Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake Obama Kenya birth certificate?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate ^ | 08/02/2009

Posted on 08/02/2009 4:56:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

And then one of our moderators spotted this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate

It has several clues, but also there's this question:

Who is E. F. Lavender?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=earth+friendly+lavender&aq=f&oq=&aqi

Earth Friendly Lavender detergent?


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; areyouseries; article2section1; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; charlesjohnson; citizenship; edmorrissey; eligibility; fake; hawaii; hillary; hoax; honolulu; hotair; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; lgf; littlegreenfootballs; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; pumas; republicofkenya; taitz; thisishugh; usurper; waitforit; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,181-1,190 next last
To: Jim Robinson

181 posted on 08/02/2009 6:16:49 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Oh come on, you know that babies always arrive on their due dates! ;)


182 posted on 08/02/2009 6:17:11 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

#59 is incorrect. The second image with “E.F. Lavender” is just a close-up of the first image. But WND did say they inspected another Kenyan BC for consistencies and it checked out... they just didn’t say anything about a second signature from E.F.

I’m totally up in the air on this. I want to believe it, but I don’t want to get burned.


183 posted on 08/02/2009 6:17:36 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: kenboy

Well, perhaps you can explain what section three of the Twentieth amendment means with the phrase “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” What on earth could this be talking about?


184 posted on 08/02/2009 6:17:38 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Someone went to ALOT of trouble to make this appear real.
What about the Divorce papers?


185 posted on 08/02/2009 6:17:42 PM PDT by Marty62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

I don’t get the feeling that ‘E.F. Lavender’ is a person but that it is more like a district or registar name..perhaps named after a person back in the day.


186 posted on 08/02/2009 6:18:10 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

I ask again what may be a dumb question: Wouldn’t one expect the occasional bureaucrats/registrars to have British names, given the deep ties between the two nations? How different is it from someone like Paul Running Bear signing a BC for a kid born to a German mother while she is visiting an Indian reservation here? Not the best example, but you get my drift. I’m neither advocating nor rejecting this document’s validity. I’m just posing a question about this particular point that has everyone so riled.


187 posted on 08/02/2009 6:18:23 PM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Somebody made a good point :

>Not “anal”. Just asking questions like everyone else here. It simply makes no sense to me that two people would travel to a 3rd country, not either of their home countries, to have their child. If you think that’s perfectly understandable, fine. I don’t.
<


188 posted on 08/02/2009 6:18:28 PM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

Which means that the “E.F. Lavender” signature in no way calls this latest document into question.

And the number: If it weren’t 47044, it would be something else—and somebody could come up with reasons that it COULDN’T be a coincidence.

I’m not convinced this is an “obvious forgery” yet.


189 posted on 08/02/2009 6:18:40 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
This Kenyan Birth Certificate is a fake as CBS memos about President Bush national guard. Free Republic was the first to expose the CBS fake memos and I hope that Free Republic will not fall for a fake Kenyan birth certificate.

It is good Jim that you spoke on this issue.

190 posted on 08/02/2009 6:20:17 PM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
In case anyone is interested, Attorney Orly is to be on the Bill Cunningham show tonight at 10:00 Eastern. Here is the link:

http://www.premiereradio.com/shows/view/live_on_sunday_night.html

191 posted on 08/02/2009 6:20:28 PM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Since the Copy of the Birth Certificates states “Signature of Registrar—— E.F. Lavendar” and the Signature on the bottom of the document is the ‘Deputy Registrar’ and signed by “Joshua Simon Oduya”, that only shows they are two different people representing the government Registrar’s office.

The first, E.F. Lavender, is the name of the registrar in 1961 whose name appears on the referenced record in book 44B on page 5733. The second, E.H. Miller, is the registrar in 1964 at the time the certificate attesting to the content of the record was prepared. Joshua Simon Oduya is Mr. Miller's assistant who prepared and signed the document.

192 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:06 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: donna

To dilute the issue. To make it seem like they are all fake. Oldest playlist in the book.


193 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:22 PM PDT by FReepapalooza (Joshua 3:4 ..."for ye have not passed this way heretofore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I just looked up the origin of the surname Lavender, and it is English. I’m agnostic on this particular document, but I don’t yet see this name as a problem in a country with close ties to England and, thus, entrenched British-surnamed bureaucrats.


194 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:32 PM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: shield

102181 sealed it for me fake of well


195 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:48 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: shield

102181 sealed it for me fake of well


196 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:49 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Not sure ... I did come across a William and a Frederick Lavender predating E.F., both registrars, IIRC.

FWIW.


197 posted on 08/02/2009 6:22:53 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Pokemon ace may miss out on world
By RANDY ERICKSON | randy.erickson@lee.net
.
Joshua Simon has been ranked No. 1 or 2 in the world for most of the Pokemon Trading Card Game season, but it looks like it might not be in the cards for him to earn a top rank in head-to-head competition at the world competition next month in San Diego, Calif.>


198 posted on 08/02/2009 6:23:06 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Not “anal”. Just asking questions like everyone else here. It simply makes no sense to me that two people would travel to a 3rd country, not either of their home countries, to have their child. If you think that’s perfectly understandable, fine. I don’t.

And what I'm saying is that there are a million and one reasons why someone might do something that might seem on the face of it to be illogical or unreasonable.

199 posted on 08/02/2009 6:23:22 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: saquin

Zanzibar was not a “third country.” The whole region was British-controlled but with differing structures. Mombasa was “nominally” under the control of Zanzibar, which, I believe, had at least the notion of some “autonomy” rather than a direct British colony. But Zanzibar was under heavy British influence. Eventually most of Zanzibar went with Tangyanika to form Tanzania but Mombasa went to Kenya. But it had long-standing ties to Kenya. In 1961, going to Mombasa from Kenya was not exactly “going to a third country.”


200 posted on 08/02/2009 6:23:27 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,181-1,190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson