Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Family Can Sue Highway Patrol Over Photos (Unbelievable Story, must read)
Courthouse News ^ | 02/03/2010 | Courthouse News

Posted on 02/03/2010 5:27:27 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour

SANTA ANA, Calif. (CN) - Two California Highway Patrol officers who emailed gruesome photos of a decapitated 18-year-old accident victim to their friends on Halloween, "for pure shock value," must answer to claims brought by the victim's family after the images "were strewn about the Internet and spit back at family members, accompanied by hateful messages," a California appeals court ruled.

Justice Richard Aronson revived the family's privacy claims and chided the officers for their allegedly "morally deficient" behavior. Officers Thomas O'Donnell and Aaron Reich emailed nine photos of Nikki Catsouras to their families and friends on Halloween night, and photos started "popping up in thousands of Web sites" across the United States and the United Kingdom, the ruling states.

The morbid photos were then "spit back" at the victim's family with taunts about their daughter. Catsouras' father, Christos Catsouras, received disturbing emails, including one entitled "Woo Hoo Daddy" that said, "Hey Daddy I'm still alive." "[F]amily members have a common law privacy right in the death images of a decedent," Justice Aronson ruled, overturning the lower court's decisions sustaining the officers' demurrers and dismissing the case. Though California law doesn't bar the media from discussing or portraying the life of a decedent, it does protect death images, the 4th District Court of Appeal ruled.

The Catsouras family had accused the officers of causing them emotional distress intentionally and with reckless disregard. Those accusations were enough to sustain the action, Justice Aronson ruled.

The court also allowed the family's negligence claims, ruling that the officers and the department had a duty of care not to put accident photos on the Internet. Aronson said the alleged actions were "morally deficient," and said he hoped the ruling would protect families from such abuses in the future. "We rely upon the CHP to protect and serve the public," Aronson wrote. "It is antithetical to that expectation for the CHP to inflict harm upon us by making the ravaged remains of our loved ones the subjects of Internet sensationalism. It is important to prevent future harm to other families by encouraging the CHP to establish and enforce policies to preclude its officers from engaging in such acts ever again."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: TruthHound

I’d go the other way around. Fire the cops and take their pensions, but not as much money to the family.


21 posted on 02/03/2010 6:32:45 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

As the father of an 18 year-old young woman, this sickens me beyond belief!


22 posted on 02/03/2010 6:32:53 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Distasteful, yes. However if the cop was a New York Times reporter and photographer then this would be seen as protected by the first amendment. While the officer is on our dime and therefore held to a different standard, I find it ironic that an industry whose motto is “if it bleeds it leads” would have any problem with this.


23 posted on 02/03/2010 7:13:35 PM PST by Martel1971
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svxdave

Incredibly disturbing. And I thought I’d seen it all.


24 posted on 02/03/2010 7:35:18 PM PST by boop (Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour; All

I did a little snooping on the web.

Nikki Catsaurass AKA PORSCHE GIRL

I found several references on the web. I guess this is why some people on the web are pissed. A spoiled rotten kid endangering other people on the road. See below. I edited a bit but several sources say the same thing.
I’m not excusing the leaking of the photos, but i can see why the public got pissed at the family because they couldn’t control their little girl.

Nikki and daddy had an arguement and he took away her car keys, so she took his Porsche without permission.

“Nikki Catsouras Driving a 2001 Porsche Carrera, the girl car crash because apparently, witnesses determines that running more than 100mph is a girl who doesn’t know how to drive. Her parents were going to admit her to a hospital again after she tested positive for COCAINE the night before she died 07 Sep, 2009”

Quote from ‘swvirtual.com Blogs


25 posted on 02/03/2010 9:22:14 PM PST by 1FASTGLOCK45 (FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

This reminds me of the “gallows humor” jerks here on FR that will make jokes whenever some poor soul dies in a horrific way.


26 posted on 02/03/2010 9:45:27 PM PST by IDontLikeToPayTaxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1FASTGLOCK45
This is the car the decedent hit before running into the 241 toll booth at 100mph.



I used to drive the 241. I hate to imagine if that was my car with my 2 year old daughter in the back seat.

Children are a reflection of the parenting that creates them. The Catsouras family deserves no monetary compensation. They should be thankful their handiwork didn't kill anybody else in the process.

I hope other parents in "disney land" O.C. take a good look and pay attention; and understand that while "the rules don't apply to them" - the laws of Physics still do.
27 posted on 02/04/2010 9:16:07 AM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson