Skip to comments.Report: Macy's execs get bonuses day after cutting 7,000 jobs
Posted on 02/04/2009 10:33:03 AM PST by Wolfie
click here to read article
My question would be, did the actions taken by the executives save Macy’s from going under? Bonuses from 2004 are not worthy of discussion in 2009.
It is a shame isn’t it. Even conservtives are falling for the leftist trick of demonization of that you want to conquer.
I hope that some of the people here who want CEO pay cut and laid off workers rehired and businesses that laid off workers boycotted, will step back and also right some historical wrongs:
Isn’t it about time the government got involved and rehired all those people laid off from the beaver skin cap companies? Those filthy capitalist bastards laid everybody off when the market for beaver fur collapsed.
Then we can turn to helping the blacksmiths union and the horse feed industry.
They’re bonuses from 2004 that were agreed upon long before the current economic crisis. So what’s the big deal?
Yes! In this case, I was just looking at a Clairborne shirt and some Bostonian loafers.
It's called free enterprise.
A “company that lost money”? What are you talking about? They made more than $700 million in the past year.
And I’m guessing the job cuts were a smart business decision in a shrinking economy.
Sounds as if the compensation is in the form of stock. When employees get stock as compensation,they have to wait years before they can finally cash all in. If it’s in the form of options, then the stock has to be above where it priced at when they were first awarded.
I’m getting the feeling that the media is trying to get us all to become anti business.
shouldn’t the federal government be cutting jobs too?
Just awesome....Macy’s execs get compensated for poor performance (regardless if it is from 2004...the company is losing money, now)...all the while pushing the burden of 7000 employees on the government....as we the taxpayer fund those 7000 until they find another job (thru unemployment, food stamps, taxpayer paid re-training, etc)...of course, if they find another job in this bad economy....
Business Socialism running amok....
“People dont take the responsibilty and trouble to go into business to employ people, they go into business to make a profit.”
This has been happening at AMR/AA since pilots, attendants and mechanics made huge concessions to save our company from bankruptcy back in, I believe, 2003. Since 2003, we have been living on my husband’s salary which is still 40% LESS per year than his salary in 2003.
When pilots and employees are being furloughed, and we’re trying to save our company, I’m sorry, but NO one should be receiving bonuses until we are all back onto the playing field.
If that’s what it took to make a profit. If you don’t like it
start up a business that will employ 500 million people and
put them out of business. (But don’t use the government to do
it.) You’ll have to look up in the Constitution what the
government’s job exactly is.
So what? Many salespeople and others on incentive pay program deserve and should receive “bonuses”. In many cases this is a part of their total compensation. Besides I haven’t heard that the gummint bailed out Macy’s (yet!) so it’s no concern of theirs.
My new business plan:
Get rid of bonuses and competitive pay for executives.
Over hire and over pay low level employees, especially when sales are down.
And then tell the government, “we’re too big to fail... we need a few billion.”
So if you were earned compensation in 2004 that was contractually paid over several years, you shouldn’t get paid what you are owed?
Who makes these decisions, Macy’s or Federated Department Stores which owns Macy’s?
Lets see, a communist muslim from Kenya lies his way into the WH promising to raise taxes and redistribute wealth and he’s surprised that corporations are cutting costs and hiding money?
A real economic genius, this lawyer from Harvard who’s tuition was mysteriously paid for by a muslim extremist, and there ain’t no 1994 GOP revolution in the works to turn this around.
Corporations are doing exactly what POTUS MUZZIE HUSSEIN and his commie comrades least expected; giving the USSA government all of the responsibility for the workers they no longer need because they don’t have the money to pay them anymore and still remain profitable.
They’re shedding them before the socialist government makes it illegal to fire people.
You're the one advocating what could be described as "business socialism"--the idea that businesses somehow have a responsiblity take care of employees, even when those employees are no longer profitable to keep, rather than make money.
And Macy's is not losing money. Why do you post incorrect information here?
Aren’t some of these retired employees contractually owed their retirements, too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.