You thank God that philosophical naturalism is taught in public school science classes even after you know that it is based on multiple, logical fallacies?
"Unfortunately, the creationist’s tortured, weak-in-faith defense of his position is presented by the media as representative of the viewpoint of all Christians."
Unfortunately, it appears that you haven't understood a single point about the multiple logical fallacies underlying the theory of evolution and apparently can't recognize a complete lack of critical-thinking skills either. And accepting the media's definition of a position is typically not consistent with the reality of the position.
"The majority of us, therefore, appear feeble-minded by association, and we don’t like it."
I note your repeat of the fallacy of appeal to popularity after having it explained to you. While I tend to agree with your conclusion, I don't think the association is the problem...
“You thank God that philosophical naturalism is taught in public school science classes even after you know that it is based on multiple, logical fallacies? “
The point is that it is NOT based on the fallacies that you assert.
“Unfortunately, it appears that you haven’t understood a single point about the multiple logical fallacies underlying the theory of evolution...”
Unfortunately, I don’t believe that you know what a “logical fallacy” is. Just because you disagree with a point doesn’t make it fallacious.
Really, stop taking talking points from answersingenesis.com.