Posted on 01/10/2009 6:07:43 AM PST by user500
Story after story, all I ever hear is that Caroline is capable of raising money for the party. That’s it! Even when problems with her speech, experience etc. are mentioned, they are quickly countered with this “money raising” ability. I can’t believe it!
So why don’t they just make her head of the DNC, or even head of the NY dem part, if money is all they care about?
NY needs an advocate, and someone of her limited experience and verbal skills would not be the best selection. And it’s not fair with respect to other NY candidates, many of whom are infinitely more qualified and experienced than is she.
Not a good start noob. That's the MO of a troll
(Sarge I think we have a live one.)
Uh.. she’s a DEM.
Once again, posters who have been here a while go after someone who just signed up today. If they think a post is such a waste of time, why do they take the time to write these snotty responses? If they don’t like a post, they should just skip it and go on to the next. There are THOUSANDS of posts here to which they could respond.
But yes, I agree with your initial premise - how is the Caroline scenario so different from that of the Blago/Burris pay-for-play?
“she can pony up more money for the republican party than anyone else.”
Ms Kennedy is a Dem.
The poster made a simple mistake - we knew what they meant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.