Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Let's hope they die before the unFairness Doctrine can save most of the local liberal Democrat rags around the country.
1 posted on 12/12/2008 5:16:57 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37
Aint it great to watch the print media die?

What's a print media? Never heard of 'em...

2 posted on 12/12/2008 5:20:36 AM PST by Onelifetogive (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Ordinarily,I would say yes, it is great to watch the print media die, but at the same time, I also notice that my country is dying with them. I wonder if the two deaths are related...


3 posted on 12/12/2008 5:21:38 AM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

....I really hate the way newspapers have turned on America....it’s good they’re getting kicked in the teeth....next, let’s torpedo the Hollywood Left....then go after the Academy....if nobody signs up for Lefty professors’s classes they’ll go broke too.


4 posted on 12/12/2008 5:25:49 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Self-inflicted suicide. Watch for a few that stay in business, and notice that those few will decidedly NOT be a de facto wing of the DNC.

What's killing them isn't the medium as much as it's the message. Look how blatently they were in the tank for Obama this election cycle. With bias that obvious, who wouldn't look elsewhere for their factual news?

5 posted on 12/12/2008 5:28:03 AM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

“Ain’t it great to watch the print media die?

...until Obama bails them out.


7 posted on 12/12/2008 5:28:57 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Is this cause for celebration?

No. I could wish the news business was at least balanced, or non-biased, but I really don't want to see the print media die.

Too bad we don't have any choices, though. I would gladly subscribe to a conservative newspaper if there was one available.

So die they will, and it serves them right for trying to steer policy by printing lies.

11 posted on 12/12/2008 5:36:38 AM PST by Designer (We are SO scrood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Better Red than Read; whoops, we’re Dead!


12 posted on 12/12/2008 5:40:39 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

I miss the print media, the REAL print media. I like reading the paper. It’s so old-school now. I don’t like having to be hooked up to an electronic device to get my news. I miss sitting in my schleppy clothes, having some tea and reading the paper page-by-page. I can’t even remember the last time I was able to do it. It’s too big a health risk now.


14 posted on 12/12/2008 5:51:31 AM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

“Ain’t it great to watch the print media die?”

Not at all.
For one thing, it’s a vital part of democracy.
For another, I never cheer when fellow citizens loose their jobs.


15 posted on 12/12/2008 5:53:21 AM PST by Bunkasaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Some dare call it treason. Others just call them presstitutes (with apologies to genuine and honorable streetwalkers).
22 posted on 12/12/2008 6:19:03 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth ($750 billion is nothing - surrender your children, wealth and gold fillings now to avoid the rush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

IF some brave, moral soul started publishing a fair and balanced newspaper, could it survive?

Maybe the liberal biggies should save their lives by trying “fair and balanced.” It might be their only salvation.

(Then, again...who cares?)


24 posted on 12/12/2008 6:22:46 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

If the bailouts continue,

I guarantee the Democrat supporting media will be on the list.

The democrats would like nothing more than to have an actual (they already have de facto) controlling interest in all major media.


28 posted on 12/12/2008 6:26:16 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
I don't disagree with the author but he could have used a better CNN example that went on longer and was more recent. CNN admitted that they avoided running stories of Saddam's atrocities in order to keep their access in Iraq.
32 posted on 12/12/2008 6:36:39 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

There was a time when the print media used to be dignified and truthful. Now they are just a bunch of rags so as for me and mine... “We are lovin’ every minute of it when we hear another one has gone south.”


35 posted on 12/12/2008 6:58:00 AM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket


38 posted on 12/12/2008 5:56:23 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

All the MSM should die...


39 posted on 12/12/2008 5:56:51 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Newspapers: the buggy whip of media.

I was talking about this with some friends the other day. The internet has killed newspapers, but it's not because of biased reporting, or only incidentally because of that. It's because all those things you NEEDED a paper for you don't need it for anymore. Who looks up movie show times in the paper anymore? Weather? The latest sports scores? Stocks? All internet now. Major newspapers as we know them had a good run--120 years or so. But now their time has passed. Interestingly, blogs seem a fair analogy for what newspapers were before that period--idiosyncratic, partisan, etc.

When one of my friends objected to this analysis, I said, "Yeah, I still miss the town crier, too"

40 posted on 12/12/2008 6:04:46 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

God forbid we experience a regional/national blackout...we would go primitive in less than 30 days.

They’ll shrink of course. But there will always be a New York Times...even if they move to a much small building. ;^)

And if the above happens, the newspaper will cost you 5 bucks a copy. If you can find one.


42 posted on 12/12/2008 6:42:28 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson