Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We need to accept Sen. Obama's explanation of the 'lipstick/pig' insult this morning,,,,,

Posted on 09/10/2008 3:50:32 PM PDT by stockstrader

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2008 3:50:32 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Another take...

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2008/09/lipstick-on-pig.html


2 posted on 09/10/2008 3:52:44 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Actually that comment just proves that Obama is not prepared to be president. There is no way he could defend America from her enemies if he cannot even tell the difference between a pit bull and a pig !
3 posted on 09/10/2008 3:54:53 PM PDT by LOC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

LOL!

Well, o-k then. Based on that understanding.


4 posted on 09/10/2008 3:54:57 PM PDT by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
I accepted his explanation, too (even though I'm really enjoying the democrats squirm in a bed of their own making) then I saw the clip of Hussein making a derogatory reference to Hillary during the primaries & scratching his cheek with his middle finger while the crowd hooted.

I now think it is very possible that such a small minded man would consider making such a crude and sophomoric quip.

5 posted on 09/10/2008 3:55:29 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

I believe it was done on purpose. But there is no way to prove so the McCain campaign should drop it,
It has been put out in the arena of ideas for people to judge.


6 posted on 09/10/2008 3:56:24 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Help fight the left's anointed candidate, contribute and work for McCain/Palin..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Obama’s sin isn’t meaning. Its symbolism and timing.

Lipstick in the context of his opposition is Sarah Palin, plain and simple. Not recognizing that is to ignore the phenomenon sweeping the country right now, which may explain why his campaign has been off kilter since her introduction.


7 posted on 09/10/2008 3:56:33 PM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

After Rick Lazio’s being pilloried by the left for sexism for daring to approach Hillary’s podium during the Senatorial debate, Hussein deserves everything he’s getting.


8 posted on 09/10/2008 3:59:48 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: stockstrader

LOL!!! You got me for a while with that one!!!


10 posted on 09/10/2008 4:01:06 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

OK. I accept that he’s not ready for prime time.


11 posted on 09/10/2008 4:02:29 PM PDT by airborne (Rudy is right! They would never treat a man like this!! DON'T MESS WITH A HOCKEY MOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
"I believe it was done on purpose. But there is no way to prove so the McCain campaign should drop it"

I'm in total agreement there. Where McCain should hit them is on the CLEAR plagiarism used for his attacks against McCain/Palin.

SWINEGATE GENESIS & ANALYSIS: "Lipstick on a Pig" Template and Tom Toles Plagiarism

12 posted on 09/10/2008 4:03:51 PM PDT by KoRn (Barack Obama Must Be Stopped!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

If you watch the video, you notice that Obama pauses, just prior to making that statement, and shields his eyes from the audience while he then says it.

That is a ‘tell’.

He knew what he was about to say, and what implication it would have with his audience.

I would bet money that his campaign staff spent days working on the ultimate line that they could have him deliver, using the word ‘lipstick’ and still have plausible deniability.


13 posted on 09/10/2008 4:03:56 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pipecorp

You are naughty!


14 posted on 09/10/2008 4:04:33 PM PDT by airborne (Rudy is right! They would never treat a man like this!! DON'T MESS WITH A HOCKEY MOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
The problem here, is the hypocrosy.

It was ok for Obama to totally take out of context, John McCain's “hundred years in Iraq” comments,
but all of a sudden John McCain is a liar, when turnabout is done to Obama.

No whiners in the White House !

15 posted on 09/10/2008 4:04:34 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I saw the clip of Hussein making a derogatory reference to Hillary during the primaries & scratching his cheek with his middle finger while the crowd hooted.

I saw that clip as well. He does love to play to his crowd and friends, doesn't he.

16 posted on 09/10/2008 4:05:00 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

It doesn’t matter if he was comparing Palin to a pig. His campaign is falling apart and he allowed us to distract him all day over this issue. It shows an amateurish campaign. LBJ once told a campaign aid to accuse his opponent of being a child molester. His campaign aid told him his opponent was definitely not a child molester and Johnson replied, “I know he isn’t, I just want to hear him deny it.” We’ve had a whole day of Obama denying he called a woman a pig.


17 posted on 09/10/2008 4:05:30 PM PDT by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

He was trying to provoke his audience by comparing Palin to a pig and worse an old fish. He succeeded in it, but completely misjudged how this would spread virally over the political landscape.

The McCain campaign needs to let it go though and let the fire rage at the grassroots.


18 posted on 09/10/2008 4:06:41 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
I get it. Either he is totally clueless , wildly stupid, etc, and meant slip a little shiv in her,
or he is totally clueless , wildly stupid, etc, and didn't meant it.

Right. Either he is, or else, um, he is. If I have offended Obama, or anyone else by thinking that he had a clue, a brain, etc, and was in control of his mouth and/or his speech writers, then by all means, I apologize.
19 posted on 09/10/2008 4:07:35 PM PDT by caveat emptor (Are we having fun yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

or not...........

mrs


20 posted on 09/10/2008 4:07:49 PM PDT by proudmilitarymrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson