Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media's Embargo on "Harry's War" Sparks Debate
Reuters via Yahoo.news ^ | 2/29/2008 | Luke Baker

Posted on 03/01/2008 6:35:34 AM PST by wildbill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: LADY J

Just wondering, is Drudge now part of the MSM?


21 posted on 03/01/2008 9:10:26 PM PST by pa_dweller (South of the border - a phrase fast losing its meaning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChiefBoatswain

Chief:

Yu wrote: Do you really think that “Harry” was an asset? Hardly. Without doubt, there were soldiers who were assigned to protect him, and had there been any real action, his powdered and perfumed butt would’ve been moved out of range to safety.

I thought you ought to see this about Prince Harry.

http://www.newsargus.com/news/archives/2008/03/12/prince_harry_learns_why_4th_is_first/index.shtml

Sometimes the nobility can fool ya with their aptitude for war. Maybe it comes with the genes that stretch all the way back to when they were warrior robber barons.


22 posted on 03/13/2008 10:54:58 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson