Skip to comments.
Let the sun do it - Going solar saves more than money
Daily Hampshire Gazette ^
| 03/08/08
| Bob Flaherty
Posted on 03/08/2008 8:50:51 PM PST by vrwc54
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
1
posted on
03/08/2008 8:50:54 PM PST
by
vrwc54
To: vrwc54
Global warming looks really cold and snowy up there!
2
posted on
03/08/2008 8:52:06 PM PST
by
vrwc54
To: vrwc54
I'm going to burn some old tires to make up for this guy's "contribution" to the environment.
(sticks out tongue)
3
posted on
03/08/2008 8:54:19 PM PST
by
SIDENET
(Hubba Hubba...)
To: vrwc54
“For example, if Dee and Jarred are using their computers at the same time, a large chunk of stored energy is swallowed up.”
These must be huge computers, or their actual solar capacity is tiny.
Mine uses 285W total.
There are more caveats than facts in this article.
4
posted on
03/08/2008 8:56:04 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: vrwc54
“Dee, a sculptor from Wisconsin who spent many of her formative years protesting nuclear power plants on Lake Michigan.”
You’re part of the problem, not the solution.
5
posted on
03/08/2008 8:56:55 PM PST
by
Tex Pete
(Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions)
To: vrwc54
'Potentially, this could get very bad,' said Clapp. 'We could be back in the Dark Ages.'You're already there.
To: vrwc54
Kumbaya my friends, kumbaya...
7
posted on
03/08/2008 9:15:12 PM PST
by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: vrwc54
'Six hours of direct sun generates enough electricity, as long as you're conservative, to last three or four days,' said John Clapp, 59. 'With heavy use, it might only last a day.'Herein lies one of many problems. Energy must be reliable and plentiful. If you want to live by candles, and cook on open fires, fine, you are free to do so.
But until there are viable, and more economical energy resources than those that are currently available, we are forced to go with those that are most viable and most economically available. Average middle class people have no other choice. We cannot sell out our families for pie in the sky technology.
So I wish that the greenies would spare me all this nonsense. When it's ready to go, I'll sign up. I'd be happy to. But it's not ready to go. Until it is, the efforts to persuade us to use it are nothing more than intrusion and harrasment.
8
posted on
03/08/2008 9:15:15 PM PST
by
squidly
To: vrwc54
Three of the 13 rooms in the house are used for the Starlight Llama Bed & Breakfast, which the couple operates, interestingly enough, not as a strict money-making venture, but as a way to introduce guests to solar power.
Thirteen rooms? Are they related to John Edwards or Algore? Great busuness acumen there: you have 13 rooms and three are for the B&B. Aside from their bedroom and room for the kids, they should still have more than three rooms available for their "business."
9
posted on
03/08/2008 9:16:02 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: vrwc54
Though this bold plan would require huge federal subsidies over a 30-year period... Oh OK. No worries. Sign me up. /s
10
posted on
03/08/2008 9:17:46 PM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: vrwc54
To make that a reality, a vast area of photovoltaic cells would have to be erected over 250,000 square miles of barren land in the Southwest. 1. The "environmental damage" shading would cause would drive envirowhacks lividly crazier, with predictable results;
2. the massive transmission problems would be a nightmare;
3. the 'eggs in one basket' problem with any kind of disaster, would be catastrophic;
4. transmission losses by the time power reached the East Coast would be massive;
5. Great, while the sun was up...photovoltaics don't work at night, and are poor early & late in the day.
Build more nuke plants, where & as needed.
11
posted on
03/08/2008 9:19:49 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Build more nuke plants now: Proven technology, proven safety, proven Lib-maddening power!)
To: vrwc54
Hey, antinuke enviromorons: the SUN is a giant NUCLEAR reactor, which emits... (drum roll)... lots of radiation!!!
12
posted on
03/08/2008 9:20:30 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
To: vrwc54
It'll run about $10,000-$12,000 for batteries, PV panels and an inverter, with another $3,000-4,000 to install, unless you're a jack of many trades like John.
Damn! How long do the batteries last? They'll have to be replaced sometime since they cannot charge and discharge forever and not lose capacity.
13
posted on
03/08/2008 9:23:57 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: rfp1234
Don’t forget the Earth. It, too, is a source of radiation.
14
posted on
03/08/2008 9:25:36 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: vrwc54
I have to admit, though, living ‘off the grid’ would be somewhat appealing. I wish I could do that, as well as pay cash for all purchases.
15
posted on
03/08/2008 9:26:51 PM PST
by
tarawa
To: SIDENET
Make it a double for me, won't you?
We have a "solar consultant" in my business group. Nice lady, but is waaay overboard on a lot of things. Won't buy candles from the Gold Canyon rep in the group because the paraffin is a petroleum product. I have't asked her yet how much petroleum she thinks is used in the farming of the soybeans for her "ecologically friendly" soy candles.
16
posted on
03/08/2008 9:26:53 PM PST
by
Mygirlsmom
("My advice: Quit supporting the party that is symbolized by an ass." Ted Nugent)
To: vrwc54
“Scientists say that the energy in sunlight striking the earth for 40 minutes is equivalent to global energy consumption for one year. “
And these bozos think that man has the power to warm the entire planet. I skoff.
17
posted on
03/08/2008 9:27:29 PM PST
by
DaveArk
To: vrwc54
The solar house...sits on 65 acres ...part of the 700-acre dairy farm and sawmill he grew up on. When his father died, the land was divided between John and his four sisters.Not all of us are lucky enough to inherit 65 acres of land to do with as we please.
To: rfp1234
Also, how much energy was used to process the metals and glass for his solar panels? Ditto for the batteries?
19
posted on
03/08/2008 9:37:00 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: LibFreeOrDie
Bingo.
He had the money and land to do it. This is almost like a politician who can vote for their own pay increase telling others how to economise.
Going off the grid would be great, but it is currently a bit costly for an average family.
20
posted on
03/08/2008 9:39:36 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson