’s Remorse:

Even though he had voted for Obama,
McChrystal and his new commander in
chief failed from the outset to connect.
The general first encountered Obama
a week after he took office, when the
president met with a dozen senior military
officials in a room at the Pentagon
known as the Tank. According to sources
familiar with the meeting, McChrystal
thought Obama looked “uncomfortable
and intimidated” by the roomful of
military brass. Their first one-on-one
meeting took place in the Oval Office four
months later, after McChrystal got the
Afghanistan job, and it didn’t go much
better. “It was a 10-minute photo op,”
says an adviser to McChrystal. “Obama
clearly didn’t know anything about him,
who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going
to run his fucking war, but he didn’t
seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty
disappointed.

~~ RS article


290 posted on 06/22/2010 10:50:11 AM PDT by Palladin (Commodore Obama: "Damn the Constitution. Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; kristinn; jazusamo

How about this? There is so much we don’t know. McChrystal is not a stupid man. He had to have known this would be explosive.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2539055/posts

EDITORIAL: Obama’s Vietnam moment—Democrats plan to cut and run in Afghanistan
The Washington Times ^ | June 21, 2010 | Editorial

Posted on Monday, June 21, 2010 8:14:15 PM by jazusamo

The White House is clinging to President Obama’s ill-conceived pledge to begin withdrawing from Afghanistan in July 2011, regardless of how the war is going at the time. In dogmatically standing by that pledge, Mr. Obama is virtually guaranteeing he will preside over America’s second lost war.

The issue arose last week during congressional testimony when Central Command commander Gen. David H. Petraeus said that withdrawing from Afghanistan would be “based on conditions” and that “July 2011 is not the date where we race for the exits.” Au contraire, according to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. “The July [2011] date, as stated by the president, that’s not moving, that’s not changing,” he said Sunday. “Everybody agreed on that date.”

The scope of the withdrawal is yet to be decided, but according to Mr. Emanuel, the start date is necessary because it has “created a sense of urgency” among the allies to get the job done. Another thing creating a sense of urgency is the significantly degraded security situation in Afghanistan since Mr. Obama set this deadline. Insurgent attacks and coalition casualties are up; the areas of the country in which the Taliban are active have increased; and Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai is watching the United States with increasing wariness, knowing that soon he will have to face the Taliban alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...



291 posted on 06/22/2010 10:52:24 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Where is McChrystal right now?


292 posted on 06/22/2010 11:28:09 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
McChrystal voted for Obama - obviously he never saw The Usual Suspects:

"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist." [Kaiser Soze]

293 posted on 06/22/2010 11:31:16 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights; kristinn
McChrystal is not a stupid man. He had to have known this would be explosive.

Exactly...Late getting logged on this morning but read about McCrystal's and others remarks last night. Knew it would hit the fan today and it looks like it has. Before reading anything else it almost looks like he wanted to go out swinging, he had to have known it would be the end when speaking out like that if in fact it's all true.

Thanks for the ping.

294 posted on 06/22/2010 11:35:14 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Generals have a right to disagree with the President when their consciences demand it.

Not true - you are taught to respect the office, if not the man ...

If you disagree with policy, you resign your commission - and then you are free to make any statement you want or to stand for election to oppose him ...

McChrystal was unquestionably right in his opinion - and unquestionably wrong to give the interview before resigning his commission ...

295 posted on 06/22/2010 11:36:43 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

He voted for barry? hmmmmm That changes my opinion of him for sure.


296 posted on 06/22/2010 11:53:33 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

I agree, but maybe he just said that he voted for him but didn’t.


297 posted on 06/22/2010 11:54:27 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Yes Obama didn’t remove all the troops from Afghanistan and Iraq but he wants to

Not true. Obama has not only increased the size of active duty forces in the world but put MORE troops in Afghanistan than were called for even by John McCain. You mistake him for a peacenik. A better comparison is to a Woodrow Wilson or FDR who wants to maximize his power both at home and overseas. You seem to view Obama as someone who wants to abrogate his power in one area and maximize it in another. That is a contradiction. IMHO, he wants to maximize his power across the board.

298 posted on 06/22/2010 11:55:59 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

You make good points.


299 posted on 06/22/2010 12:02:20 PM PDT by Ronbo1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

The article states that this is the the first time the author has been published in Rolling Stone. From his description of how and when he was with McChrystal, it almost seems like he was ‘embedded.’ I wonder if he portrayed himself as a free lancer, pro-military troops, and then shopped the article to Rolling Stone?


300 posted on 06/22/2010 12:22:48 PM PDT by maica (Freedom consists not in doing what we like,but in having the right to do what we ought. John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-333 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson