Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Just Issued A Request To Debate Barry

Posted on 03/04/2009 9:27:50 AM PST by NoGrayZone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-449 next last
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The inner conflict between 0bama's abject fear and his narccicism would be interesting to behold.

Obama debating himself would prove rather interesting, I would think.

341 posted on 03/04/2009 12:42:36 PM PST by meyer (Obama is to the USA as Mugabe is to Zimbabwe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Thanks.


342 posted on 03/04/2009 12:42:41 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
IT DOESN'T MATTER! IT DOESN'T MATTER! IT DOESN'T MATTER!

Yes, it does. It matters a lot more than a fight that Rush is more than happy to keep alive.

You've got your loudly-expressed opinion -- and it's justified. But it's a simple fact that the more time Obama spends fighting individual media personalities, the more damage he's doing to himself. Rush will be just fine.

Oh, and if Rush isn't that smart, and his program "does little to advance conservative thought", then why is he being singled out? Hmmmmmm? Why isn't John Derbyshire? Why isn't Rich Lowry? Why isn't [insert name here]?

Let's be clear. Rush is a talented entertainer who knows his audience, and who knows exactly how to play to conservatives' emotional responses. That's not an intellectual basis for anything. Rush's format does not permit him to spend time on anything other than a narrow set of topics, shallowly addressed. It's fine for what it is -- but it will never enable another Reagan-class political revolution.

That will serve Rush very well: he's blessed by his enemies in this case. Just as a debate would be conducted on a ground of Obama's choosing, this little flap is being conducted on Rush's home turf. Obama cannot compete there, and he's a fool for trying to do so.

343 posted on 03/04/2009 12:42:48 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Hanna548
Just why is it that you think Rush is as popular as he is?

Rush is a very talented entertainer who knows how to play to his audience. His political views are undoubtedly sincere -- but in regard to his ratings, they're secondary to his ability to entertain.

And what do you think of those of us who listen to him?

There are lots of reasons why people listen to Rush ... why would I assume anything in particular about you or any other individual?

344 posted on 03/04/2009 12:46:03 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Black Oblack couldn’t debate Rush if Limbaugh only answered half the questions.

Pray for America, Our Troops and obama’s Failure


345 posted on 03/04/2009 12:46:27 PM PST by bray (Welcome to the USSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
"How does one "issue" a debate?

I do believe your "question" is one of snark, so therefore, I will not advise you to read through the thread for an answer to your "question".

346 posted on 03/04/2009 12:48:27 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Good for you. You have your own reasoned explanation for Rush’s success. And approximately 20 million others disagree. Certainly that’s a small number when compared to the rest of America. But it’s not insignificant when compared to the readership or listening audience of other conservative spokesmen, is it.

Good day.


347 posted on 03/04/2009 12:48:33 PM PST by bcsco (Illinois politicians should be read their Miranda rights when sworn in to office...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
I do believe your "question" is one of snark

Of course it is.

It's hard to resist pointing out the mangled-up writing of others.

348 posted on 03/04/2009 12:54:52 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: malos
I would rather see Andrew Wilcow represent our side. The guy’s a pit bull.

Who?

349 posted on 03/04/2009 12:58:44 PM PST by saminfl ( FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker
There’s a reason that a guy with only a high school education could become a very rich man on his own.

There are probably a half-dozen Rush bashing freepers here that disagree with you.

350 posted on 03/04/2009 1:01:25 PM PST by saminfl ( FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Then just what the hell has all this been about? Rush didn't start it except for saying he hopes Obama's policies fail.

True; and so do I. That's a far different matter than what I think Rush's chances would be if Obama actually agreed to a head-to-head debate. I stand by my assertion that Obama would hand him his rear end in that format.

And that doesn't justify a personal attack by the president. And if they realize they have nothing to gain (as you say), then why go down this road regardless of what Rush says.

Actually, it marks Obama as a damned fool for giving traction to Rush's remarks. Had he simply let it go, Rush's comments wouldn't ever have seen the light of day outside his niche audience.

Rush is doing a great job of keeping Obama engaged -- and for the life of me I can't figure out why Obama continues to take the bait, other than to chalk it up to his (Obama's) narcissism.

After all, you've said he isn't that influential.

That's not what I said at all. What I said was, that Rush's show is not suited to rebuilding the intellectual foundations of conservatism. Surely you can see the difference?

On that note, we need to be aware Rush is leading us into dangerous territory -- because we've lost our intellectual foundations, it can be very easy for the MSM to paint Limbaugh's opinions as defining "conservatism." Rush is a tempting target: his publicly-stated opinions are tailored to a talk radio audience, and as such cannot be fully fleshed out. Nor does Rush have either the time or (to be frank) the background to form a deeper conservative philosophy. His opinions, such as they're presented on-air, are little more than strawmen, however well-informed Rush himself might be.

As a result, the MSM doesn't actually have to address conservatism in an intellectually rigorous way -- they need only dispense with Limbaugh's necessarily sketchy statements, which is a far easier thing to do.

351 posted on 03/04/2009 1:04:35 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: saminfl

Their problem not mine :)


352 posted on 03/04/2009 1:06:20 PM PST by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Rush is showing them how to Alinsky the Alinskyites. He has chosen Obama, froze him, personalized him, and pantsing him.


353 posted on 03/04/2009 1:07:43 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

You are one of the half dozen I mentioned.


354 posted on 03/04/2009 1:11:17 PM PST by saminfl ( FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Well good for you. Job well done. Here is your government cheese as your take home prize. Don't eat it all in one sitting.
355 posted on 03/04/2009 1:12:42 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Good for you. You have your own reasoned explanation for Rush’s success. And approximately 20 million others disagree. Certainly that’s a small number when compared to the rest of America. But it’s not insignificant when compared to the readership or listening audience of other conservative spokesmen, is it.

Let's just put it this way: if Rush is such a tremendous boon to conservatism, why is it that we're in such dire political straits?

The answer is pretty apparent: for all that he's popular with his audience, he doesn't have much influence beyond his audience; and most of that audience would probably vote the same way regardless of whether or not Rush was on the air.

The question we really have to deal with is not Obama's taking the bait, but rather whay it will take for conservatism to reach a wider audience in a way that's intellectually respectable?

You need to ask yourself why Obama is able to get away with engaging Rush at all. I think it's unpleasant but true that most Americans -- that other several dozen million who do not listen to Rush -- don't consider his opinions to be intellectually compelling.

356 posted on 03/04/2009 1:15:00 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
You are one of the half dozen I mentioned.

Lovely. Have you got a rational response to anything I've said? Or are you simply playing an Obama-esque "bogeyman" card?

357 posted on 03/04/2009 1:18:21 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 50mm; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; AliVeritas; Allegra; Allosaurs_r_us; ...

///// #PPPPPPP

DTG 042115Z MAR 09

T O P S E C R E T VIKINGKITTEN

SUBJ: ZOT

RE: POST 140

1. WATCH NCOIC HAS CONFIRMED REPEAT CONFIRMED TROLL SIGHTING, THIS DTG, THIS LOCATION. FR MOD COMMAND HAS INITIATED COMMAND-DIRECTED ZORCH ON TARGET (ZOT).

2. WATCH NCOIC HAS CONCLUDED BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA) FOLLOWING STRIKE TERMINATION ORDER. BDA EVALUATES STRIKE EFFECT AS LEVEL-ONE “ASHES TO ASHES”.

3. ALL ELEMENTS ARE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE OPTION “DOGPILE” UPON RECEIPT OF THIS MSG. GENERAL ORDER ONE IS SUSPENDED THIS OCCASION.

4. ALL ELEMENTS ARE DIRECTED TO RALLY POINT BARRACUDA FOR AFTER-ACTION REVIEW (AAR) AND ISSUE OF STANDARD-SIZE 24-OUNCE SERVING OF CAPPUCINO.

5. ADMIN NOTE: INTERESTED PARTIES MAY BE INCLUDED IN, OR REMOVED FROM, THE VIKING KITTIES TROLL-WATCH ALERT ROSTER BY FREEPMAILING THE WATCH NCOIC, CODENAME “OLD SARGE”, SUBJECT: ALERT ROSTER.

6. CHALLENGE/PASSWORD: VALHALLA-OVERLORD.

#/////

NOTHING FOLLOWS

EOM EOM EOM


358 posted on 03/04/2009 1:20:27 PM PST by Old Sarge ("Remember, remember, the Fourth of November, the Socialist treason and plot...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: TheUnderground

Beats it troll. Your communist schill would be decimated by Rush.


359 posted on 03/04/2009 1:24:05 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

I had a block of that Government cheese back in ‘84.

It was pretty good!

Sharp cheddar and crumbly. Good stuff.


360 posted on 03/04/2009 1:27:02 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson